Different studies investigating generalized genetic epilepsy (GGE) have shown that achieving 5 years of remission, early seizure remission, and needing antiseizure medication (ASM) monotherapy may predict favorable long-term outcomes.
This is a retrospective analytical cohort study. Records of patients with GGE diagnoses at a large epilepsy center in Cairo served as the data source. 630 patients (297 male patients (47.1%) and 333 female (52.9%)) were included, their median onset age was 13 years. The follow-up period of this study was at least 4 years. 418 patients (66.1%) were early remitters, 160 patients (25.4%) were late remitters, and 52 patients (8.3%) were intractable. In addition, 367 patients (58.3%) needed a single ASM to achieve a maximum remission period (monotherapy group), while 263 patients (41.7%) needed ASM polytherapy. Stepwise regression analysis revealed that absence seizures, clusters of seizures, seizure frequency before treatment, and dose of sodium valproate (VPA) until the first remission were independent predictors for polytherapy. Moreover, absence seizures, seizure frequency before treatment, VPA dose, and catamenial seizures in females were independent predictors of intractability.
The majority of GGE have a favorable outcome, some clinical features could predict the need for polytherapy and failure of remission on treatment.
Genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE) includes distinct clinical syndromes, according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE): epilepsy with generalized tonic–clonic seizures alone, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), childhood absence epilepsy (CAE), and juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE) . Despite GGE being typically associated with a positive prognosis, there is a large variance in remission rate . In clinical practice, drug resistance and the need for polytherapy pose a significant problem in patients with GGE [3, 4].
Actually, few long-term outcome studies on GGE have been conducted. In addition, relatively few studies have examined the determinants of continued insufficient seizure control from epilepsy diagnosis till the end of follow-up .
On this background, we sought to analyze seizure outcomes throughout a long-term (4-year) follow-up of a cohort of GGE patients who had been followed from diagnosis in a large epilepsy center. We studied the predictors of polytherapy and persistent treatment resistance among different outcome measures.
In this retrospective cohort analysis, we analyzed the records of 630 patients diagnosed with GGE by a single expert epileptologist between 1994 and 2017 and followed them for at least four years at a single specialized epilepsy center. The diagnosis was determined by a comprehensive clinical evaluation and a conventional interictal electroencephalography (EEG) measurement.
The subjects were recruited based on the following criteria: (a) patients diagnosed and categorized as having genetic generalized epilepsy following ILAE classification (1981 and 1989); (b) both sexes and all age groups; (c) a minimum follow-up duration of 4 years; and (d) complete clinical records are available.
We retrospectively assessed the clinical, demographic, and interictal EEG findings and the previous and current drug regimen. The studied predictors of epilepsy prognosis included the onset age, family history of epilepsy, catamenial seizures, history of febrile seizures, nocturnal seizures, seizure type and frequency, history of status epilepticus or non-convulsive status epilepticus, epilepsy syndrome, temporal patterns of seizures, history of clusters of seizures, EEG findings, early response to treatment with an antiseizure medications (ASMs), response to valproate (VPA) and its dose, and the number of ASMs used to achieve maximum remission.
The follow-up period of this study was at least 4 years, and the intervals between follow-up visits were about 2–3 months for patients with relapse and about 12 months for patients in remission. The follow-up visit was done by patient attendance or telephone call. The duration of follow-up was estimated from the diagnosis date to the final follow-up visit date, while disease duration was calculated from the onset to the last follow-up visit. Therapy and seizure control compliance were evaluated at each medication regimen follow-up visit.
Remission, the most prevalent active principle investigated independently in this analysis, was defined as two or more years of full seizure control following epilepsy diagnosis. Early remission was defined as two or more years of seizure remission that began promptly or within the first two years following an epilepsy diagnosis. In contrast, late remission was defined as 2 years or more of full seizure control attained at least 24 months following the diagnosis of epilepsy. Terminal remission was defined as remission for at least 2 years before the final follow-up visit. Relapse refers to the recurrence of a seizure after at least 2 years of seizure remission. No remission (intractable) was defined as not achieving full seizure control for at least 2 years. The maximum remission time was defined as the longest period of seizure freedom attained during the course of the illness. All categories were applied to patients who had received acceptable ASMs therapy at the recommended daily dosage [6,7,8].
The SPSS software version 28 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA) was used for data analysis. The Mann–Whitney test (non-parametric) was used to compare quantitative variables. The Chi-square test was used for comparing categorical data. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to compute correlations between quantitative variables. Logistic regression was used to identify independent factors of late remission and polytherapy. P-value < 0.05 was regarded significant.
630 patients with GGE were identified. 367 patients (58.3%) were newly diagnosed and started treatment at our center, and 263 (41.7%) were previously diagnosed and started treatment at another center.
Among the studied group, 333 patients (52.9%) were females. The median age at the onset and diagnosis was 13 and 14 years, respectively. Regarding the number of seizure types, 168 patients (26.7%) experienced a single seizure type, 386 patients (61.3%) had two seizure types, while 76 patients (12.1%) had 3 seizure types. The median seizure frequency (GTCs) before treatment was one year, with a range of 0–36 GTCs per year.
The most common syndrome was JME (49.8%), while the least represented syndrome was myoclonic absence epilepsy (1.1%), JAE represented 24.9% (157 patients), GTCs was found in 95 patients (15.5%), CAE was diagnosed in 38 patients (6%), and MAS was detected in 19 patients (3%), moreover, 22 patients (3.5%) had a history of remitted absence epilepsy during childhood as a predictor of poor outcomes. The rest of clinical characteristics are described in Table 1.
Regarding EEG, 52 patients (8.3%) had focal features in EEG, and patients (2.4%) had paroxysmal photo response in EEG. In addition, 122 patients (19.4%) had active EEGs represented by generalized discharges > 3 s.
418 patients (66.3%) achieved early remission, 160 patients (25.4%) achieved late remission, and 52 patients (8.3%) did not achieve 2 years of seizure freedom throughout the disease course (intractable).
52 patients (8.3%) failed to reach at least 2 years without any seizures; 30 of them (57.7%) were females, 2 (3.8%) had febrile seizures previously, and 6 (11.5%) had a history of epilepsy in their families. The median age for patients with intractable epilepsy onset was 12 years (range: 2–26 years); most of them (53.8%) were diagnosed as JME, 14 (26.9%) were diagnosed as JAE, 5 (9.6%) diagnosed as CAE, GTCs was diagnosed in 4 patients and only one patient diagnosed as myoclonic astatic seizures (MAS). The majority (43 patients, 82.7%) had multiple seizure types, 8 of the females (26.7%) had history of catamenial seizures (perimenstrual). nocturnal seizures were detected in 11 patients (21.2%), moreover, 13 patients (25%) had seizures induced by sleep deprivation. Besides, the median frequency of GTCs before treatment was 2/year with a range of 0–36 GTC seizures in a year, history of clusters of seizures was found in 9 patients (17.3%), status epilepticus and non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) was reported in 1 (1.9%) and 5 (9.6%) patients, respectively. Referring to EEG, 2 patients (3.8%) had focal features in EEG, 11 patients (21.1%) had an active EEG, and none had a paroxysmal photo response.
The logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent determinants of intractability and showed that the presence of absence seizures, seizure frequency before treatment, catamenial seizures in females and mean dose of VPA were significant independent predictors of intractability in patients with GGE. Table 2 depicts the results of logistic regression.
The most commonly used drug was VPA (90.5%); 128 patients (20.3%) experienced side effects from VPA. The median dose of VPA to achieve the first remission was 750 mg/day, with a range of 0–2000 mg/day. 328 patients (52.1%) were on a single AED at the last visit, 235 patients (37.3%) were on 2 or more ASMs at the last visit, and 67 (10.6%) patients were off medication.
386 patients (61.3%) achieved the first remission period using a single ASM, while 244 patients (38.7%) needed more than a single ASM to accomplish the first remission. 367 patients (58.3%) required a single ASM to achieve a maximum remission period (monotherapy group), while 263 patients (41.7%) failed to reach a maximum remission period in a single ASM (polytherapy group).
Patients treated with polytherapy had a higher age at onset, a higher age at diagnosis. Besides, they achieved a maximum remission period at older age, had a higher seizure frequency before treatment, a greater number of seizure types, and were diagnosed more with JAE and myoclonic absence. Patients in the monotherapy group are more likely to achieve 5 years of remission and more liable to drug withdrawal than the polytherapy group, as shown in Tables 3 and 4.
The multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant independent predictors of polytherapy in patients with GGE, including nocturnal seizures, absence seizures, cluster of seizures, catamenial seizures in females, higher seizure frequency before treatment, higher VPA dose till achievement of first remission, and EEG focal discharges. The results of multivariable logistic regression analysis are illustrated in Table 5.
There was a highly significant negative correlation between the number of ASMs needed till the achievement of the maximum remission period and the maximum remission period (r = − 0.366) (p < 0.001), denoting that the more ASMs needed, the shorter the maximum remission period and poorer prognosis (Fig. 1).
Patients fulfilling the criteria for GGE according to the ILAE 1989 classification were enrolled in this study. Interestingly, the vast majority of the patients had a favorable outcome, 66.3% of them achieved early remission, and the remission rate at 5 years was almost 70%. Given the overall satisfactory result of GGE provided by the literature, the emphasis of the research is to analyze the clinical course over time in order to determine the factors of the requirement for polytherapy and drug resistance among these patients.
367 patients (58.3%) needed a single ASM to achieve a maximum remission period (monotherapy group), while 263 patients (41.7%) failed to achieve a maximum remission period on a single ASM (polytherapy group). From 630 patients studied in this group, 52 (8.3%) did not reach 2 years of seizure freedom throughout the disease course. Older age at onset and delayed diagnosis were statistically found in polytherapy group. However, there was an insignificant difference regarding gender, family history of epilepsy, or febrile seizure between the groups treated with multiple drugs and those who needed a single drug. No significance was also detected concerning drug resistance. These findings agree to some extent with Gomez-Ibañez and colleagues, who stated that family history of epilepsy, sex, and delayed diagnosis were not associated with significant drug resistance .
Our study noticed a greater number of seizures was associated with poor outcomes. Higher seizure frequency before treatment was an independent predictor of polytherapy (OR 1.134, 95% CI; 1.054–1.220) and drug resistance (OR 1.113, 95% CI; 1.057–1.171). Powell and colleagues also concluded that higher seizure frequency before treatment predicted a reduced probability of seizure remission .
Absence seizure was statistically significant for poor outcome in our study (independent predictor for intractability and polytherapy). A recent study by Irelli and his colleagues found similar results . They studied 177 IGE patients and found that early remission group had a significant lower incidence of absence seizure. Miro and colleagues studied 54 IGE patients and noted the seizures in JAE tended to be more resistant to treatment, higher doses of VPA or polytherapy are usually needed in these patients . This conclusion agrees with our finding that absence seizure predicts poor outcome.
Patients with clusters of seizures had poor outcome in the present study. Sillanpää and Schmidt also stated that patients with cluster of seizures are more liable for drug-resistant epilepsy . Nocturnal seizures were statistically significant for an unfavorable outcome in our study, similarly, a large epilepsy center in Cairo had concluded that sleep convulsive seizure was an independent predictor of lack of 5 years remission in patients with genetic generalized epilepsy .
When referring to catamenial seizures, we found that women with catamenial seizures had an eightfold increased risk for intractability (OR 8.085, 95% CI 2.786–23.464). The presence of catamenial seizures in females was an independent predictor of intractability. A recent study by Kamitaki and colleagues revealed almost similar results . They identified 118 drug-responsive controls and drug-resistant cases with IGE and concluded that female catamenial seizures were an independent predictor of poor outcomes.
The EEG in GGE usually shows the classical findings of Generalized spike wave discharges which often appear fragmented during sleep and can have focal features. However, persistent focal epileptiform activity of focal slowing should not be seen in GGE . A photoparoxysmal response in the form of spike wave complexes with intermittent photic stimulation can be detected in patients with GGE . EEG activity is defined as runs of generalized discharges more than 3 s .
Focal EEG features and active EEG were significantly associated with polytherapy Gelisse and colleagues concluded that there was no prognostic impact of focal features in EEG in patients with IGE . In prospective research, EEG characteristics did not influence the outcome . Persistent EEG abnormalities after ASMs withdrawal were independent predictors of seizure relapse, according to other studies [19, 20].
The dose of VPA needed to achieve the first remission significantly differed between the monotherapy and polytherapy groups (p < 0.001). According to the multivariable analysis, VPA resistance was substantially related to the requirement for multiple drugs to accomplish the first remission (OR: 1.002, 95% CI = 1.002–1.003). This finding matches the study by Gesche and his colleagues, who concluded with almost similar results. They studied 137 adult GGE patients, 33 patients fulfilled the criteria for drug-resistant epilepsy. In addition, VPA resistance was the most significant predictive indicator for refractory seizures .
The fundamental limitation of our research is that the data were obtained retrospectively, making it hard to create a predetermined standard classification of our prognostic criteria. All participants, however, had detailed clinical and EEG recordings, and patients were reevaluated at the end of the long-term follow-up, with the clinical course documented. The assignment of the first ASM in newly diagnosed patients was not randomized, preventing us from making conclusions on the comparative effectiveness of drugs administered at the time of diagnosis.
The majority of GGE have a favorable outcome. Absence seizures, clusters of seizures, seizure frequency before treatment, and dose of sodium valproate until the first remission were independent predictors for polytherapy. Moreover, absence seizures, seizure frequency before treatment, VPA dose, and catamenial seizures in females were independent predictors of intractability.
Availability of data and materials
The data used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Childhood absence epilepsy
Genetic generalized epilepsy
Generalized tonic clonic
International Business Machines
Idiopathic generalized epilepsy
International League Against Epilepsy
Juvenile absence epilepsy
Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy
Myoclonic astatic seizures
Non-convulsive statue epilepticus
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
United States of America
Scheffer IE, French J, Hirsch E, Jain S, Mathern GW, Moshé SL, et al. ILAE classification of the epilepsies: position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017;58(4):512–21.
Cerulli Irelli E, Morano A, Barone FA, Fisco G, Fanella M, Orlando B, et al. Persistent treatment resistance in genetic generalized epilepsy: a long-term outcome study in a tertiary epilepsy center. Epilepsia. 2020;61(11):2452–60.
Geithner J, Schneider F, Wang Z, Berneiser J, Herzer R, Kessler C, et al. Predictors for long-term seizure outcome in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: 25–63 years of follow-up. Epilepsia. 2012;53(8):1379–86.
Ashmawi A, Hosny H, Abdelalim A, Bianchi E, Beghi E. The long-term prognosis of newly diagnosed epilepsy in Egypt: a retrospective cohort study from an epilepsy center in Greater Cairo. Seizure. 2016;41:86–95.
Powell G, Logan J, Kiri V, Borghs S. Trends in antiepileptic drug treatment and effectiveness in clinical practice in England from 2003 to 2016: a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records. BMJ Open. 2019;9(12): e032551.
Ashmawi A, Hosny H, Gadallah M, Beghi E. Sleep convulsive seizures predict lack of remission in genetic generalized epilepsies: a retrospective study from a single epilepsy center in Egypt. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;136(5):528–35.
Kamitaki BK, Janmohamed M, Kandula P, Elder C, Mani R, Wong S, et al. Clinical and EEG factors associated with antiseizure medication resistance in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2022;63(1):150–61.
Hirsch E, French J, Scheffer IE, Bogacz A, Alsaadi T, Sperling MR, et al. ILAE definition of the idiopathic generalized epilepsy syndromes: Position Statement by the ILAE Task Force on Nosology and Definitions. Epilepsia. 2021.
Arntsen V, Sand T, Syvertsen MR, Brodtkorb E. Prolonged epileptiform EEG runs are associated with persistent seizures in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy res. 2017;134:26–32.
Yıldırım M, Bektaş Ö, Kartal AT, Süt NY, Teber S, et al. Risk of seizure relapse and long-term outcomes after discontinuation of antiseizure medication in children with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2022;134: 108779.
Liang X, Yu N, Zhang YF, Gu L, Di Q. Prognostic implications of persistent interictal epileptiform discharges on antiseizure medication withdrawal in patients with epilepsy in five-year remission. Seizure. 2022;94:100–6.
HH, NE and HA contributed to the conception, design, drafting, and revising of the manuscript. MA contributed to data acquisition. MA and HA contributed to data analysis and interpretation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Permission from Neurology department, Cairo University ethical committee was obtained on April 2019.
Consent for publication
The authors have no conflict of interests to disclose.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.