Skip to main content
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
Download PDF

Investigating the role of VDR gene variants in multiple sclerosis susceptibility: a case–control study in Egypt

The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery volume 60, Article number: 51 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder. Vitamin D has a major role in preventing inflammatory disorders as well as its role in the pathophysiology of MS. Vitamin D initiates its biological responses by binding to the nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR). Several studies have been conducted over the last decade to investigate the relationship between VDR gene variants and the risk of MS, but the results have been inconsistent and inconclusive. The objective of this study is to investigate the association between the VDR gene variants (c.1025-49C>A) and (c.1056A>G) and MS susceptibility in a sample of the Egyptian population, and to shed light on its potential role in preventing inflammatory disorders and its impact on clinical outcomes and treatment using TaqMan Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). This case-control study was conducted on 100 participants, categorized into two groups. The first group included 50 patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) based on the Revised McDonald MS criteria, and the second group included 50 matched healthy participants. After collecting the blood samples, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted and detection of the VDR: c.1025-49C>A and VDR: c.1056A>G gene variants was done using TaqMan Real-Time PCR on all involved individuals.

Results

The distribution of the genotypes and alleles of VDR gene variants (c.1025- 49C>A) and (c.1056A>G) did not differ significantly between MS patients and healthy participants (P>0.05 in both).

Conclusion

Here we show in this study that there was no association between the risk of MS and the VDR gene variants (c.1025-49C>A) and (c.1056A>G) in a group of the Egyptian population which may have impact on MS therapy and outcome.

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease that often affects young and middle-aged adults. It is characterized by demyelination of the central nervous system (CNS) matter, both grey and white leading to disorganization of the nervous system conduction. MS is one of the most common causes of non-traumatic disability among young and middle-aged adults [1].

The etiology of MS is still unsettled, but it is assumed that environmental, geographical, and genetic factors may have a role in its etiology and progression [2].

MS is still an incurable disease that affects an estimated 2.8 million people globally. It most commonly happens during one of the most productive times of life, namely young adulthood, making the condition responsible for lowering the quality of life not only for those affected but also for society as a whole [3].

The diagnosis of MS is made according to the revised McDonald criteria, which is based on neurological symptoms and signs, as well as evidence of dissemination of CNS lesions in space and time. Modern revolutionary techniques such as immunohistochemistry and MRI allow the recognition of multiple sclerosis lesions. These lesions appear throughout the CNS matter as focal areas of demyelination, inflammation, and glial reaction. It is denoted by fully or partially reversible incidents of neurological disability, usually lasting days to weeks [4].

Clinical researchers in the last decade have drawn attention to vitamin D deficiency and its role in MS pathophysiology. Vitamin D has broad regulatory effects on cells of the adaptive and innate immune system, such as reducing T cell proliferation and shifting the balance of T cell differentiation from the Th1 and Th17 pathways to the Th2 and regulatory T cell (Treg) pathways [5].

The effect of vitamin D is dependent on the nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR), so any changes in vitamin D can be influenced by mutations in the VDR gene, such as single nucleotide variants (SNVs) [6].

The risk of developing MS has associated with certain class I and class II alleles of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), particularly the HLA-DRB1 locus. The presence of a vitamin D response element (VDRE) located in the promoter region of many but not all HLA-DRB1 alleles suggests that environmental differences in vitamin D might interact with HLA-DRB1 to influence the risk of MS. The VDRE enhances gene expression when stimulated by vitamin D. However, other factors related to HLA variation may have more impact on MS risk than vitamin D regulation of HLA-DR expression [3]. Mounting evidence suggests that the risk of MS is associated with multiple genes related to vitamin D metabolic pathway of modest effect (such as, DHCR7, NADSYN1, CYP2R1, CYP27A1, CYP3A4, CYP24A1, VDBP) and genes related to the mechanism of action (VDR, RXR, and MARRS) [7].

The vitamin D receptor gene is located on chromosome 12q13.1 and is approximately 100 kb in size and is divided into 8 introns and 9 exons. The first exon contains the gene promoter, exon 2–3 code for the DNA binding domain, and exon 6–9 for the ligand-binding domain [8].

The 1,25(OH)2 D3 binds to VDR with high affinity and selectivity as it exerts its effect through a series of cell-signaling reactions. To exert the genomic effect, 1,25(OH)2 D3 dissociates from vitamin D-binding protein and then diffuses across the plasma membrane migrating towards the nucleus. The interaction of 1,25(OH)2 D3 hormone with VDR initiates a complex cascade of molecular events that activates a range of biological functions or mediates the suppression of gene transcriptions [9, 10].

Gene variants can be defined as subtle sequence variations transpiring in at least 1% of the population. Variants alter gene expression, thereby affecting protein levels of the VDR gene, leading to functional changes. Despite over 30 variants discovered within the VDR gene, four SNVs have been studied as the major variants involved in autoimmune diseases such as MS, including rs2228570 (VDR:c.2 T > C), rs1544410 (VDR:c.1024 + 283G > T), rs7975232 (VDR:c.1025-49C > A) and rs731236 (VDR:c.1056A > G) [8].

Some well-known VDR gene variants are rs2228570 (VDR: c.2 T > C), rs1544410 (VDR: c.1024 + 283G > T), rs7975232 (VDR: c.1025-49C > A), and rs731236 (VDR: c.1056A > G). In general, the majority of variants in the VDR gene are found to be in regulatory areas such as the 5’ promoter area and the 3’ UTR region rather than in coding exons [6].

The rs2228570 (VDR:c.2 T > C) variant is located in the translation initiation site in exon 2 (alteration in the start codon) causing shortened VDR protein. The rs1544410 (VDR:c.1024 + 283G > T) and rs7975232 (VDR:c.1025-49C > A) variants are located in the intron between exon 8–9 at the 3′ end. The rs731236 (VDR:c.1056A > G) is located in exon 9 at the 3′ end. These variants do not affect VDR protein but are involved in the regulation of the stability of VDR mRNA. Regarding their functional effect, they could generate an alteration in the splice sites for mRNA transcription or a change in the intron regulatory elements of VDR [11, 12].

The rs731236 (VDR: c.1056A > G) gene variant (which was known as TaqI, referred to the used, Thermus aquaticus restriction enzyme) is a transition substitution. It results from a T (thymine) replacement by a C (cytosine) nucleotide, where the ATT codon transitions to ATC generating a silent mutation, as both encode the amino acid isoleucine. Nonetheless, this SNV may alter some functional characteristics of the protein as it is involved in the regulation of mRNA stability and correlates with transcriptional activity [13, 14].

While rs7975232 (VDR:c.1025-49C > A) gene variant, was defined using the Acetobacter pasteurianus restriction enzyme, therefore was known as ApaI, is a transversion substitution. It presents a change of A (alanine) instead of C (cytosine) nucleotide but there is no change in the amino acid sequence of the VDR protein [15].

There are many discrepancies in the study results regarding these variants; while some studies have established an association between VDR gene variants and vitamin D levels, other studies have not found any such association [1, 16,17,18,19,20].

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the VDR gene variants c.1025-49C > A and c.1056A > G and MS susceptibility in a sample of the Egyptian population, and to study its effect on clinical outcomes using TaqMan Real-Time PCR. The findings of the study could have implications for the treatment and prevention of multiple sclerosis in Egypt.

Methods

This case–control study was conducted on two groups: Group I, consisting of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients recruited from Multiple Sclerosis unit of Kasr el Ainy, Cairo University  between March 2021 and March 2022, and Group II, consisting of healthy control individuals of matching age and sex.

Sample size calculation was done using the comparison of the prevalence of VDR: c.1056A > G (rs731236) and VDR: c.1025-49C > A (rs7975232) genotypes between Egyptian patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and matched healthy controls, as reported in previous publications [21, 22].

Inclusion criteria included patients diagnosed with RRMS based on the Revised McDonald MS criteria of 2017 [23]. Both sexes were included with an age range between 18 and 52 years. Exclusion criteria included patients with neurological, inflammatory, and autoimmune diseases other than MS, as well as smokers.

All patients were subjected to the following history taking, clinical, and neurological examination including the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) [23].

Blood samples were taken for molecular analysis of VDR gene variants: c.1056A > G (rs731236) and c.1025-49C > A (rs7975232) using TaqMan Real-Time polymerase chain reaction in the Molecular Research and Diagnosis Unit at the Chemical Pathology Department of Kasr el Ainy, Cairo University.

Regarding collection of samples, Peripheral venous blood samples were taken and dispensed into 3 mL tubes containing 5.4 mg of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), then they were stored at – 20 °C for DNA extraction.

The test was done in two main steps, DNA extraction in which Genomic DNA was extracted from EDTA-anticoagulated peripheral blood leucocytes according to the manufacturer’s instructions using QIAamp DNA Extraction Mini Kit provided by Thermo Fisher Scientific. The extracted DNA was stored at – 20 °C for further use. The purity and concentration of the DNA was detected by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm (A260) to the absorbance at 280 nm (A280) By Nanodrop. Then Detection of the VDR c.1056A > G (rs731236) and c.1025-49C > A (rs7975232) gene variants was performed using the Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA). Vitamin D receptor SNVs (rs731236, rs7975232) were genotyped by fluorogenic TaqMan SNV technology from a ready to use assays library (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with the TaqMan Genotyping Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in a 20 µl reaction volume. The final concentration of genomic DNA for all samples in the experiment sample was 10 ng/µl [25,26,27,28,29].

IBM SPSS® Statistics version 22 (IBM® Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Numerical data were expressed as mean and standard deviation, or median and range, as appropriate. Qualitative data were expressed as frequency and percentage. Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to examine the relationship between qualitative variables. For normally distributed quantitative data, a comparison between two groups was done using the Student’s t-test, while a comparison between more than two groups was done using ANOVA test. For not normally distributed quantitative data, a comparison between three groups was done using the Kruskal–Wallis test (non-parametric ANOVA). All tests were two-tailed, and a P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Odds ratios were used to present the strength of association between risk factors and outcomes.

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine (IRB No. MS-279-2021) and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent were obtained from all participants before they enrolled to participate in the study.

Results

This study included 50 patients with RRMS and 50 healthy, age- and sex-matched controls showing demographic data in Table 1.

Table 1 Participant characteristics
Full size table

Regarding the VDR c.1056A > G (rs731236) genotype analysis and alleles distributions for all studied subjects by real-time PCR (Table 2, Fig. 1).

Table 2 The distribution of VDR c.1056A > G (rs731236) variant genotypes and alleles in study groups
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Genotype distribution of VDR c.1056A > G (rs731236) variant among study groups

Full size image

Regarding the genotype analysis and alleles distribution of VDR c.1025-49C > A (rs7975232) by TaqMan Real-Time PCR (Table 3, Fig. 2).

Table 3 The distribution of VDR c.1025-49C > A (rs7975232) variant genotypes and alleles in study groups
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Genotype distribution of VDR c.1025-49C > A (rs7975232) variant among study groups

Full size image

No statistically significant difference was found when comparing different VDR c.1056A > G gene variants regarding the main clinical parameters in MS patients; the same was reported regarding VDR c.1025-49C > A gene variants, as shown in Table 4.

Table 4 Comparison of different VDR c.1056A > G and c.1025-49C > A gene variants regarding main clinical parameters in MS patients
Full size table

The haplotyping between VDR c.1056A > G and VDR c.1025-49C > A gene variants was done, as shown in Table 5.

Table 5 Haplotype analysis between VDR c.1056A > G and c.1025-49C > A gene variants
Full size table

In summary, our findings demonstrated an increase in the G allele in the MS group, which is thought to be the hazardous allele; however, this difference was not statistically significant in VDR:c.1056A > G (rs731236). However, in the VDR:c.1025-49C > A (rs7975232) variant allelic distribution A hazardous allele was found to be more prevalent in the MS group, although it did not achieve statistical significance. In both variations, haplotype analysis and genotype distribution demonstrate a non-significant relationship to MS etiology.

Discussion

Multiple sclerosis is a demyelinating neurodegenerative autoimmune illness. Motor dysfunction, autonomic symptoms, and psychbehavioral aspects of MS include gait difficulties, paresthesia, visual issues, vertigo, incontinence, sexual problems, pain, cognitive dysfunctions, emotional disturbances, and depression. MS biomarkers and gene variants certainly may be able to help identify various stages of MS and build personalized treatment plan [30, 31].

This study aimed to investigate the association between the VDR c.1056A > G and c.1025-49C > A SNVs and susceptibility to MS in a group of Egyptian population which is an important point provides insights into the potential role of vitamin D in preventing inflammatory disorders and its impact on clinical outcomes. The findings of the study could have implications for the treatment and prevention of MS in Egypt. Our results revealed that there was an increase in the G allele in the MS group, which was suggested to be the risky allele; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance in VDR c.1056A > G (rs731236). On the other hand, in VDR c.1025-49C > A (rs7975232), the variant allelic distribution of the A allele, which was supposed to be the risky allele, was increased in the MS group but did not reach statistical significance. The genotype distribution in both variants showed no significant relation to MS pathogenesis. Most of the published work agreed with part of our data and disagreed with others.

Regarding the VDR c.1056A > G genotype distribution analysis, in agreement with our results, Mazrouei-Arani et al. (2022) conducted a study on 101 MS patients and 101 healthy subjects in the Iranian population, and Moosavi et al. (2021) conducted a study on 160 MS patients and 162 healthy personnel and found that the genotype frequency of VDRc.1056A > G did not differ between the patients and controls (P = 0.348 and P = 0.092, respectively) [1, 18]. Additionally, Hassab et al. (2019) and Zayed et al. (2019) (in which 50 and 63 Egyptian MS patients were recruited, respectively) revealed no statistically significant association between MS and VDRc.1056A > G (P = 0.945 and P = 0.845, respectively) [22, 32].

In other studies, conducted on the Turkish population, there was nostatistically significant difference between 167 MS patients and 146 healthy controls, and between 70 MS patients and 70 healthy controls, respectively [33, 34]. Additionally, Zhang et al. (2018) conducted a meta-analysis which included 24 case–control studies with a total of 4013 cases and 4218 controls and found that the association between the VDRc.1056A > G variant and MS was not significant under dominant, recessive genotypes, and allele contrast (P = 0.078, P = 0.314, and P = 0.127, respectively) in overall populations [35]. Similarly, Imani et al. (2019) conducted a meta-analysis with a total of 30 case–control studies and detected no significant association across different genotype models [18].

In contrast to our findings, Al-Temaimi et al. (2015) found that the genotype distribution of Kuwaiti VDR c.1056A > G in 50 MS patients was significantly different from that of 50 healthy controls (P = 0.0008) [21].

In addition, Mohammadi et al. (2020) discovered a statistically significant negative relationship between the VDR c.1056A > G variant and risk of MS in the homozygote A/A genetic model (OR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.08–0.9; P = 0.04) [36]. Additionally, Abdollahzadeh et al. (2018) found that the homozygote G/G genotype carriers for the VDR c.1056A > G variant have a predisposition to MS (OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.05–4.52) [37]. Furthermore, Zhang et al. (2019) conducted a meta-analysis, which included 27 case–control studies with 4879 MS patients and 5402 controls and observed that the G/G genotype is associated with the risk of MS (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.62–0.94) [38].

Concerning the allelic distribution, similar to our findings, Mohammadi et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis which showed that in allelic comparison, no statistical association between allele G and risk of MS was found in 1206 Iranian patients (P = 0.07) [36].

However, Moosavi et al. (2021) found that the G allele was more prominent in 160 MS patients than in the 162 control individuals, increasing the risk of disease susceptibility by 1.6 times (OR = 1.6, P = 0.0232) [1]. According to Abdollahzadeh et al. (2018), the G allele had a positive correlation with MS (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.36–2.87; P = 0.003), while the A allele had a negative association (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.39–0.73; P = 0.003) [36]. Additionally, Al-Temaimi et al. (2015) demonstrated that the G allele was associated with MS risk (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.2–2.4; P = 0.003) [21].

Regarding the VDR c.1025-49C > A genotype distribution analysis, in agreement with our results, many studies and meta-analyses done on Turkish and Iranian populations have agreed with our results, showing no evidence of an association between VDR c.1025-49C > A and MS risk [17, 35, 37, 38].

In contrast to our findings, a statistical analysis of a study done by Mazrouei-Arani et al. (2022) revealed a significant association between VDR c.1025-49C > A genotypes and MS disease (P = 0.05), showing that MS patients had an A/A genotype 2.54 times higher than the CC genotype (OR = 2.54, P = 0.029) [18].

Upon evaluating the genotypes by Cetinel et al. (2021), a statistically significant correlation was found with VDRc.1025-49C > A A/A, C/C, and A/C (P < 0.01, 0.01, and P < 0.01, respectively) in the SPMS group and with VDR:c.1025-49C > A A/A and A/C genotypes (P = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively) in the PPMS group, but no significant difference was found in the genotypes within the RRMS group [16].

In a meta-analysis study conducted on 1206 cases and 1402 controls, a statistically significant association was also found between the VDR c.1025-49C > A homozygote genetic model of A/A and G/G and the risk of MS (OR = 3.48, 95% CI = 1.7–6.9; P = 0.00) [36]. Additionally, Zhang et al. (2019) performed a meta-analysis revealed a significant association between the VDRc.1025-49C > A variant and MS risk in Asians in the recessive model C/C genotype (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.53–0.82; P = 0.0002) [37].

Regarding the allelic distribution, like our findings, Imani et al. (2019) meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in allelic discrimination [17].

However, Mohammadi et al. (2020) meta-analysis showed a statistically significant relationship between the A allele and decreased risk of MS in Iran (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.37–0.79, P = 0.00) [36]. Additionally, Hassab et al. (2019) study detected a statistically significant association between the A allele and MS cases (OR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.25–4.88, P = 0.008) [22]. Furthermore Zhang et al. (2018) conducted a meta-analysis which observed that the A allele was associated with MS risk in Asian populations (OR = 1.267, 95% CI = 1.074–1.496; P = 0.005) [35].

The contradictory results of the studies may be because; small sample sizes, differences in ethnicities, extensive geographic variation, interactions with other genetic or environmental factors, and/or clinical heterogeneity.

The significance of this manuscript is that it presents a research study that looks into the relationship between VDR gene variants and MS in the Egyptian population. The study analyzes genetic data using TaqMan Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) which is accurate method and provides insights into the potential role of vitamin D in preventing inflammatory disorders and its impact on clinical outcomes. The findings of the study could have implications for the treatment and prevention of MS in Egypt. The research adds to the body of knowledge on the subject and may help guide future research and clinical practice. It is recommended that the results obtained by this study be studied on a wider scale with a larger sample size, taking into consideration the presence of different ethnicities. It is also advised that other single nucleotide variants (SNVs) of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) affecting multiple sclerosis (MS) should be studied. This will help in clarifying the genetic role in the development of MS and achieving more accurate results.

Conclusion

Vitamin D receptor gene variants had been studied in many studies to assess its relationship with MS, but the results are contradictory. Data from this study suggested that there was no association between the risk of MS and the VDR gene variants regarding VDR c.1025-49C > A and VDR c.1056A > G in a group of Egyptian population.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during the current study are not publicly available due to the hospital policy and because the data will be used in future multi-center research to generate a nationwide statistic. However, these datasets are available from the corresponding author (Hala Ashraf) on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

A:

Adenine

C:

Cytosine

G:

Guanine

MS:

Multiple sclerosis

VDR:

Vitamin D receptor

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

RRMS:

Relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

CNS:

Central nervous system

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

Treg:

Regulatory T cells

SNVs:

Single nucleotide variants

REC:

Research Ethics Committee

EDSS:

Expanded Disability Status Scale

EDTA:

Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid

References

  1. Moosavi E, Rafiei A, Yazdani Y, Eslami M, Saeedi M. Association of serum levels and receptor genes BsmI, TaqI and FokI polymorphisms of vitamin D with the severity of multiple sclerosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;84:75–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vaughn CB, Jakimovski D, Kavak KS, Ramanathan M, Benedict RH, Zivadinov R, et al. Epidemiology and treatment of multiple sclerosis in elderly populations. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(6):329–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Polyák H, Galla Z, Nánási N, Cseh EK, Rajda C, Veres G, et al. The tryptophan-kynurenine metabolic system is suppressed in cuprizone-induced model of demyelination simulating progressive multiple sclerosis. Biomed. 2023;11(3):945.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brownlee WJ, Hardy TA, Fazekas F, Miller DH. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges. Lancet. 2017;389(10076):1336–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bikle DD. Vitamin D regulation of immune function. Vitam Horm. 2011;1(86):1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lu M, McComish BJ, Burdon KP, Taylor BV, Körner H. The association between vitamin D and multiple sclerosis risk: 1, 25 (OH) 2D3 induces super-enhancers bound by VDR. Front Immunol. 2019;19(10):488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ortiz GG, Torres-Mendoza BM, Ramírez-Jirano J, Marquez-Pedroza J, Hernández-Cruz JJ, Mireles-Ramirez MA, et al. Genetic basis of inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system: multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum. Genes. 2023;14(7):1319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammadi A, Azarnezhad A, Khanbabaei H, Izadpanah E, Abdollahzadeh R, Barreto GE, et al. Vitamin D receptor genetic polymorphisms and the risk of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Steroids. 2020;158: 108615.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pike JW, Meyer MB. Fundamentals of vitamin D hormone-regulated gene expression. J Steroid Biochem. 2014;144:5–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sirajudeen S, Shah I, Al MA. A narrative role of vitamin D and its receptor: with current evidence on the gastric tissues. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(15):3832.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Köstner KI, Denzer N, Mueller CS, Klein R, Tilgen W, Reichrath J. The relevance of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms for cancer: a review of the literature. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(9):3511–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Triantos C, Aggeletopoulou I, Kalafateli M, Spantidea PI, Vourli G, Diamantopoulou G, et al. Prognostic significance of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms in liver cirrhosis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):14065.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Morrison NA, Qi JC, Tokita A, Kelly PJ, Crofts L, Nguyen TV, et al. Prediction of bone density from vitamin D receptor alleles. Nature. 1994;367(6460):284–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Souza Freitas R, Fratelli CF, de Souza Silva CM, de Lima LR, Stival MM, da Silva IC, Funghetto SS. Association of Vitamin D with the TaqI Polymorphism of the VDR gene in older women attending the basic health unit of the Federal District, DF (Brazil). J Aging Res. 2020;2020.

  15. Ruiz-Ballesteros AI, Meza-Meza MR, Vizmanos-Lamotte B, Parra-Rojas I, de la Cruz-Mosso U. Association of vitamin D metabolism gene polymorphisms with autoimmunity: evidence in population genetic studies. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(24):9626.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cetinel TT, Gokce SF, Yildirim ME, Bolayir A. Effects of ApaI, FokI, and BsmI gene polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor on serum vitamin D level in Turkish MS patients with different types and severities of the disease. Ann Med Res. 2019;28:11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Imani D, Razi B, Motallebnezhad M, Rezaei R. Association between vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms and the risk of multiple sclerosis (MS): an updated meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. 2019;19:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mazrouei-Arani N, Zargar M, Nikoueinejad H. Association between ApaI and TaqI polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor gene and the multiple sclerosis. Gene Rep. 2022;1(27): 101584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaebler AJ, Finner-Prével M, Sudar FP, Langer FH, Keskin F, Gebel A, et al. The interplay between vitamin D, exposure of anticholinergic antipsychotics and cognition in schizophrenia. Biomed. 2022;10(5):1096.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Quirant-Sánchez B, Mansilla MJ, Navarro-Barriuso J, Presas-Rodríguez S, Teniente-Serra A, Fondelli F, et al. Combined therapy of vitamin D3-tolerogenic dendritic cells and interferon-β in a preclinical model of multiple sclerosis. Biomed. 2021;9(12):1758.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Temaimi RA, Al-Enezi A, Al-Serri A, Al-Roughani R, Al-Mulla F. The association of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms with multiple sclerosis in a case-control study from Kuwait. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(11): e0142265.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hassab AH, Deif AH, Elneely DA, Tawadros IM, Fayad AI. Protective association of VDR gene polymorphisms and haplotypes with multiple sclerosis patients in Egyptian population. Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2019;20(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, Carroll WM, Coetzee T, Comi G, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(2):162–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33(11):1444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Albahlol IA, Neamatallah M, Serria MS, El-Gilany AH, Setate YA, Alkasaby NM, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and polycystic ovary syndrome susceptibility. BMC Medical Genom. 2023;16(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Barut D, Akisu M, Koroglu OA, Terek D, Ergin F, Onay H, et al. The role of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism in the development of necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatr Res. 2023;3:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Usategui-Martín R, De Luis-Román DA, Fernández-Gómez JM, Ruiz-Mambrilla M, Pérez-Castrillón JL. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms modify the response to vitamin D supplementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2022;14(2):360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Pistono C, Osera C, Monti MC, Boiocchi C, Mallucci G, Cuccia M, Pascale A. Vitamin D receptor and its influence on multiple sclerosis risk and severity: from gene polymorphisms to protein expression. Immuno. 2022;2(3):469–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Guerini FR, Agliardi C, Oreni L, Groppo E, Bolognesi E, Zanzottera M, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism predicts the outcome of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(17):13379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tanaka M, Vécsei L. Editorial of special issue ‘dissecting neurological and neuropsychiatric diseases: neurodegeneration and neuroprotection.’ Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(13):6991.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Török N, Tanaka M, Vécsei L. Searching for peripheral biomarkers in neurodegenerative diseases: the tryptophan-kynurenine metabolic pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(24):9338.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zayed AM, Shehata AE, Gouda TA, Abd Elnour HM. Association of vitamin D receptor, interleukin7 receptor alpha gene polymorphisms with the risk of multiple sclerosis. ZUMJ. 2021;27(1):122–31.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cakina S, Ocak O, Ozkan A, Yucel S, Karaman HIO. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in multiple sclerosis disease: a case-control study. RJLabM. 2018;26(4):489–96.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kamisli O, Acar C, Sozen M, Tecellioglu M, Yücel FE, Vaizoglu D, et al. The association between vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and multiple sclerosis in a Turkish population. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;1(20):78–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang YJ, Zhang L, Chen SY, Yang GJ, Huang XL, Duan Y, et al. Association between VDR polymorphisms and multiple sclerosis: systematic review and updated meta-analysis of case-control studies. J Neurol Sci. 2018;39:225–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mohammadi A, Azarnezhad A, Khanbabaei H, Izadpanah E, Abdollahzadeh R, Barreto GE, et al. Vitamin D receptor genetic polymorphisms and the risk of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Steroids. 2020;1(158): 108615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Abdollahzadeh R, Moradi Pordanjani P, Rahmani F, Mashayekhi F, Azarnezhad A, Mansoori Y. Association of VDR gene polymorphisms with risk of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in an Iranian Kurdish population. Int J Neurosci. 2018;128(6):505–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang D, Wang L, Zhang R, Li S. Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and the risk of multiple sclerosis: a meta analysis. Arch Med Res. 2019;50(6):350–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dobson R, Giovannoni G. Multiple sclerosis–a review. Eur J Neurol. 2019;26(1):27–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the patients for their participation and cooperation in this study.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency from commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical and Chemical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

    Hala Ashraf Hosni, Noha Wael Ibrahim & Sahar Abd El-Atty Sharaf

  2. Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

    Amr Mohamed Fouad

Authors
  1. Hala Ashraf Hosni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amr Mohamed Fouad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Noha Wael Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sahar Abd El-Atty Sharaf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HAH was the idea founder, shared in the patient collection, and the supervisor in all the steps. AMF shared in the patient collection did the data analysis, wrote and revised the manuscript and is the submitting and corresponding author. NWI shared in the patient collection and did the laboratory work. SAS shared in the patient collection and supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hala Ashraf Hosni.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (IRB No. MS-279-2021) and was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consents were obtained from all participants before the enrollment to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosni, H.A., Fouad, A.M., Ibrahim, N.W. et al. Investigating the role of VDR gene variants in multiple sclerosis susceptibility: a case–control study in Egypt. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 60, 51 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00794-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00794-z