- Case Report
- Open access
- Published:
Imaging findings in carcinomatous encephalitis secondary to malignant melanoma
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery volume 59, Article number: 76 (2023)
Abstract
Background
The case of disseminated cancer cell spreading throughout the brain is called “miliary metastases” or “carcinomatous encephalitis”, a very rare and critical condition (primarily associated with lung and breast cancer) in which there are multiple plaque with a perivascular distribution, made of punctate lesions spread in all the brain. To our knowledge this represents the fourth case of melanotic miliary brain metastases described in the literature, also associated with melanin content of the lesions that is already evident on unenhanced T1-weighted images.
Case presentation
A 75-year-old patient with history of metastatic cutaneous melanoma (BRAF V600E mutate, PD-L1 negative) in treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib after 9 years from the diagnosis developed severe cognitive-motor slowing. Contrast-enhanced brain MRI showed miliary enhancing intra-axial brain lesions involving supra- and sub-tentorial regions and also the perivascular spaces, characterized by a bright appearance on unenhanced T1-weighted images without signal hypointensity in T2*-weighted images, as for melanotic pattern. Thus, the radiological diagnosis of “carcinomatous encephalitis” was made. Neurological examination showed an alert and cooperative subject with increased reaction time in verbal and motor responses. No ocular motility disturbances were found, and there were no motor or sensory deficits in the four limbs. The finger-to-nose test was normal, and no coordination deficit was found bilaterally. Blood tests and body temperature demonstrated no signs of ongoing infection. Electroencephalography showed slow and punctate abnormalities in bilateral fronto-temporal regions, with left prevalence. Corticosteroid therapy was started during hospitalization, improving the clinical picture. The patient was then discharged after 4 days in good clinical conditions with the indication to start second-line treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab and to perform a whole-brain irradiation.
Conclusions
Brain MRI plays a crucial role for the non-invasive diagnosis of carcinomatous encephalitis and for the differential diagnosis with other pathologies. Awareness of the existence of this disorder even in patients with melanoma is necessary to avoid diagnostic delays. Miliary brain metastases should be suspected in all melanoma patients with new neurological findings and contrast-enhanced MRI should be performed to assess the real burden of the disease.
Background
Malignant cutaneous melanoma is the most common subtype of malignant melanoma, a neoplasm that arises from melanocytes, with an incidence of 18.3 per 100,000 people per year, which is increasing in the last decade [1].
The case of disseminated cancer cell spreading throughout the brain is called “miliary metastases” or “carcinomatous encephalitis” (CE), a very rare condition in which there are multiple plaque with a perivascular distribution [2], made of punctate lesions spread in all the brain.
We present the fourth case of melanotic miliary brain metastases described in the literature, also associated with melanin content of the lesions that is already evident on unenhanced T1-weighted images [3,4,5].
Case presentation
A 75-year-old patient being treated for metastatic melanoma was urgently admitted to the Oncology Department for incipient worsening of general clinical condition, with cognitive-motor slowing.
The patient's oncologic history started in November 2013 with the removal of cutaneous melanoma of the left shoulder histologically classified as superficial spreading melanoma with vertical growth, infiltrating the reticular dermis (Clark’s level of IV; Breslow’s depth of 0.82 mm). Cutaneous margin enlargement and sentinel lymph node were negative for disease localization. In august 2014, he removed an additional skin melanoma at the level of the left scapula histologically classified as melanoma in situ (Breslow’s depth of 0.3 mm). In subsequent years, the patient underwent further excisions of numerous basal cell and spinocellular carcinomas for which he continued regular dermatologic and radiologic follow-ups with no evidence of recurrence. Whole-body computed tomography (WB-CT) performed in March 2022, showed the appearance of multiple metastatic lesions, at the level of the brain, lungs, liver, right adrenal gland, spleen, peritoneum, spine, and in the subcutaneous fatty tissue. The subsequent biopsy of one of the liver lesions and one of the subcutaneous lesions confirmed metastatic localization of melanoma (BRAF V600E mutate, PD-L1 negative). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain documented at least 7 metastases located in the supratentorial cortico-subcortical site and at the level of the basal ganglia (maximum diameter of 6 mm). At the end of March 2022, the patient then started systemic therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib with a good response at the WB-CT performed in May 2022.
In September 2022, the subsequent WB-CT (Siemens Somatom Definition AS, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany, after intravenous administration of 120 ml of Omnipaque 350 mgI/ml, Ioexolo, GE Healthcare, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America) documented the appearance of highly vascularized lesions in the brain, suggestive of metastatic lesions (Fig. 1). After 2 weeks (October 2022), the patient complained of severe cognitive-motor slowing and therefore underwent a contrast-enhanced brain MRI (1.5 T Magnetom Symphony, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany, before and after intravenous administration of 10 ml of dotagraf 0.5 mmol/ml, gadoteric acid, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) (Fig. 2). The examination showed miliary enhancing intra-axial brain lesions involving supra- and sub-tentorial regions and also the perivascular spaces (PVS), characterized by a bright appearance on unenhanced T1-weighted images without signal hypointensity in T2*-weighted images, as for melanotic pattern. Clear involvement of the meninges had not been identified. Thus, the radiological diagnosis of “carcinomatous encephalitis” was made and the patient was urgently admitted to the Oncology Department. A neurological examination was performed, which showed an alert and cooperative subject with increased reaction time in verbal and motor responses. No ocular motility disturbances were found, and there were no motor or sensory deficits in the four limbs. The finger-to-nose test was normal, and no coordination deficit was found bilaterally. Body temperature and blood tests demonstrated no signs of ongoing infection (body temperature: 35.7 °C; white blood cell count: 5.52 × 103/µl; procalcitonin: 0.11 ng/ml). Electroencephalography showed slow and punctate abnormalities in bilateral fronto-temporal regions, with left prevalence. Corticosteroid therapy (dexamethasone 4 mg) was started during hospitalization, improving the clinical picture. The patient was then discharged after 4 days in good clinical conditions with the indication to start second-line treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab and to perform a whole-brain irradiation.
Discussion
Malignant melanoma frequently metastasizes to the central nervous system (CNS), representing the third most common cause for CNS metastases after breast and lung cancer [6], but only about 5% of the patients with melanoma metastases have more than five intracerebral metastatic lesions [7].
In a recent review, only 26 cases of miliary CNS metastases have been reported and none of these cases were related to melanoma; the most frequent primary tumor was lung (61.54%), followed by breast and unknown origin, with 11.54% each [8].
In general, risk factors for CNS metastases among patients with malignant melanoma are: male, head and neck or oral primary lesion, primary tumor thickness, ulceration of primary lesion and the presence of visceral metastases [7]. Moreover, the introduction of immunotherapies and BRAF/MEK targeted therapies have dramatically improved the survival in patients with metastatic melanoma, thus increasing the time in which CNS complications may manifest [9].
The etiology of CE is not fully known [8], but probably the BRAF V600E mutated could play a role in the onset of CE related to melanoma [5]; other research is needed to assess the possible role of this gene in the CE pathogenesis.
The clinical presentation of miliary brain metastases can vary, but the most frequent symptoms are the cognitive impairment and the subacute dementia. The great variety of symptoms observed is the consequence of the multifocal involvement of cortical and subcortical structures [8, 10]. In general, the median interval from initial diagnosis of malignant melanoma and the onset of neurological symptoms due to CNS involvement is 3.5 years [7]. In our case, neurological findings occurred almost 9 years later and were characterized by cognitive-motor slowing without evidence of focal deficits, improved after corticosteroid administration.
Imaging plays a crucial role for differential diagnosis in patient with neurological symptoms [11, 12] and for the non-invasive diagnosis of CE. The diagnosis is made primarily by contrast-enhanced brain MRI, which has a better sensitivity than contrast-enhanced head CT [5], as seen in our case where MRI showed the actual disease burden. Melanoma brain metastasis may have heterogeneous and different appearances and locations in the head [13, 14], especially in the CNS, with typical (melanotic and amelanotic) and atypical imaging patterns [15]; melanotic pattern consists of lesions with high signal intensity on unenhanced T1-weighted images and low signal intensity on T2-weighted images, mainly due to effects of both free radicals in melanin as well as blood products; amelanotic pattern consists of lesions which are hypointense or isointense to the cortex on unenhanced T1-weighted images and hyperintense or isointense to the cortex on T2-weighted images. In CE, lesions are usually small and distributed ubiquitously, with the predominant involvement of the cortical grey matter and of the basal ganglia, as seen in our case. In all cases, administration of contrast agent to demonstrate enhancement of lesions is essential.
Miliary enhancement is generally used to describe a pattern of multiple punctate uniform enhancement with monomorphic dot-like lesions (diameter < 3 mm) and this pattern may be related to several pathologies such as metastatic disease (such as CE), CNS lymphoma, neurosarcoidosis, Erdheim–Chester disease, vitamin B12 deficiency, CNS vasculitis, chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, glial fibrillary acidic protein meningoencephalomyelitis, Behçet’s disease, infectious disease and Susac’s syndrome. In a recent review a diagnostic algorithm in patient with brain miliary enhancement is proposed to narrow down differential diagnoses and to minimize the use of invasive diagnostic procedures [16]. In many of these cases, the diagnosis is radiological according to age, sociodemographic information, medical history and physical examination, imaging findings (localization, PVS involvement, hemorrhagic lesions, meningeal enhancement, spinal cord involvement) and the responsiveness in variable degrees to corticosteroid therapy. In particular, in adult populations, metastases presenting as diffuse miliary spread of punctate tumor nodules within or outside PVS (as in our case) should always be considered in the differential diagnosis before thinking about less frequent pathologies. In our case, moreover, the presence of lesion’s signal hyperintensity on unenhanced T1-weighted sequences without signs of bleeding on T2*-weighted sequences, further confirmed the radiological diagnosis of melanoma metastases.
In general, miliary brain metastases are associated with a poor prognosis; the survival in terms of duration and quality of life depends on the extent of metastatic disease and response to treatment. Due to its low incidence, there are currently no guidelines for CE treatment. Melanoma brain metastases can be treated with surgery and/or stereotactic radiosurgery, but only when the disease is limited to few lesions; treatment for patients with multiple metastases includes whole-brain irradiation and immunotherapy [7, 17].
In conclusion, miliary brain metastases should be suspected in all melanoma patients with new neurological findings and contrast-enhanced MRI should be performed to assess the real burden of the disease.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Abbreviations
- CNS:
-
Central nervous system
- CE:
-
Carcinomatous encephalitis
- WB-CT:
-
Whole-body computed tomography
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- PVS:
-
Perivascular spaces
References
Markovic SN, Erickson LA, Rao RD, Weenig RH, Pockaj BA, Bardia A, et al. Malignant melanoma in the 21st century, part 1: epidemiology, risk factors, screening, prevention, and diagnosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(3):364–80.
Madow L, Alpers BJ. Encephalitic form of metastatic carcinoma. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1951;65(2):161–73.
Rainov NG, Burkert W. Miliary brain metastases from malignant melanoma. Zentralbl Neurochir. 1996;57(1):20–4.
Marsot-Dupuch K, Michel G, Baudrimont M, Amarenco P. The value of MRI in a case of cerebro-meningeal miliary carcinomatosis of melanotic origin. Ann Radiol (Paris). 1989;32(4):293–7.
Reiter FP, Giessen-Jung C, Dorostkar MM, Ertl-Wagner B, Denk GU, Heck S, et al. Miliary pattern of brain metastases—a case report of a hyperacute onset in a patient with malignant melanoma documented by magnetic resonance imaging. Radiat Oncol. 2015;19(10):148.
Sarbu N, Pujol T, Oleaga L. Hyperintense perilesional edema in the brain on T1-weighted images: cavernous malformation or metastatic melanoma? Three case reports and literature review. Neuroradiol J. 2016;29(1):52–6.
Goulart CR, Mattei TA, Ramina R. Cerebral melanoma metastases: a critical review on diagnostic methods and therapeutic options. ISRN Surg. 2011;2011: 276908.
Santos Vázquez G, Garcia Cázarez R, Moreno Pizarro E, Serrano Padilla AE, Plascencia Salcedo JC. Central nervous system miliary brain metastasis secondary to breast cancer. Cureus. 2020;12(8): e9649.
Cohen JV, Tawbi H, Margolin KA, Amravadi R, Bosenberg M, Brastianos PK, et al. Melanoma central nervous system metastases: current approaches, challenges, and opportunities. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2016;29(6):627–42.
Rivas E, Sanchez-Herrero J, Alonso M, Alvarez MJ, Teijeira S, Ballestín C, et al. Miliary brain metastases presenting as rapidly progressive dementia. Neuropathology. 2005;25(2):153–8.
Parillo M, Quattrocchi CC, Pilato F, Di Lazzaro V, Beomonte ZB. Whole-body computed tomography as first-line imaging procedure to exclude cancer in patients with neurological suspicion of paraneoplastic syndromes: shall clinical practice adhere to recommendations? Radiography (Lond). 2022;29(1):8–13.
Parillo M, Vaccarino F, Quattrocchi CC. Imaging findings in a case of leptomeningeal myelomatosis, a rare but critical central nervous system complication of multiple myeloma. Neuroradiol J. 2023;10:19714009221150850.
Harkness KA, Manford MRA. Metastatic malignant melanoma presenting as a cavernous sinus syndrome. J Neurol. 2004;251(2):224–5.
Schneider M, Höltje J, Kehler U, Hartmann V, Holl-Ullrich K, Oechel K, et al. Malignant perivascular melanoma mimicking primary central nervous system vasculitis. J Neurol. 2013;260(2):680–4.
Escott EJ. A variety of appearances of malignant melanoma in the head: a review. Radiographics. 2001;21(3):625–39.
Bot JCJ, Mazzai L, Hagenbeek RE, Ingala S, van Oosten B, Sanchez-Aliaga E, et al. Brain miliary enhancement. Neuroradiology. 2020;62(3):283–300.
Aizer AA, Lamba N, Ahluwalia MS, Aldape K, Boire A, Brastianos PK, et al. Brain metastases: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol. 2022;24(10):1613–46.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MP and DV drafted the manuscript. CAM and CCQ revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval was waived by the local Ethics Committee in view of the descriptive nature of the study and all the procedures being performed were part of the routine care.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent for the use of existing anonymized data for research purposes was obtained from the patient as an institutional policy.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Parillo, M., Vertulli, D., Mallio, C.A. et al. Imaging findings in carcinomatous encephalitis secondary to malignant melanoma. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 59, 76 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-023-00677-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-023-00677-9