Skip to main content

A hospital-based study of post-stroke aphasia: frequency, risk factors, and topographic representation

Abstract

Background and objective

The crude prevalence rate of stroke in Qena, Egypt, is high (922/100,000). For the first time, we estimate the frequency of aphasia following the first-ever ischemic stroke and its relationship to the site of lesion in Arabic-speaking countries.

Methods

The study was conducted on 180 acute or subacute ischemic stroke patients. Aphasia was diagnosed with the short form of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination after establishment of the cases (at least 10 days of stroke onset). Computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging were performed for topographic localization of stroke, and routine laboratory investigations were done to evaluate the possible stroke risk factors.

Results

The frequency of post-stroke aphasia was recorded in 20%, and atrial fibrillation (AF) represents a high-risk factor for ischemic stroke with aphasia. The following categories were observed: global aphasia in 50%, motor aphasia in 27.7%, sensory aphasia in 11.1%, nominal aphasia in 2.8%, and conductive aphasia in 8.3%. Global aphasia was mainly associated with complete middle cerebral artery (MCA) territories infarction. Motor aphasia was associated mainly with frontal or frontoparietal operculum lesions as well as basal ganglionic lesions. Sensory aphasia was associated with temporal lobe lesions, inferior parietal lobe, and basal ganglia. Conductive aphasia showed lesions in the deep white matter of the frontal and parietal lobes. Anomic aphasia was associated with inferior parietal lobe lesion.

Conclusion

Our data are consistent with other reports as regards the frequency and risk factors of post-stroke aphasia. Atrial fibrillation represents a high-risk factor for ischemic strokes with aphasia. Global and motor aphasia are the major subtypes. The lesion locations are predictive of aphasia subtypes.

Introduction

Stroke is a major health problem in our country with the crude prevalence rate of stroke in Assiut and Qena being 963–922/ 100,000 [1, 2]. Most people survive a first stroke, although most are left with significant morbidity. Indeed, stroke is the most common cause of aphasia due to damage to the language network of the brain. These include Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas in the left hemisphere and homologous areas in the right side of the brain, the prefrontal and premotor areas in the frontal regions, and the lower part of the parietal region [3, 4]. However, positron emission tomography (PET), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and the magnetoencephalography showed that these areas in both hemispheres of the brain are activated specifically during language tasks, as well as activation of more distant areas of cortex [5].

It has been estimated that about 21–38% of stroke patients develop aphasia [6, 7]. The reported annual incidence of post-stroke aphasia in Europe and the United States of America (USA) is 43–60 per 100,000 [8,9,10].

It has been reported that 20–40% of aphasias are of the global type, whereas the classic aphasia types, such as Broca’s or Wernicke’s aphasia, are found in a quarter of patients, and 10–15% of patients are unclassifiable according to traditional typologies during the acute stage of stroke [11]. Literature concerning the frequency of post-stroke aphasia, risk factors, and the relations between aphasia type and lesion location are limited, especially in Egypt.

The aim of this study is to estimate the frequency and risk factors of post-stroke aphasia, following the first-ever ischemic stroke, and to study the relations of type of aphasia and lesions location of stroke Egypt. This is the first time that aphasia epidemiology is being studied in Arabic-speaking countries.

Subjects and methods

Study design

The study was conducted on 180 ischemic strokes. They recruited consecutively from outpatient clinic during the period from first of October 2015 to end of March 2016. All patients were admitted to the Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, South Valley University Hospital, Qena, Egypt. Stroke was defined according to World Health Organization (WHO) as a syndrome of rapidly developing clinical signs of focal or global disturbance of cerebral function, with symptoms lasting 24 h or longer with no apparent cause other than of vascular origin [12]. Each patient fulfilled the definition of stroke with or without aphasia and was documented by computed tomography of the brain (ischemic infarction) with acute or subacute onset (ranging from first day to 30 days after the onset) included. Exclusion criteria were as follows: comatose patients, patients with metabolic disorders, patients with history of head injury or neurological disease other than stroke, or patients with previous history of disturbed speech or hearing (e.g., deafness or deaf mute).

Clinical assessment after establishment of stroke was as follows (at least 10 days of stroke onset till the end of first month after the onset): a detailed history and neurological examination was performed for each patient. Motor strength and the language assessment section of the Hemispheric Stroke Scale (HSS) [13] were evaluated for each patient together with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) [14] which assesses the functional disability of each patient. Aphasia was diagnosed with the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Test—short form.

Type of aphasia was diagnosed as follows [15]:

  1. 1.

    Paraphasias

    Incorrect substitutions of words or parts of words

    1. (a)

      Literal or phonemic paraphasias: similar sounds (e.g., “sound” for “found” or “fen” for “pen”)

    2. (b)

      Verbal or semantic paraphasias: word substituted for another form same semantic class (e.g., “fork” for “spoon” or “pen” for “pencil”).

  2. 2.

    Broca’s aphasia

    Motor aphasia, problems with output; understanding intact, nonfluent, hesitant, labored, and paraphasic speaking, vocabulary and confrontation naming is severely impaired, and writing is similarly affected

  3. 3.

    Anomic aphasia

    Mild motor aphasia, problem with output; understanding intact, word-finding difficulties, or mild articulatory errors (often called verbal apraxia)

  4. 4.

    Transcortical motor aphasia

    Stroke is located in the frontal lobe, anterior or superior to Broca’s area or in the subcortical region deep to Broca’s area, characterized by nonfluent (reduced rate of speech and limited language output), good comprehension and good repetition.

  5. 5.

    Wernicke’s aphasia

    Sensory aphasia, problem with input, fluent speech with severe comprehension deficit, poor repetition and often unintelligible jargon; reading is similarly affected and associated with marked paraphasias and neologisms.

  6. 6.

    Transcortical sensory aphasia

    Watershed stroke isolating the perisylvian speech structures (Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas) from the posterior brain, characterized by fluent speech (neologisms) and poor comprehension and good repetition (possibly echolalia).

  7. 7.

    Conduction aphasia

    Stroke of the parietal operculum (arcuate fasciculus) or insula or deep to the supramarginal gyrus characterized by disproportional impairment in repeating spoken languages and literal paraphasias with “targeting” of words (until getting the right one).

  8. 8.

    Global aphasia

    Motor and sensory aphasia, problem with input and output, no communication even with gestures and no speech or only stereotypical repetitive utterances, reading and writing affected, and generally involve the entire middle cerebral artery (MCA) region with moderate to severe impairment of language of all language function.

    Computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed for topographic localization of stroke. Echocardiography and electrocardiography and routine laboratory investigations were performed to evaluate the possible risk factors for aphasia.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS 16.0 software. Qualitative data were described in frequency using percentage (%). Continuous variables were expressed in mean ± standard deviation (SD). Comparative statistical analysis between variables was done using chi-square for qualitative data and independent t test for continuous variables. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Thirty six patients out of 180 ischemic stroke patients (20%) had aphasia. The mean age ± SD for patients with aphasia in ischemic stroke was 55.8 ± 10.6 compared with 56.29 ± 9.92 years for non-aphasic patients (P > 0.05). The mean total NIHSS ± SD for patients with ischemic stroke with aphasia was 18.36 ± 2.88 which was significantly higher than in patients without aphasia (6.97 ± 3. 0) (P value = 0.00). There was no significant association between aphasia and sex. Only two patients with aphasia were left handed and had right ischemic infarction (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographical data of all cases of stroke

There were no significant differences between patients with aphasia and patients without aphasia in any of the risk factors associated with stroke except in ischemic heart disease and atrial fibrillation (IHD and AF) with a significantly higher percentage of both factors in aphasic patients (Table 2).

Table 2 Risk factors of 180 ischemic stroke patients in relation to the presence or absence of aphasia Parameter

Interestingly, we found the commonest type of aphasia was global aphasia (n = 18(50%). Other types of aphasia were as follows: motor aphasia (n = 10 (27.7%)), sensory aphasia (n = 4 (11.1%)), nominal aphasia (n = 1 (2.8%)), and conductive aphasia (n = 3 (8.3%)).

Seventeen patients out of 36 (47.2%) patients performed MRI brain study, and the remaining cases underwent CT brain study. Neuroimaging details of each type of aphasia are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Radiological site of lesions of 36 cases of ischemic stroke with aphasia

Only two patients (5.5%) in our population had CT evidence of right-sided infarction and both patients were left handed, suggestive of right hemisphere language lateralization.

Discussion

Aphasia is one of the most important causes of disability in post-stroke cases. This is the first study in Arabic-speaking population aimed to estimate the frequency and risk factors of aphasia following the first-ever ischemic stroke Egyptian patients. Estimations of the frequency of pure aphasia types vary from 20–30% [16, 17] to almost 100% [18]. In the present study, the incidence of aphasia following first ever ischemic stroke cases was 20% which was similar to others [9, 19,20,21,22,23]. It was lower than that reported by Pedersen et al. [24], Kauhanen et al. [25] and Engelter et al. [8], all of whom reported an incidence above 30%, while Berthier et al. [10] reported a very high incidence of 80%. Conversely, a very low incidence (10.3%) was reported by Naess et al. [26]. The differences between studies may relate to the inclusion criteria as some reported the incidence after first ever stroke while others reported the incidence after single or multiple strokes.

In the present study, there was no significant difference between male and females in relation to the presence or absence of aphasia. The educational level had no relation to the occurrence of aphasia in agreement with other studies [27, 28].

Language function is almost exclusively the domain of the left hemisphere, except for 35% of left handers (3% of population) who use the right hemisphere for language function [29]. In the strongly left-handed subjects, 73.7% had left-side language cerebral dominance, 15.8% had bilateral cerebral representation, and 10.5% had right-side cerebral language dominance [29]. In the present study, only two left handed patients had aphasia one of them had right frontoparietal operculum and the insula (MCA territory) and the other had massive right frontoparietal infarction (MCA occlusion) that confirm the previous results.

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) tended to present more often with aphasia (22.2 vs. 7.6%) and were more severely impaired. Similar results have been reported by several other groups [8, 22, 30,31,32]. AF is associated with a higher risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events and more severe ischemic strokes [33,34,35].

Epidemiological studies have found increased risk of stroke associated with other risk factors, including cardiovascular abnormalities such as coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), and atrial fibrillation (AF) [36]. In the Framingham study, the age-adjusted 2-year incidence of stroke was more than double in the presence of CAD, more than triple in the presence of hypertension, more than quadruple in the presence of HF, and nearly quintupled when AF was present [37]. In the present study, we also found a significant association between IHD and poststroke aphasia which may be indirectly related to association between IHD and AF.

In the present study, global aphasia was the most common (50.5%) followed by motor (27.8%) and sensory aphasia (11.1%). Both conductive and nominal aphasia were uncommon and were found in only 8.3% and 2.8% respectively. Our results are similar to many other studies which found that both global and motor aphasia are the major subtypes [30, 37,38,39].

Most patients with global aphasia in our study had extensive cortical and subcortical damage in the whole region supplied by the MCA. Thus, both Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas, along with underlying white matter and basal ganglia connections, were damaged. However, a few cases with global aphasia showed only localized lesions either involving the frontal or the parietal lobe. The presence of associated hypo-perfusion in the adjacent regions, which could have been compensated from other major arterial territories or collateral circulation, might explain the global aphasia despite the absence of diffuse detectable lesions on CT. Perfusion imaging, however, may be required in order to support this postulation. Additionally, different neuroimaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies further showed that premotor and motor areas can be linked to speech perception [40, 41] as well as speech production [42, 43]. Therefore, lesions in such regions may affect the language network and contribute to aphasic deficits whether sensory, motor, or global. This is, however, less likely in our cases since the main perception center was preserved.

In the present study, patients who presented with motor aphasia exhibited lesions involving the left frontal operculum and the insula. Some cases showed, in addition, extension to the parietal operculum whereas others showed more diffuse extension to the left dorsolateral frontal lobe to involve the motor and premotor areas. Aphasia in such patients is explained by injury of the inferior frontal gurus encompassing pars opercularis and pars triangularis (Broca’s area) thus causing the classic Broca’s (motor) aphasia [44, 45]. The extension to the parietal operculum may also partially contribute to the speech production deficits, as it has been shown that cortical lesions of the inferior parietal lobe can cause repetition impairment [46]. Additionally, involvement of the enclosed white matter, the arcuate fasciculus, can cause repetition impairment [47]. As mentioned above, a number of studies showed that premotor and motor areas can be linked to speech production [42, 43]. Therefore, lesions in such regions may further contribute to the motor aphasia.

Previous studies investigated the role of basal ganglia region as well as the thalamus in language production [48,49,50]. Despite the contradictory views in this concern, the majority appear to suggest that lesions involving these regions affect the fluency of the speech [49] rather than comprehension [51]. Our data is consistent with this, as we found three cases with lenticulocapsular lesions presented with motor aphasia and only one patient with lenticular infraction presented with sensory aphasia. Disruption of basal ganglionic networks to any of the cortical speech area could be responsible for the aphasic deficits in those patients. In accordance with this hypothesis, other studies revealed a direct functional connectivity between the putamen and Broca’s area [50]. Furthermore, a direct anatomical pathway between Putamen and inferior frontal lobe [52, 53], as well as between the putamen and the motor and premotor regions, have been reported using diffusion tensor imaging [54], demonstrating the role of basal ganglia, particularly, the putamen in the process of speech production.

Patients in our study with sensory aphasia had lesions involving mainly the left temporal lobe, with some cases having involvement of the inferior parietal lobe. Damage of the Wernicke area (superior temporal gyrus) is most probably responsible for the sensory aphasia in those patients [55]. These mentioned data are partially matched to some extent with previous results [56].

We also had three cases of conductive aphasia with a picture of extensive small vessel ischemic changes and involvement of the periventricular and deep white matter (WM) of both frontal and parietal lobes bilaterally. This is most likely due to interruption of the connection between the anterior and posterior speech areas secondary to an injury of the long segment of the arcuate fasciculus [47], hence a disconnection syndrome between the Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas [55]. Dwidar et al. conducted a study on 70 acute ischemic stroke patients with aphasia affecting the dominant hemisphere; they reported that aphasia is not a pure cortical function as deep periventricular white matter and insular area in the dominant hemisphere play an important role in many language tasks [57].

One patient in the present study had anomic aphasia with ischemic lesions in the left posterior inferior parietal lobe. Many brain regions in the literature have been reported to be related to the anomia. Inconsistent with our results, other studies, however, showed anomia is more common with lesions to other regions such as occipital lobe [58], occipitotemporal area (Brodmann area 37), and the premotor area of the frontal lobe [59], as well the thalamus [49, 60], and less likely related to the striatocapsular region [51].

Main limitations of this study are the small sample size and lack of MRI study in some cases.

Conclusions

Despite remarkable differences between western languages and Arabic, the frequency and risk factors of post-stroke aphasia as well as lesion localization are similar. Global and motor aphasia were the major subtypes.

Our data are consistent with other reports in most of the cases which showed that the lesion locations were compatible with and predictive of the type of aphasia [35, 37, 58, 60], yet there was a wide degree of overlap between the distribution pattern of brain damage and the aphasia type with some unexpected findings.

Abbreviations

AF:

Atrial fibrillation

CT:

Computed tomography

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

fMRI:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

HF:

Heart failure

HSS:

Hemispheric Stroke Scale

IHD:

Ischemic heart disease

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

MCA:

Middle cerebral artery

NIHSS:

National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

PET:

Positron emission tomography

SD:

Standard deviation

USA:

United States of America

WM:

White matter

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. 1.

    Khedr EM, Elfetoh NA, Al Attar G, Ahmed MA, Ali AM, Hamdy A, Kandil MR, Farweez H. Epidemiological study and risk factors of stroke in Assiut Governorate, Egypt: community-based study. Neuroepidemiology. 2013;40(4):288–94.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Khedr EM, Fawi G, Abdela M, Mohammed TA, Ahmed MA, El-Fetoh NA, Zaki AF. Prevalence of ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes in Qena Governorate, Egypt: community-based study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23(7):1843–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Frey S, Campbell JS, Pike GB, Petrides M. Dissociating the human language pathways with high angular resolution diffusion fiber tractography. J Neurosci. 2008;28:11435–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Vigneau M, Beaucousin V, Hervé PY, Duffau H, Crivello F, Houdé O, Mazoyer B, Tzourio-Mazoyer N. Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage. 2006;30:1414–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hillis AE. Aphasia: progress in the last quarter of a century. Baltimore: John Hopkins University School of Medicine; 2007. (Supported by NIH (NIDCD) from AAN Enterprises, Inc.)

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wade DT, Hewer RL, David RM, Enderby PM. Aphasia after stroke: natural history and associated deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986;49(1):11–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nadamuni S. Researchers identify stroke subtypes in India. Lancet. 2002;359:500.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Engelter ST, Gostynski M, Papa S, Frei M, Born C, Ajdacic-Gross V, Gutzwiller F, Lyrer PA. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke. 2006;37:1379–84.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, Fang J, Rowland A, Black S. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2010;91:196–202.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Berthier ML, Pulvermüller F, Dávila G, Casares NG, Gutiérrez A. Drug therapy of post-stroke aphasia: a review of current evidence. Neuropsychol Rev. 2011;21(3):302–17.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS. Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17:35–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wolf PA, Kannel WB, Dawber TR. Prospective investigations: the Framingham study and the epidemiology of stroke. Adv Neurol. 1978;19:107–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Adams RJ, Meador KJ, Sethi KD, Grotta JC, Thomson DS. Graded neurologic scale for use in acute hemispheric stroke treatment protocols. Stroke. 1987;18:665–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Arler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Teasell R and Hussein N (2018) 2.Clinical consequences of stroke [evidence based review of stroke rehabilitation] (www.ebrsr.com )

  16. 16.

    Prins RS, Snow CE, Wagenaar E. Recovery from aphasia: spontaneous speech versus language comprehension. Brain and language. 1978;6:192–211.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Albert ML, Olber LK, Goodglass H. Helm NA. Alexander MP. Clinical aspects of dysphasia. Wien/ New York. Springer Verlag: Rubens AB; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    De Renzi E, Faglioni P, Ferrari P. The influence of sex and age on the incidence and type of aphasia. Cortex. 1980;16(4):627–30.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Erin L, Erin C. Aphasia: a description of the incidence and management in the acute hospital setting/ lournal. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing. 2004;9(2):129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Laska AC, Hellblom A, Murray V, Kahan T, Von Arbin M. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2001;249(5):413–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Law J, Huby G, Irving A-M, Pringle A-M, Conochie D, Haworth C, Burston A. Reconciling the perspective of practitioner and service user: findings from the Aphasia in Scotland Study. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 2010;45(5):551–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tsouli S, Kyritsis AP, Tsagalis G, Virvidaki E, Vemmos KN. Significance of aphasia after first-ever acute stroke: impact on early and late outcomes. Neuroepidemiology. 2009;33:96–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Vidović M, Sinanović O, Sabaskić L, Haticić A, Brkić E. Incidence and types of speech disorders in stroke patients. Acta Clin. Croat. 2011;50:491–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Pedersen PM, Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann. Neurol. 1995;38:659–566.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kauhanen ML, Korpelainen JT, Hiltunen P, Määttä R, Mononen H, Brusin E, Sotaniemi KA, Myllylä VV. Aphasia, depression, and non-verbal cognitive impairment in ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2000;10:455–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Naess H, Hammersvik L, Skeie GO. Aphasia among young patients with ischemic stroke on long-term follow-up. J Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2009;18(4):247–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Connor LT, Obler LK, Tocco M, Fitzpatrick PM, Albert ML. Effect of socioeconomic status on aphasia severity and recovery. Brain Lang. 2001;78(2):254–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lazar RM, Speizer AE, Festa JR, Krakauer JW, Marshall RS. Variability in language recovery after first-time stroke. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2008;79(5):530–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Khedr EM, Hamed E, Said A, Basahi J. Handedness and language cerebral lateralization. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;87(4-5):469–73.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Croquelois A, Bogousslavsky J. Stroke aphasia: 1,500 consecutive cases. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;31(4):392–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Fennis TF, Compter A, van den Broek MW, Koudstaal PJ, Algra A, Koehler PJ. Is isolated aphasia a typical presentation of presumed cardioembolic transient ischemic attack or stroke? Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35:337–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lamassa M, Di Carlo A, Pracucci G, Basile AM, Trefoloni G, Vanni P, Spolveri S, Baruffi MC, Landini G, Ghetti A, Wolfe CD, Inzitari D. Characteristics, outcome, and care of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation in Europe: data from a multicenter multinational hospital-based registry (The European Community Stroke Project). Stroke. 2001;32(2):392–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Aguilar MI, Hart R, Pearce LA. Oral anticoagulants versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and no history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks. Cochrane Database. Syst Rev. 2007;3:CD006186.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation: a major contributor to stroke in the elderly. The Framingham Study. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:1561–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern SM, Ho M, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lloyd-Jones D, McDermott M, Meigs J, Moy C, Nichol G, O'Donnell C, Roger V, Sorlie P, Steinberger J, Thom T, Wilson M, Hong Y; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2008; 117:e25–e146.

  36. 36.

    Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22:983–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Hayward RW, Naeser MA, Zatz LM. Cranial computed tomography in aphasia: correlation of anatomical lesions with functional deficits. Radiology. 1977;123(3):653–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Godefroy O, Dubois C, Debachy B, Leclerc M, Kreisler A. Lille Stroke Program. Vascular aphasias: main characteristics of patients hospitalized in acute stroke units. Stroke. 2002;33(3):702–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bohra V, Khwaja GA, Jain S, Duggal A, Ghuge VV, Srivastava A. Clinicoanatomical correlation in stroke related aphasia. Ann. Indian Acad. Neurol. 2015;18(4):424–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Meister IG, Wilson SM, Deblieck C, Wu AD, Iacoboni M. The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception. Current Biology. 2007;17(19):1692–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lacoboni M. The role of premotor cortex in speech perception: evidence from fMRI and rTMS. Journal of Physiology-Paris. 2008;102(1-3):31–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Meinzer M, Lindenberg R, Sieg MM, Nachtigall L, Ulm L, Flöel A. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex improves word-retrieval in older adults. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2014;6:253.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Benjamin ML, Towler S, Garcia A, Park H, Sudhyadhom A, Harnish S, McGregor KM, Zlatar Z, Reilly JJ, Rosenbek JC, Gonzalez Rothi LJ, Crosson B. A behavioral manipulation engages right frontal cortex during aphasia therapy Neurorehabil Neural. Repair. 2014;28(6):545–53.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Broca PP. Loss of speech, chronic softening and partial destruction of the anterior left lobe of the brain. Trans. revised. 2003.

  45. 45.

    Dronkers NF. A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature. 1996;384(6605):159–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Quigg M, Geldmacher DS, Elias WJ. Conduction aphasia as a function of the dominant posterior perisylvian cortex. Report of two cases. J. Neurosurg. 2006;104(5):845–648.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Catani M, Jones DK. Perisylvian language networks of the human brain. Annals of Neurology. 2005;57(1):8–16.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Radanovic M, Mansur LL. Aphasia in vascular lesions of the basal ganglia: a comprehensive review. Brain and language. 2017;173:20–32.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zenon A, Olivier E. Contribution of the basal ganglia to spoken language: is speech production like the other motor skills? Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2014;37(6):576.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Booth JR, Wood L, Lu D, Houk JC, Bitan T. The role of the basal ganglia and cerebellum in language processing. Brain research. 2007;1133:136–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kuljic-Obradovic DC. Subcortical aphasia: three different language disorder syndromes? European Journal of Neurology. 2003;10(4):445–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Lehéricy S, Ducros M, Van De Moortele PF, Francois C, Thivard L, Poupon C, Swindale N, Ugurbil K, Kim DS. Diffusion tensor fiber tracking shows distinct corticostriatal circuits in humans. Annals of Neurology. 2004;55(4):522–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Ford A, Triplett W, Sudhyadhom A, Gullett J, McGregor K, Fitzgerald DB, Mareci T, White K, Crosson B. Broca's area and its striatal and thalamic connections: a diffusion-MRI tractography study. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy. 2013;7:8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Leh SE, Petrides M, Strafella AP. The neural circuitry of executive functions in healthy subjects and Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35(1):70–85.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Geschwind N. Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. In: Selected papers on language and the brain. Springer, Dordrecht. 1974:105–236.

  56. 56.

    Emam A. The diagnostic role of neuroradiology in dysphasic patients. Cairo: Ain Shams University; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Dwidar AAZ, Alloush TK, Abou El-Ella MY, Ahmed NSE, Maher KM, Nada MAM, Ibrahim MH. Clinical and radiological localization of language dysfunctions in acute ischemic stroke. Open Journal of Medical Imaging. 2014;4:80–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kraft A, Grimsen C, Kehrer S, Bahnemann M, Spang K, Prass M, Irlbacher K, Köhnlein M, Lipfert A, Brunner F, Kastrup A, Fahle M, Brandt SA. Neurological and neuropsychological characteristics of occipital, occipito-temporal and occipito-parietal infarction. Cortex. 2014;56:38–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Foundas AL, Daniels SK, Vasterling JJ. Anomia: case studies with lesion localization. Neurocase. 1998;4(1):35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    ÖZTÜRK Ş, Fahrettin EG, Ekmekci H. Language disorders due to posterior system strokes-an ignored dysfunction. Nöro Psikiyatri Arşivi. 2014;51(4):313.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EMK, MAA, AF, AG, and MA contributed to study concept and design, acquisition of data, draft and revision of the report, statistical analyses, and interpretation of data. NAE, AFZ, MAA, and AG contributed to the case recruitments, acquisition of data, and statistical analyses. RKS contributed to the interpretation of neuroradiology data and draft and revision of the report. EMK, RKS, and NAE contributed to the editing of this report. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eman M. Khedr.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

An informed consent was obtained from all the patients before participating in the study. The protocol was approved in January 2014 by the South Valley Medical School.

Ethical Review Board and all participants or relatives gave written informed consent before participation in the study. The confidentiality of the patients’ information was maintained during all the steps of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khedr, E.M., Abbass, M.A., Soliman, R.K. et al. A hospital-based study of post-stroke aphasia: frequency, risk factors, and topographic representation. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 56, 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-019-0128-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Aphasia
  • Ischemic stroke
  • Hospital-based study
  • Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination test
  • National Institute of Health Stroke Scale