Skip to main content
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
Download PDF

Investigating alexithymia, empathy, and resilience in medical students during pandemic era: a cross-sectional study in northern Iran

The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery volume 60, Article number: 119 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background and aim

Alexithymia is defined as emotional response inhibition. As well, empathy refers to the ability to put oneself in someone’s position and resilience is the capacity to recover from a series of negative emotional experiences. Considering the psychological distress induced by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic together with academic stress and the role of empathy in physician–patient relationships, the present study was to investigate alexithymia, empathy, and resilience in Iranian medical interns and residents.

Materials and methods

This cross-sectional study was fulfilled in northern Iran in 2021–2022. In total, 394 medical interns and residents were initially recruited for this purpose. Then, an online sociodemographic survey form (SDSF), the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE), the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), and the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) were completed. The data analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics (ver.26) software in regard to the p < 0.05 significance level.

Results

The mean age of the study participants was 28.8 ± 5.00. As well, 38.1% of these individuals were male, 62.2% of the cases were single, and 54.6% of them were medical interns. The mean value of empathy, resilience and alexithymia was 89.90 ± 14.00, 49.75 ± 10.56, and 46.40 ± 16.40, respectively. No significant relationship was found between empathy and educational level (p = 0.532). As well, medical interns empathy and resilience than residents (p = 0.000 & p = 0.000, respectively). Besides, male participants had more empathy and resilience (p = 0.000 & p = 0.007).

Conclusion

Low empathy and resilience in medical interns and residents, especially in women who make up the majority of them, can be a warning for health care in Iran.

Introduction

Mental health is nowadays among the foremost components of quality of life in individuals and societies. As acknowledged, healthy and efficient members, namely, those who are balanced in terms of their mental and physical conditions, are assumed as the keys to progress and dynamism in all societies [1]. The academic years for medical students may be accompanied by many challenges and consequently hamper their academic performance [2].

Among the significant contributing factors in this respect, resilience has been defined as the ability to reach positive psychophysiological outcomes regardless of being subjected to adverse and stressful situations. It also refers to someone’s capacity to pick up from persistent difficulties and restore oneself. This concept has been thus far utilized from both physiological and psychological aspects [3]. There are many factors such as age, gender, culture, views toward life, and personality traits in the formation of resilience in people [4]. As highlighted in loads of articles, resilience has been further pictured as flexible adaptation in the face of existing challenges at individual and social levels. It has been additionally described as a set of characteristics demonstrated by individuals over a period of time in order to succeed, live, and grow positively even with stressors or hard times [5]. This definition with its own dynamic nature accordingly helps distinguish quality from some psychological features, such as mental toughness [6, 7]. Martin and Marsh [8] in a series of studies at schools found a significant relationship between academic achievement and students’ perceptions and behaviors, and then grouped the main dimensions of resilience into self-confidence or self-efficacy, coordination and planning, summary control, calmness mastery, and commitment and persistence [8]. In practice, the students with high resilience are supposed to have positive effects on the existing situations, and even control or influence some components of the academic system. Due to this characteristic, their continuous efforts are constructive and they can deal with inevitable and potentially threatening events without worrying or withdrawing [8]. As evidenced, medical students must thus brace themselves for various challenges not only in practice but also during training [9].

Emotions are the most important internal states that encourage adaptive behavioral outputs [10], and alexithymia has been also characterized by impairment in someone’s ability to identify, understand, and describe one’s feelings [11]. It is typically observed in patients with psychiatric disorders that often reduce their resilience [12]. In a dominant model, alexithymia is attributed to an extroverted cognitive style and the difficulty in expressing emotions and sharing one’s feelings through words [13]. If there are no neuropsychiatric disorders, alexithymia rarely changes across the lifespan in non-clinical populations, i.e., it is a relatively stable psychological trait [14, 15]. The interventions tapped for the treatment of depressive symptoms can be helpful in this line, and the variations in the levels of alexithymia are typically linked to the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments or psychotherapeutic approaches for depression [16, 17]. Alexithymia can be further seen as a spectrum from low to high in the general population, but then develop into clinical pathologies [18]. As an illustration, a negative correlation has been so far spotted between alexithymia and resilience in Chinese armed forces and Iranian students [19, 20].

On the other hand, in the medical literature, empathy has been introduced as the basis of medicine, which has numerous benefits for patients and physicians [21]. In psychiatry, an empathic attitude accordingly allows therapists to reach valuable subjective information about their patients. Seeking to understand patients’ feeling, expressing interest and showing concerns have very positive effects on physician–patient relationships [22]. Also, physicians who express empathic concerns for their patients are less likely to be prosecuted for unprofessional conduct [23,24,25]. Accordingly, adding brief empathic statements related to the scenarios taken out of emergency departments had resulted in a significant decrease in patients’ thoughts about legal processes and lawsuits [26]. Empathic feedback in the form of positive and sympathetic comments significantly relieves the intensity of the pain experienced compared to neutral and non-sympathetic comments [27, 28]. Empathy can also be an effective factor in resilience. In this manner, empathy refers to the ability to experience the feelings of others and achieve cognitive adaptation to promote better interpersonal relationships. There are also some clues suggesting a reciprocal relationship between empathy and resilience; however, a significant correlation between both concepts is even now doubtful [12].

Resilience, which seems to be associated with individuals’ long-term ability to survive and thrive during adversities, appears to be grossly underestimated in clinical education.

Research objectives

According to what was mentioned, it seems that dyslexia, empathy, and resilience should be addressed in medical students as one of the groups that face many problems especially during the epidemic of dangerous diseases, to promote their mental health. According to the few researches that have been conducted on these three variables simultaneously on the target population in Iran, the present study was conducted in order to investigate alexithymia, empathy, and resilience in medical interns and residents in northern Iran during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Materials and methods

Statistical population

The statistical population consisted of interns and residents in various fields and specialties, delivering medical services at the teaching hospitals affiliated to Mazandaran and Babol Universities of Medical Sciences, in northern Iran in 2021–2022.

Design

This study with a descriptive cross-sectional design was conducted using the relevant self-administered questionnaires.

Ethical considerations

While complying with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, this study started upon obtaining the permission from the Vice-Chancellor’s Office for Research and Technology at Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. All the samples were informed about the research objectives and were assured that their participation would be on a voluntary basis, and their personal information would remain confidential.

Statistical population

To estimate the sample size, the results of the study by Morice-Ramat et al. were used. In this study, the degree of correlation between resilience and empathy was 0.3. To determine the sample size using the sample size estimation formula, with the aim of calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient, according to the findings of that study, considering the confidence interval (CI)α of 95% (α = 0.05), and the 90% test power (β = 0.20), the expected correlation coefficient (r = 0.02) for both area of the test, 185 people were estimated. The questionnaires were distributed electronically to all members of the research community, and finally 394 questionnaires were completed.

Inclusion criteria

Medical interns and residentswith Iranian nationality were included in this study, and incomplete questionnaires and guest students were excluded from this study.

Instruments and data collection

The Persian versions of a series of questionnaires were self-administered in this study using an online platform. They were designed electronically by the Sadra Rayaneh Novin Tabarestan Engineering Co. (http://form3.mazandums.ir). Questionnaires distributed via the cyberspace, including popular messaging apps, WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, and the Short Message Service (SMS) among interns and residents involved in therapeutic activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. The questionnaires were sent to the participants, individually or in group.

Sociodemographic Survey Form (SDSF)

The main items in the SDSF were about age, gender, marital status, nativeness, internship and residency duration, field of study and specialty, accommodation, place of living, history of psychiatric disorders, smoking, and use of psychotropic drugs, as well as working at COVID-19 wards in months.

Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)

The CD-RISC was developed in 2003 to measure resilience on a five-point Likert-type scale. The minimum and maximum scores in the CD-RISC could be 0 and 100. The scale composed of five components, including (i) personal competence, high standards, and tenacity; (ii) trust in one’s instincts, tolerance of negative affect, and strengthening effects of stress; (iii) positive acceptance of change and secure relationships; (iv) control; and (v) spiritual influences [29]. Connor and Davidson [30] had reported its Cronbach’s alpha coefficient as 0.89. Besides, the test–retest reliability coefficient of this questionnaire within a four-week interval had been equal to 0.87[30]. As well, Ahangarzadeh and Rasoli [31] had investigated the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the CD-RISC. The internal consistency had been found to be α = 0.82. As well, such values were equal to 0.75, 0.72, 0.74, 0.73, and 0.75 for the sub-scales of (i) personal competence, high standards, and tenacity; (ii) trust in one’s instincts, tolerance of negative affect, and strengthening effects of stress; (iii) positive acceptance of change and secure relationships; (iv) control; and (v) spiritual influences respectively. Furthermore, the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between the two test administration was calculated as 0.404 (p < 0.05) [31].

Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE)

JSE for medical students

This scale consisted of 20 items and three sub-scales to measure empathy to patients in medical students, including (i) perspective taking (10 items), compassionate care (8 items), and walking in patient’s shoes (2 items). This scale also had 10 negative items that could be scored in reverse. As a whole, the scores of the items in each component could be added to obtain their total score at the acceptable range of 20–140. The psychometric properties of this scale had been already confirmed by Karimi et al. [32] Its face validity was also established through a qualitative method. The content validity of given scale was higher than 0.79, and it had relatively good internal consistency with the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.63. In this line, α = 0.71 had been similarly reported in Rafati et al. [33].

JSE for healthcare professionals

The scale contained 20 items under a five-point Likert-type scale. The total score could be at the range of 140–100. The minimum Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.7 was also considered for the reliability of this scale. This scale had further reached appropriate validity and reliability to measure empathy to patients in the Persian-speaking community, and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient had been reported as 0.83 [32, 34].

Toronto alexithymia scale-20 (TAS-20)

The TAS-20 comprised 20 items under three sub-scales of (i) difficulty in identifying feelings, (ii) difficulty in describing feelings, and (iii) externally oriented thinking on a five-point Likert-type scale. Examining the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the TAS-20, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for total alexithymia was 85%, and this value for the sub-scales of (i) difficulty in identifying emotions, (ii) difficulty in describing emotions, and (iii) externally oriented thinking was 82%, 75%, and 72%, respectively [34, 35].

Statistical analysis

The data were elicited from the online questionnaires in the form of a Microsoft Excel file, and then imported into the IBM SPSS Statistics (ver.26) software. Afterward, the descriptive statistics and the dispersion indices for the quantitative variables as well as frequency, percentage, and prevalence rate for the qualitative oneswere employed. Pearson correlation test and regression analysis were operated to address the research hypotheses. All data analysis processes were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics (ver.25) software with reference to the p < 0.05 significance level.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of participants

In total, 394 interns and residents were investigated. Table 1 illustrates the sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants.

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants
Full size table

The information about the participants’ educational attainment and place of study is given in Table 2.

Table 2 Characteristics of participants in terms of educational attainment and place of study
Full size table

Alexithymia, empathy, and resilience scores

According to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test outcomes, the data had a normal distribution, so parametric equations were utilized for calculation purposes. Table 3 displays the scores of alexithymia, empathy, and resilience. The mean score of empathy was thus 89.90 ± 14.00. Of note, the minimum and maximum scores of empathy was zero and 140, respectively. Besides, the resilience mean score was 46.40 ± 16.40, (the minimum score was 0 and the maximum value was 100). Furthermore, the mean value of alexithymia was 49.75 ± 10.56, out of the minimum and maximum scores of 20 and 100, respectively.

Table 3 Mean and median scores of alexithymia, empathy, and resilience
Full size table

Alexithymia, empathy, and resilience sub-scales

Table 4 shows the scores of the sub-scales of alexithymia, empathy, and resilience. Among the sub-scales of alexithymia, externally oriented thinking obtained the highest mean value (19.55 ± 3.45). With regard to the sub-scales of empathy, perspective taking had the mean score of 51.76 ± 9.44, compassionate care acquired the mean value of 30.48 ± 10.82, and walking in patient’s shoes received the mean score of 7.65 ± 3.26 in the study samples.

Table 4 Mean and median scores of sub-scales of alexithymia, empathy, and resilience
Full size table

Relationship between alexithymia, empathy, and resilience and sociodemographic characteristics

Table 5 provides the relationship between alexithymia, empathy, and resilience and sociodemographic characteristics. In view of that, no significant relationship was found between alexithymia and educational attainment (p = 0.117). However, there was a significant relationship between empathy and resilience and educational attainment (p = 0.000 and p = 0.000, respectively). Accordingly, the intensity of resilience and empathy in interns was significantly higher than that in residents. A significant relationship was further spotted between resilience and empathy and gender (p = 0.000 and p = 0.007, respectively), as the intensity of resilience and empathy in men was higher than that in women. Nevertheless, there was no significant relationship between alexithymia and gender (p = 0.957). Moreover, a significant relationship was found between alexithymia, resilience, and empathy and age (p = 0.002, p = 0.006, and p = 0.013, respectively), so the intensity of alexithymia, resilience, and empathy among those aged 20–30 was significantly higher than that in the participants over 30. A significant relationship was also detected between resilience and nativeness (p = 0.027). The intensity of resilience in non-native participants was significantly higher than that in the native ones (p = 0.027). There was no significant relationship between alexithymia and empathy and nativeness (p = 0.181 and p = 0.514, respectively). The intensity of alexithymia in the individuals with a history of smoking was significantly higher than that in people without such a history (p = 0.021).

Table 5 Relationship between alexithymia, empathy, and resilience and sociodemographic characteristics
Full size table

The relationship between alexithymia, empathy, and resilience and a history of substance use, years of practice, therapeutic activities at COVID-19 wards, and a history of psychiatric disorders as self-reported is listed in Table 6. A significant relationship was further found between alexithymia and resilience and a history of psychiatric disorders (p = 0.003 & p = 0.000, respectively), so the participants with a history of psychiatric problems had higher levels of alexithymia and lower resilience. Nevertheless, there was no significant relationship between empathy and a history of psychiatric disorders (p = 0.087).

Table 6 Relationship between alexithymia, empathy, and resilience and history of substance use
Full size table

Discussion

This study was to investigate alexithymia, empathy, and resilience in medical interns and residents in northern Iran during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Alexithymia

In this study, alexithymia was found to be moderate, which could augment the risk of mental disorders, especially in younger (30 years >) participants who acquired higher scores. Although gender was potentially an important risk factor in this respect, the present study did not demonstrate a significant difference in the prevalence rate of alexithymia between the male and female participants. These results were consistent with at least one previous study [35], even though the relevant research had identified gender as a significant risk factor [32, 34, 36, 37]. There were also conflicting results regarding gender-related differences for alexithymia across the related studies. In fact, some gender-specific differences had been reported in the general populations in Germany and Jordan [36, 38]. However, other studies in France or China had suggested that alexithymia could not be affected by gender [39, 40].

As well, smoking was introduced as a risk factor for alexithymia, which was in agreement with previous research reflecting a significant relationship in this respect [37, 41]. Some medical students might mistakenly resort to smoking as a stress-coping strategy [42]. They are thus more prone to higher levels of alexithymia. The cases with a history of psychiatric disorders or childhood abuse are also vulnerable to mental illnesses and suicidal behaviors. In this regard, the present study revealed that alexithymia was related to a history of psychiatric disorders. These individuals were not likely to share their problems with others due to alexithymia. In practical terms, those with alexithymia could have difficulty in expressing their emotions, which might result in substance use, major depression, and other psychiatric disorders [36, 43].

Lee et al. [44] demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic had negative consequences for mental health. However, it is unclear how and to what extent the psychological outcomes of this stressful event are moderated by individual characteristics. Given that alexithymia is a risk factor for psychopathology, and thus likely predicted individual differences in resilience or vulnerability to stressful events during the pandemic. They explored the moderating role of alexithymia in the relationships of pandemic-related stress with anxiety levels and attentional bias. Their participants were 103 Taiwanese individuals who completed a survey during the outbreak of the Omicron wave. Additionally, an emotional Stroop task including pandemic-related or neutral stimuli was used to measure attentional bias. Their results demonstrate that pandemic-related stress had a lesser impact on anxiety in individuals with a higher level of alexithymia. Moreover, they found that in individuals with higher exposure to pandemic-related stressors, a higher level of alexithymia indicated less attentional bias toward COVID-19-related information. Thus, it is plausible that individuals with alexithymia tended to avoid pandemic-related information, which could temporarily relieve stressors during the pandemic [44].

Physicians suffering from alexithymia may not be accordingly able to understand the emotional difficulties of themselves and their patients, and this affects therapeutic alliance and treatments. Therefore, alexithymia should be addressed while medical students are still studying; otherwise, those who graduate with alexithymia are likely to have difficulty in managing their emotions, thereby potentially endangering patients.

Empathy

According to the JSE, the mean score of empathy in this study was 89.90±14.00. Elyasi et al. [45], investigating the relationship between attachment styles and empathy among medical interns and residents at MAZUMS, reported this value as 99.9±44, which was in line with the scores obtained by French medical students and physicians [12, 45]. However, the mean score of empathy in Iranian physicians had been reported to be 111 in Shariat et al.’s study (2010) in a sample of Iranian physicians [46]. As evidenced in Wen [47], the mean value of empathy had been 109.6 among Chinese medical students [47]. The scores of empathy in different countries are given in Table 7 [47, 48].

Table 7 Comparison of empathy M ± SD in different countries
Full size table

The empathy mean score in the same population at MAZUMS, had been 10 points higher than that in the present study, which can be attributed to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic [45] or low motivation and hope in medical students in recent years and their tendency to migrate [49]. In their multicenter cross-sectional study on the tendency to migrate among medical residents (n=254) in Iran, Soltanizadeh et al. had found that 81.5% of the participants were willing to immigrate, while 79.5% of the cases had stated that they would prefer to migrate but not enroll in residency if they had their current insights into residency programs at the time of enrollment. This indicated that medical residency programs had significantly influenced the tendency to migrate among residents in Iran. However, most participants had no plans to do so. The bulk of the students also believed that the best time to migrate was after obtaining a degree in general medicine. The main reasons for their tendency to migrate were disproportionate income as compared to the working hours and daily living expenses, better welfare in destination countries, and unequal pays and employment laws in the Iranian healthcare system [49]. Examining job burnout in healthcare professional during the first peak of COVID-19 on 7626 individuals across Iran, Kamali et al. [50] had further disclosed that 57.8% of the cases were nurses and 14.4% of the participants were physicians. As well, 44.8% of these individuals were working at COVID-19 wards. As a whole, job burnout had been seen in 18.3% of the samples [50]. In 2020, in times of COVID-19, Azizi et al. [51] in their web-based study with an online questionnaire had correspondingly evaluated mental health among healthcare professionals in Iran. They had found that 47.9% and 70.5% of these individuals had experienced the physical and psychological symptoms of anxiety respectively, and 44.8% of the participants had reported depression according to the Corona Disease Anxiety Scale (CDAS). The results indicated that anxiety among healthcare workers was significantly correlated with age (p < 0.001), gender (p < 0.001), having a children (p < 0.001), educational level (p < 0.001), occupation (p = 0.016), working units (COVID-19 isolated units) (p < 0.001), and the history of psychological problems (p < 0.001). The results also showed that anxiety is significantly correlated with gender (p < 0.001) [51].

Therefore, anxiety, depression, and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic could have an effect on empathy. In this way, the present study showed that the increase in academic years of residency had made them suffer from job burnout, which was in agreement with previous research [50, 51]. It was concluded that with the increase of work pressures and daily life activities, residents are subjected to job burnout.

Whether empathy is influenced by gender or not is here and now debated. Male participants had more empathy scores in the present. In this regard, higher empathy had been reported in Portuguese and American female undergraduates [52, 53], but the male residents in North America and Brazil had demonstrated higher levels of empathy than their female counterparts [54, 55]. Elyasi et al. [45], investigating medical students at MAZUMS, had found no significant relationship between the empathy to patients and gender (p=0.305, CI 95% [−1.700 to 5.409]) [45].

As concluded in the recent study, the mean score of empathy in interns had been higher than that of residents (92.4 vs. 86.9). In other words, a significant relationship had been observed between empathy and educational attainment (p=0.000). However, Elyasi et al. [45] had found no significant difference between empathy in interns and residents at MAZUMS [45]. The main reason behind this discrepancy was the profound impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on residents as compared to interns due to their greater exposure to this crisis and the livelihood problems faced by this group, of whom a higher percentage had been married. Moreover, Bangash et al. [46] had shown no significant difference in the levels of empathy between the first- and last-year medical students in Pakistan [56]. Other studies on American medical students [57] and dental students [58] as well as Chinese students [47] had further detected no significant relationship between empathy and academic years. In spite of this, some had established that empathy had increased with spending more academic years at the schools of medicine [59]. Given that empathy is a fixed personality trait that develops from childhood [46, 57, 60], it is not expected that it diminishes easily during medical school education. The present study was a cross-sectional but not a longitudinal one; therefore, it could not examine the changes in empathy over time. On the other hand, teaching empathy or communication skills is not part of the curriculum of medical students in Iran, rather it is a hidden curriculum.  

Resilience

According to CD-RISC, the mean score of resilience in this study was 46.40±16.40, which is higher than the general population of China, South Korea, and the United States [30, 61, 62]. In contrast, it was similar to that measured among Australian nurses or Brazilian athletes who were living under stressful conditions on a daily basis [63, 64] as well as in earthquake survivors in China and Turkey [65, 66]. The results of the present study confirmed that the intensity of resilience in the male participants was significantly higher than that in their female counterparts, which was consistent with previous research [35]. In sum, empathy was higher in younger and native participants and among who had more educational attainment in this study.

Strengths and limitations

Investigating medical interns and residents at two universities was one of the main strengths of this study. A cross-sectional research design was also used, but the causal relationship could not be established, as it failed to observe the time-related changes in empathy and alexithymia. The data collection using a small sample size was one of the main limitations. In addition, the interns showed more willingness to cooperate than the residents in this study. The cooperation of female participants was also more than that of males.

Suggestions

It is suggested to conduct qualitative studies on empathy in natural and real-life settings using video recordings. The other idea is to design longitudinal studies to follow up the participants during their courses at the schools of medicine and examine the variations in alexithymia, empathy, and resilience over time. It is also better to conduct phenomenological studies on the experiences of physicians and medical students and reflect on the meanings of empathy in patient care. As this study was of self-report type, further investigations with observational designs are recommended. The study findings were further obtained from the participants working at two universities of medical sciences, so their generalizability was limited. To obtain more accurate data, it is necessary to carry out more extensive research across Iran on a larger sample size. Prospective studies should be additionally developed to investigate the relationship between alexithymia, empathy, and resilience as well as their changes at different levels among medical students and physicians and explain the long-term effects of empathy and patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and medical errors. It is a good idea to check alexithymia, empathy, and resilience among other healthcare professionals, e.g., nurses.

Conclusion

Low empathy and resilience in medical interns and residents, especially in women who make up the majority of them, can be a warning for health care in Iran.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets generated and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable requests.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

SDSF:

Sociodemographic survey form

JSE:

The Jefferson Scale of Empathy

TAS-20:

The Toronto Alexithymia Scale

CD-RISC:

The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale

References

  1. Hammoudi Halat D, Soltani A, Dalli R, Alsarraj L, Malki A. Understanding and fostering mental health and well-being among university faculty: a narrative review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(13):4425.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Amini E, Seif MH, Rastegar A. Factors affecting students’ academic resilience at Bushehr University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ. 2017;17:343–53.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rutter M. Annual research review: resilience – clinical implications. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54(4):474–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Houpy JC, Lee WW, Woodruff JN, Pincavage AT. Medical student resilience and stressful clinical events during clinical training. Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1320187.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cyrulnik B. Resilience: How your inner strength can set you free from the past. London: Penguin Books Limited; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Judkins S, Arris L, Keener E. Program evaluation in graduate nursing education: hardiness as a predictor of success among nursing administration students. J Prof Nurs. 2005;21(5):314–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coulter TJ, Mallett CJ, Gucciardi DF. Understanding mental toughness in Australian soccer: perceptions of players, parents, and coaches. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(7):699–716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin A, Marsh H. Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: a construct validity approach. Psychol Sch. 2006;43:267–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moffat KJ, McConnachie A, Ross S, Morrison JM. First year medical student stress and coping in a problem-based learning medical curriculum. Med Educ. 2004;38(5):482–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Darwin C, Prodger P. The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Oxford University Press; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Nemiah JC, Freyberger H, Sifneos PE. Alexithymia: a view of the psychosomatic process. In: Hill QW, editors. Modern trends in psychosomatic medicine, Vol. 3. London: Butterworths; 1976. p. 430–39.

  12. Morice-Ramat A, Goronflot L, Guihard G. Are alexithymia and empathy predicting factors of the resilience of medical residents in France? Int J Med Educ. 2018;9:122–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bagby RM, Parker JDA, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item toronto alexithymia scale—I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994;38(1):23–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rufer M, Ziegler A, Alsleben H, Fricke S, Ortmann J, Brückner E, et al. A prospective long-term follow-up study of alexithymia in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Compr Psychiatry. 2006;47(5):394–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Picardi A, Toni A, Caroppo E. Stability of alexithymia and its relationships with the ‘big five’ factors, temperament, character, and attachment style. Psychother Psychosom. 2005;74(6):371–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bressi C, Fronza S, Minacapelli E, Nocito EP, Dipasquale E, Magri L, et al. Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy with mentalization-based techniques in major depressive disorder patients: relationship among alexithymia, reflective functioning, and outcome variables – a pilot study. Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract. 2017;90(3):299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cravello L, Caltagirone C, Spalletta G. The SNRI venlafaxine improves emotional unawareness in patients with post-stroke depression. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp. 2009;24(4):331–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Parker JDA, Keefer KV, Taylor GJ, Bagby RM. Latent structure of the alexithymia construct: a taxometric investigation. Psychol Assess. 2008;20(4):385–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei H, Zhang L, Zhou X, Wang Y, Ren Z, Lin H, et al. A study of correlation between alexithymia and resilience in military personnel. Chin J Behav Med Brain Sci. 2011;12:1134–6. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2011.12.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fasihi R, Hasanzadeh R, Mahmoudi G. Attachment style and alexithymia correlation among university students. J Humanit Insights. 2019;3(02):45–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Decety J. Empathy in medicine: what it is, and how much we really need it. Am J Med. 2020;133(5):561–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thirioux B, Harika-Germaneau G, Langbour N, Jaafari N. The relation between empathy and insight in psychiatric disorders: phenomenological, etiological, and neuro-functional mechanisms. Front Psych. 2020;10:966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Timmermans S. The engaged patient: The relevance of patient–physician communication for twenty-first-century health. J Health Soc Behav. 2020;61(3):259–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang X, Li L, Zhang Q, Le LH, Wu Y. Physician empathy in doctor-patient communication: a systematic review. Health Commun. 2024;39(5):1027–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Campos CFC, Olivo CR, Martins MDA, Tempski PZ. Physicians’ attention to patients’ communication cues can improve patient satisfaction with care and perception of physicians’ empathy. Clinics. 2024;79:100377.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith DD, Kellar J, Walters EL, Reibling ET, Phan T, Green SM. Does emergency physician empathy reduce thoughts of litigation? A randomised trial. Emerg Med J. 2016;33(8):548–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fauchon C, Faillenot I, Perrin AM, Borg C, Pichot V, Chouchou F, et al. Does an observer’s empathy influence my pain? Effect of perceived empathetic or unempathetic support on a pain test. Eur J Neurosci. 2017;46(10):2629–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Krahé C, Springer A, Weinman J, Fotopoulou A. The social modulation of pain: others as predictive signals of salience – a systematic review. Front Human Neurosci. 2013. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jahedi R, Derakhshani R. The relationship between empathy and altruism with resilience among soldiers. Mil Psychol. 2020;10(40):57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahangarzadeh RS, Rasoli M. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of. J Urmia Nursing Midwifery Faculty 2015;13(9):739–47.

  32. Hashempor M, Karami M. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of JSPE-HP questionnaire (Jefferson scale of physician empathy-health professionals version). J Kerman Univ Med Sci. 2012;19(2):201–11.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rafati S, Rejeh N, Davati A, Foroutani F. Empathic attitudes in medical students: using of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy. Med Ethics J. 2016;10(36):25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Besharat MA. Reliability and factorial validity of a Farsi version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale with a sample of Iranian students. Psychol Rep. 2007;101(1):209–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moriguchi Y, Maeda M, Igarashi T, Ishikawa T, Shoji M, Kubo C, et al. Age and gender effect on alexithymia in large, Japanese community and clinical samples: a cross-validation study of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). BioPsychoSoc Med. 2007;1(1):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hamaideh SH. Alexithymia among Jordanian university students: its prevalence and correlates with depression, anxiety, stress, and demographics. Perspect Psychiatr care. 2018;54(2):274–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhu Y, Luo T, Liu J, Qu B. Influencing factors of alexithymia in Chinese medical students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Franz M, Popp K, Schaefer R, Sitte W, Schneider C, Hardt J, et al. Alexithymia in the German general population. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2008;43:54–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Loas G, Corcos M, Stephan P, Pellet J, Bizouard P, Venisse JL, et al. Factorial structure of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: confirmatory factorial analyses in nonclinical and clinical samples. J Psychosom Res. 2001;50(5):255–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ling Y, Zeng Y, Yuan H, Zhong M. Cross-cultural validation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in Chinese adolescents. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016;23(3–4):179–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Messedi N, Feki I, Saguem B, Masmoudi R, Masmoudi J. Alexithymia and coping strategies among medical students. Eur Psychiatry. 2017;41:S695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Saravanan C, Attlee A, Sulaiman N. A cross sectional study on knowledge, beliefs and psychosocial predictors of shisha smoking among university students in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev APJCP. 2019;20(3):903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dubey A, Pandey R. Mental health problems in alexithymia: role of positive and negative emotional experiences. J Proj Psychol Ment Health. 2013;20(2):128–36.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lee S-H, Lee K-T. The impact of pandemic-related stress on attentional bias and anxiety in alexithymia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):6327.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Elyasi F, Parkoohi PI, Hosseinnejad S, Azizi M, Kamali M. Relationship between secure and insecure attachment style with physician empathy among medical students: a cross-sectional study in Iran. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2022;16(2):e118529. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.118529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shariat SV, Habibi M. Empathy in Iranian medical students: measurement model of the Jefferson scale of empathy. Med Teach. 2013;35(1):e913–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wen D, Ma X, Li H, Liu Z, Xian B, Liu Y. Empathy in Chinese medical students: psychometric characteristics and differences by gender and year of medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hojat M, Gonnella JS. Eleven years of data on the Jefferson scale of empathy-medical student version (JSE-S): proxy norm data and tentative cutoff scores. Med Princ Pract. 2015;24(4):344–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Okhovati M, Shafian S, Ilaghi M, Behjati Y, Karamoozian A, Rezazadeh H, et al. Residency training or migration: a multi-centric study exploring the inclination to migrate among medical residents in Iran. Rese Square Platform LLC. 2023. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3092579/v1.

  50. Kamali M, Azizi M, Moosazadeh M, Mehravaran H, Ghasemian R, Reskati MH, et al. Occupational burnout in Iranian health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22(1):365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Azizi M, Kamali M, Moosazadeh M, Aarabi M, Ghasemian R, Hasannezhad Reskati M, et al. Assessing mental health status among Iranian healthcare workers in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: a web-based cross-sectional study. Brain Behav. 2021;11(8):e2304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Duarte MIF, Raposo MLB, da Silva Farinha PJF, Branco MC. Measuring empathy in medical students, gender differences and level of medical education: an identification of a taxonomy of students. Investig Educ Méd. 2016;5(20):253–60.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, Veloski JJ, Erdmann JB, et al. Empathy in medical students as related to academic performance, clinical competence and gender. Med Educ. 2002;36(6):522–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Santos MA, Grosseman S, Morelli TC, Giuliano IC, Erdmann TR. Empathy differences by gender and specialty preference in medical students: a study in Brazil. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:149.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Moralle MR, Preston JS, Chen L, Berberian WS. An exploratory study of empathy in resident physicians at an urban medical center. Int J Caring Sci. 2016;9(2):526.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bangash AS, Ali NF, Shehzad AH, Haqqi S. Maintenance of empathy levels among first and final year medical students: a cross sectional study. F1000Research. 2013;2:157. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-157.v1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Hojat M, Shannon SC, DeSantis J, Speicher MR, Bragan L, Calabrese LH. Does empathy decline in the clinical phase of medical education? A nationwide, multi-institutional, cross-sectional study of students at DO-granting medical schools. Acad Med. 2020;95(6):911–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Naguib GH, Sindi AM, Attar MH, Alshouibi EN, Hamed MT. A cross-sectional study of empathy among dental students at King Abdulaziz University. J Dent Educ. 2020;84(1):22–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kötter T, Kiehn L, Obst KU, Voltmer E. The development of empathy and associated factors during medical education: a longitudinal study. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021;8:23821205211030176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Vergare M, Magee M. Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(9):1563–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Jung YE, Min JA, Shin AY, Han SY, Lee KU, Kim TS, et al. The Korean version of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale: an extended validation. Stress Health. 2012;28(4):319–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ni MY, Li TK, Yu NX, Pang H, Chan BH, Leung GM, et al. Normative data and psychometric properties of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) and the abbreviated version (CD-RISC2) among the general population in Hong Kong. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:111–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gillespie BM, Chaboyer W, Wallis M. The influence of personal characteristics on the resilience of operating room nurses: A predictor study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(7):968–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Belem IC, Caruzzo NM, Nascimento Junior JRAD, Vieira JLL, Vieira LF. Impact of coping strategies on resilience of elite beach volleyball athletes. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria Desempenho Humano. 2014;16:447–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Karaırmak Ö. Establishing the psychometric qualities of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in a trauma survivor sample. Psychiatry Res. 2010;179(3):350–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Yu X-N, Lau JT, Mak WW, Zhang J, Lui WW. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale among Chinese adolescents. Compr Psychiatry. 2011;52(2):218–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article has been extracted from M.D. Thesis. (Yeganeh Amirsoleimani). The authors thank all the participants who co‐operated in this study.

Funding

The project was financially supported by the Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Center, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

    Forouzan Elyasi

  2. Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

    Yeganeh Amirsoleimani

  3. Social Determinants of Health Research Center., Faculty of Medicine., Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

    Romina Hamzehpour

  4. Gastrointestitional Cancer Research Center, Non-Communicable Disease Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

    Mahmood Moosazadeh

  5. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

    Mehran Zarghami

  6. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

    Mehran Zarghami

  7. Development Unit of Yahyanejad Hospital, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

    Maryam Vajdi

  8. Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

    Elham Motevalli Alamouti & Fatemeh Alizadeh Arimi

  9. Imam Khomeini General Hospital, Razi Ave., Sari, 48157-33971, Mazandaran, Iran

    Mahmood Moosazadeh

  10. Zare Hospital, Taravat Street, Neka Road, Sari, 4843185774, Mazandaran, Iran

    Mehran Zarghami

Authors
  1. Forouzan Elyasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yeganeh Amirsoleimani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Romina Hamzehpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mahmood Moosazadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mehran Zarghami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maryam Vajdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Elham Motevalli Alamouti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fatemeh Alizadeh Arimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

F. E.: contributed to the conception, drafting, language editing, and editing of the manuscript; Y.A.: did the literature search., and contributed to data gathering, statistical analyses and interpretation of data. M. Z.: contributed to the conception., language editing, and editing of the manuscript.,M.M. Contributed to the statistical analyses and interpretation of data; R.H., M.V., E.M.A., F.A.A.: contributed to data gathering.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mahmood Moosazadeh or Mehran Zarghami.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics Committee affiliated with Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences approved this report [Ethics Code: IR.MAZUMS.REC.1401.019]. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in this study.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the participants.

Competing interests

The authors declared no competing interests in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elyasi, F., Amirsoleimani, Y., Hamzehpour, R. et al. Investigating alexithymia, empathy, and resilience in medical students during pandemic era: a cross-sectional study in northern Iran. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 60, 119 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00887-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00887-9

Keywords