Skip to main content

Risk factors of cognitive impairment post-ischemic stroke

Abstract

Background

Stroke is still remarked as one of the major ailments in Indonesia. Cognitive impairment occurs frequently after stroke events and its predictors are needed to identify patients with a high risk of cognitive impairment. However, the researches done in Indonesia still vary in results. This retrospective cohort study evaluated 236 ischemic stroke patients in Bethesda Hospital Yogyakarta from January–November 2020 through medical records. Cognitive impairment was measured by MMSE and CDT, defined as MMSE score \(\le\) 20 for patients with the educational attainment of 1–6 years; \(\le\) 24 for the educational attainment of > 6 years and/ or CDT < 4. All data were analyzed with univariate test and Chi-square test, followed by logistic regression.

Results

Of 236 subjects, the frequency of cognitive impairment was 67.4% and the risk factors are age > 80 years old (RR: 1,545; CI 0.136–17.542; p: 0.026), educational attainment ≤ 6 years (RR: 20.016; CI 1.951–222.120; p: 0.012), temporal (RR: 4.238; CI 2.266–7.926; p: 0.007) or multiple site lesion location (RR: 7.522; CI: 3.522–17.532; p: 0.047) and multiple (> 1) lesions (RR: 1,819; CI 0.822–4.022; p: 0.040).

Conclusions

The prevalence of post-stroke cognitive impairment is high, affecting up to 2 out of 3 people in this study. The risk factors of post-stroke cognitive impairment are age > 80 years, educational attainment \(\le\) 6 years, temporal or multiple site lesion, and > 1 lesion. Strict stroke prevention strategies are needed to halt the development of post-stroke cognitive impairment.

Background

Other than its high mortality rate, post-stroke disability remains the world’s main problem. Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is the most frequent disability [1], experienced by up to 30% of stroke survivors worldwide [2]. A later prospective study shows 62.6% [3] individuals affected by PSCI, and the rate was predicted to be increasing annually as the population ages. PSCI is manifested by impaired cognitive domain functions such as decreased memory function, especially short-term memory, language use, executive function, impaired attention, initiating activities, and planning and organizing [4], causing limitations in individual daily activities and dependence on others. Many factors significantly increase the risk of post-stroke cognitive impairment [5]. Identification of its predictive factors can be used as a preventive measure for worsening cognitive impairment in individuals, in which delaying the onset of PSCI for 5 years can reduce the overall incidence of PSCI by 50% [6]. Studies conducted in Indonesia to identify risk factors for post-stroke cognitive impairment showed variable results. The combination of MMSE and CDT as diagnostic tools for post-stroke cognitive disorders has never been done. This study was aimed at identifying risk factors for cognitive impairment in post-ischemic stroke patients.

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzes medical records of ischemic stroke patients from the stroke registry at Bethesda Hospital Yogyakarta in the period January to November 2020 on 236 subjects. Any stroke patient above > 18 years old with complete medical records was included in this study and later screened for any exclusion criteria including any previous cognitive impairment, any disease which cognitively debilitating such as psychotic episodes of mental illnesses, and any disease which hinders communication such as aphasia of any types.

Cognitive impairment was measured 1 to 3 months after stroke onset using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) with a cut-off according to the Shanghai Mental Health Center and the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) using a 4-point scoring system. Cognitive impairment was defined as an MMSE with a score of 20 for a 1–6 year educational history; 24 for education history > 6 years and/or Clock Drawing Test score < 4. Any statistically significant variable will be further analyzed using multivariate logistic regression (Table 1).

Table 1 Multivariate logistic regression test result

Results

There were 236 subjects in this study with the highest number of subjects in the age group 50–60 years (33.5%), male gender (67.8%), with the majority of patients having education attainment more than 6 years old (89.8%), and without a history of previous stroke (83.5%). The most common risk factors for stroke were a history of dyslipidemia (59.3%), hypertension (53.4%), smoking habits (44.1%), and diabetes mellitus (25.8%). Most subjects had multiple lesion locations (47.9%) and lacunar lesions (49.6%). Details of the characteristics of the subject are in Table 2.

Table 2 Basic characteristics of subjects

The results of cognitive impairment measurement using MMSE and CDT are provided in Table 3, showing 67.4% of subjects are cognitively impaired, as defined by MMSE and CDT instrument cut-offs combined.

Table 3 Cognitive function test results

Based on the results of the bivariate test in Table 4, it was found that age, education attainment, lesion location, and the number of lesions (p < 0.05) had statistical significance and a significant relationship to the outcome of cognitive impairment in post-stroke patients.

Table 4 Chi-square test result

Discussion

Residual events post-stroke attack is a concern to not only the patient, but also their caregiver and physicians. The incidence of post-stroke cognitive impairment is high, in which 67.4% of subjects of this study were proven to be cognitively impaired, higher than the previous study [7, 8]. Differences in the incidence are due to the demographic differences between the research subjects and the research instruments used by each researcher. The purpose of analyzing cognitive impairment in the subacute phase of stroke in this study is although most functional recovery occurred within the first 6 months [9], it is worth noting that the impairment would inhibit subsequent recovery of motor functions and daily activities independence thus interfering with the outcome of rehabilitation [10]. The incidence of cognitive impairment across different time horizons also varies between < 50% to 90% [11]. Adjustments of instruments cut-offs are used for equalization, avoiding bias and subject’s perception misunderstanding regarding the questions on the assessment [12].

Demographic status and lesion characteristics on radiological imaging are associated with decreased cognitive function [13]. In this study, the highest incidence of cognitive impairment was shown in the > 80 years old age group, in accordance with previous studies [14]. Stroke increases the risk of cognitive impairment by 1.8 times compared to the elderly without stroke [15]. Cognitive function declines linearly with age due to changes in brain neurotransmitters, accumulation of oxidative stress, and changes in body biochemistry [16].

The length of education will increase the individual's cognitive reserve. Individuals with a high cognitive reserve can compensate for brain tissue damage more efficiently, thereby reducing the risk of cognitive impairment [17, 18]. Adherence to medication and lifestyle also affects the outcome of poor cognitive impairment in individuals with 6 years of education [19]. The results in this study are in accordance with the previous studies [8, 13].

Damage to brain tissue in certain locations determines the outcome of cognitive impairment [19]. The temporal location of the lesion increases the risk of post-stroke cognitive impairment related to the physiological function of that region [20], namely impaired episodic (long-term) memory function. The results of this study are in accordance with the previous studies [21]. Multiple lesions result in increasingly inadequate brain response to compensate for the progressive infarct damage [22]. The results of this study are the same as those of the previous studies [23].

Gender, history of the previous stroke, dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and smoking habits were not significant factors influencing the outcome of cognitive impairment as shown by previous studies [23]. Although controversial, the evaluation of smoking habits for cognitive impairment after stroke has a survival rate bias [24]. The relationship between gender and cognitive impairment after stroke has many biases including socioeconomic status, psychosocial status, sex hormones, and serum adiponectin [25,26,27], so that mentioned factors do not correlate significantly to the predictors of cognitive impairment after stroke.

This study is not without limitations. The results of this study could not analyze any progression of the cognitive impairment outside the study timeline (> 3 months). Moreover, the results cannot be used to predict the long-term prognosis of the disease. Due to this study design, the authors cannot guarantee error-free data collection as the data used are secondary data (medical records).

Conclusion

Stroke also poses many burden even after period of inpatient. Predictors of post-stroke cognitive impairment are age (> 80 years), education attainment (≤ 6 years), temporal or multiple lesion location, and multiple (> 1) brain lesions. Strict stroke prevention will be beneficial in reducing and preventing post-stroke cognitive impairment, especially in this aging population.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CDT:

Clock Drawing Test

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

HT:

Hypertension

MMSE:

Mini-Mental State Examination

PSCI:

Post-stroke cognitive impairment

References

  1. Sun JH, Tan L, Yu JT. Post-stroke cognitive impairment: epidemiology, mechanisms and management. Ann Transl Med. 2014. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.08.05.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rist PM, Chalmers J, Arima H, Anderson C, Macmahon S, Woodward M, et al. Baseline cognitive function, recurrent stroke, and risk of dementia in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2013;44(7):1790–5. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.680728.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu K-H, Cho S-J, Oh MS, Jung S, Lee J-H, Shin J-H, et al. Cognitive impairment evaluated with Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards in a multicenter prospective stroke cohort in Korea. Stroke. 2013;44(3):786–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.668343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Teasell R, Salter K, Faltynek P, Cotoi A, Eskes G. Chapter 12: cognitive rehabilitation. Evidence-Based Rev Stroke Rehabil. 2019;2000.

  5. Lo JW, Crawford JD, Desmond DW, Godefroy O, Jokinen H, Mahinrad S, et al. Profile of and risk factors for poststroke cognitive impairment in diverse ethnoregional groups. Neurology. 2019;93(24):e2257–71. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008612.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kemenkes RI. Panduan Praktik Klinis Bagi Dokter di Fasilitas Pelayanan Primer Edisi II. Mentri Kesehat Republik Indones. 2014;150.

  7. Nahrowi NS, Ong PA, Adam A. Cognitive and functional outcome of patients with ischemic stroke at Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital Bandung. Althea Med J. 2018;5(2):82–6. https://doi.org/10.15850/amj.v5n2.1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saphira Nurani RR, Martini S. Risk factors for cognitive impairment after ischemic stroke. KnE Life Sci. 2018;4(9):87. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4i9.3560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee KB, Lim SH, Kim KH, Kim KJ, Kim YR, Chang WN, et al. Six-month functional recovery of stroke patients: a multi-time-point study. Int J Rehabil Res Int Zeitschrift fur Rehabil Rev Int Rech Readapt. 2015;38(2):173–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mori N, Otaka Y, Honaga K, Matsuura D, Kondo K, Liu M, et al. Factors associated with cognitive improvement in subacute stroke survivors. J Rehabil Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2859.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gottesman RF, Hillis AE. Predictors and assessment of cognitive dysfunction resulting from ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(9):895–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70164-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kochhann R, Varela JS, de Lisboa CSM, Chaves MLF. The mini mental state examination: review of cutoff points adjusted for schooling in a large Southern Brazilian sample. Dement Neuropsychol. 2010;4(1):35–41. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-57642010dn40100006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Boletimi RO, Kembuan MAHN, Pertiwi JM. Gambaran Fungsi Kognitif Pasien Pasca Stroke. Med Scope J. 2021;2(2):66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ji Y, Shi Z, Zhang Y, Liu S, Liu S, Yue W, et al. Prevalence of dementia and main subtypes in rural northern China. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2015;39(5–6):294–302. https://doi.org/10.1159/000375366.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Srithum W, Kabayama M, Gondo Y, Masui Y, Akagi Y, Klinpudtan N, et al. Association between stroke and cognitive decline in community dwelling older and oldest people: The SONIC Study. 2019;1–23. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.15994/v1

  16. Scullin MK, Bliwise DL. Sleep, cognition, and normal aging: integrating a half century of multidisciplinary research. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(1):97–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614556680.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Steffener J, Stern Y. Exploring the neural basis of cognitive reserve in aging. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822(3):467–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.09.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cosentino S, Stern Y. Handbook on the neuropsychology of aging and dementia. 2013;

  19. Ovcar K, Potocnik J, Rakusa M. Vascular cognitive impairment and vascular dementia. J Neurol Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-510X(02)00255-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yueniwati Y, Press UB, Media UB, KSP T, Indra R. Deteksi Dini Stroke Iskemia: dengan Pemeriksaan Ultrasonografi Vaskular dan Variasi Genetika [Internet]. Universitas Brawijaya Press; 2015https://books.google.co.id/books?id=tUJRDwAAQBAJ

  21. Tumiwa F, Pinzon RT, Adisaputro S. Hubungan Hipertensi Dengan Gangguan Fungsi Kognitif Pada Pasien Post-Stroke Iskemik Di Rs Bethesda Association Between Hypertension With Cognitive Impairment On Post-Stroke Ischemic Patient In Bethesda Hospital. J Keokteran Yars. 2017;25(3):135–44.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Danovska M, Peychinska D. Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment – Phenomenology and Prognostic Factors. J IMAB. 2012;2012(18):290–7. https://doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2012183.290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pinzon RT, Sanyasi RDL, Totting S. The prevalence and determinant factors of post-stroke cognitive impairment. Asian Pacific J Heal Sci. 2018;5(1):78–83. https://doi.org/10.21276/apjhs.2018.5.1.17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Momtaz YA, Ibrahim R, Hamid TA, Chai ST. Smoking and cognitive impairment among older persons in Malaysia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015;30(4):405–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317514552318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kalaria RN, Akinyemi R, Ihara M. Stroke injury, cognitive impairment and vascular dementia. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1862(5):915–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.01.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cho J, Jin Y, Lee I, Hong H, Kim D, Park S, et al. Physical inactivity and cognitive impairment in Korean older adults: gender differences in potential covariates. Ann Hum Biol. 2017;44(8):729–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2017.1392604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gannon OJ, Robison LS, Custozzo AJ, Zuloaga KL. Sex differences in risk factors for vascular contributions to cognitive impairment & dementia. Neurochem Int. 2019;127:38–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2018.11.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no funding from any funding agency in the public or commercial sector.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RTP conceived the study. RTP, NPU participated in its design and coordination, and helped to draft the manuscript. RTP retrieved the data. NPU reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rizaldy Taslim Pinzon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This observational study was approved by the ethics committee of the Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine Duta Wacana Christian University, and Bethesda Hospital Research Ethic Committee. The committee’s reference number is 19/KEPK-RSB/II/21. All participants provided verbal informed consent to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Utomo, N.P., Pinzon, R.T. Risk factors of cognitive impairment post-ischemic stroke. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 59, 55 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-023-00654-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-023-00654-2

Keywords