Skip to main content
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
Download PDF

Neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus in a cohort of Egyptian patients

The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery volume 58, Article number: 32 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) is a severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that is characterized by a variety of neurological manifestations involving both central and peripheral nervous system with variable mechanisms. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of NPSLE and its relation to other clinical and laboratory findings in SLE patients.

Results

We retrieved the medical records of 134 SLE patients during the study period; of them, 68 patients (50.7%) had NPSLE. Headache (55. 9%) was the most frequent NPSLE manifestation followed by seizures (54.4%), psychosis was the third most frequent one with a percentage of 41.2. The demographic data didn’t differ in patients with and without NPSLE. NPSLE patients had lower complement 3 (C3) (p = 0.025) and C4 (p = 0.008) levels, more lupus anticoagulant level (p = 0.033) and more frequency of antiphospholipid syndrome (p = 0.030). There was no statistical difference regarding the drug intake or other laboratory findings. Disease activity and damage indices didn’t differ in both groups.

Conclusion

The prevalence of NPSLE in this study was 50.7%. Headache, seizures and psychosis were the most frequent neuropsychiatric manifestations in the studied patients. SLE patients with neuropsychiatric manifestations had lower complement levels, higher lupus anticoagulant antibodies and antiphospholipid syndrome.

Background

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease with multi organ affection. One of the most severe manifestations in SLE is neuropsychiatric involvement, which is commonly associated with a poor prognosis [1]. In fact, neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematous (NPSLE) is a leading cause of morbidity in SLE patients, with mortality rate second only to lupus nephritis [2].

The prevalence of NPSLE ranges from 12.2 to 94.7% for SLE patients. This wide range is likely due to different study designs regarding follow-up duration and methods of screening. Also, the high variability of NPSLE presentations, the lack of specificity of many symptoms (such as headache and mild cognitive impairment) as well as difficulties in attributing NPSLE manifestations to SLE or non SLE pathologies making it difficult to estimate the precise incidence of NPSLE [3,4,5]).

The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1999 has identified 19 neuropsychiatric syndromes that can be categorized into central and peripheral nervous systems manifestations. Despite the fact that this definition involves signs with undefined physiological and pathological mechanisms, it assists physicians in determining neurological involvement in SLE [6]. In 2014, some authors developed and validated a new algorithm based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) definitions that involves evaluating the patient’s lupus behavior, imaging techniques, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis to identify true NPSLE [7].

Two different pathophysiologic pathways are postulated to contribute to NPSLE: the inflammatory, related to a pro-inflammatory and/or autoimmune-mediated cause and the thrombotic/ischemic pathway, associated with vascular occlusion, hemorrhage and microangiopathy. Both ischemic and inflammatory NPSLE have been included in the term primary NPSLE. Moreover, secondary NPSLE refers to SLE patients with symptoms linked to the medication for SLE or to SLE-related organ damage [2, 8,9,10,11,12].

Although autoantibodies are one of the most powerful tools for the diagnosis of NPSLE, not all of them are characterized by high specificity and sensitivity for the NPSLE. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) or anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies can be found in every patient with SLE and not only in those with NPSLE. The frequency of other antibodies in NPSLE, such as anti-SSA/Ro, anti-SSB/La, anti-Sm or anti-nuclear ribonucleoprotein, varies widely among the different studies. Lupus anticoagulant is a group of autoantibodies frequently found among patients with NPSLE, that usually associated with focal symptoms. Anti-aquaporin 4 antibodies cause astrocyte toxicity, mainly in the white matter structures of the spinal cord and optic nerve, so they are thought to underlie the pathogenesis of neuromyelitis optica [13].

Since there have been few systematic studies of NPSLE in Egypt, in this retrospective study we aimed at describing the various neuropsychiatric manifestations in a cohort of Egyptian patients and its relation to different demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics.

Methods

Aim, study design and patients

This study aimed to investigate the frequency of NPSLE and its relation to other clinical and laboratory parameters in SLE patients.

In this retrospective study, the medical records of SLE patients who sought medical advice at the Neuropsychiatry and Rheumatology departments—from July 2018 to March 2021—were revised. All patients fulfilled the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria [14]. NPSLE were diagnosed according to the ACR 1999 categories [6]. Patients with Diabetes mellitus or any primary neurological disease that was diagnosed before SLE diagnosis were excluded.

Data collection

The following data was retrieved from the records of all patients: demographics characteristics including age, age of onset and disease duration, detailed medical history about different manifestations of neuropsychiatric lupus and different drug therapy, general medical examination and thorough neurological examination. SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) [15] and SLICC Damage Index score [16] were calculated for all patients. Laboratory investigations including: Complete blood picture and immunological profile: Complement 3 (C3), Complement 4 (C4), ANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-cardiolipin, Lupus Anticoagulant, anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 (anti β 2 GP 1) and Anti-Smith antibodies, were all reported. We divided our cohort of patients into two groups, Group 1 including NPSLE (patients with one or more neuropsychiatric manifestations) and Group 2 including non-NPSLE.

Statistical analysis

Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov was used to verify the normality of distribution of variables, Comparisons between groups for categorical variables were assessed using Chi-square test (Fisher or Monte Carlo). Student t test was used to compare two groups for normally distributed quantitative variables. Significance of the obtained results was judged at the 5% level.

Results

Characteristics of the study population

As shown in Table 1, this study included 134 patients with SLE. 68 patients (50.75%) had one or NPSLE manifestations. The mean age of the NPSLE group was 27.4 ± 7.7, while it was 28.2 ± 8.9 years in the non-NPSLE group. In the NPSLE group, the frequency of males and females was 7.4% (n = 5) and 92.6% (n = 63), respectively. The mean age of onset was 21.3 ± 7.4. The mean duration of the disease was 6 ± 3.8 years.

Table 1 Comparison between the studied groups according to demographic data
Full size table

Characteristics of patients with NPSLE

Headache (55.9%) was the most frequent NPSLE manifestation followed by seizures (54.4%), psychosis was the third most frequent one with a percentage of 41.2. The least common NP manifestation was chorea, Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (AIDP) and acute confusional state being present in one (1.5%), 2 (2.9%) and 3 (4.4%) patients, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2 Distribution of the studied patients according to NPSLE in group I patients (n = 68)
Full size table

Differences between both groups regarding laboratory and immunological results

As shown in Table 3, results of complete blood picture were compared between both groups with evaluation of different laboratory abnormalities found in patients of SLE as anemia, leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia and there was no significant difference between both groups. However, regarding immunological profile, NPSLE patients had lower C3 and C4 levels and more lupus anticoagulant level.

Table 3 Comparison between the studied groups according to laboratory results
Full size table

Impact on disease activity and damage indices, association with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and drug intake

As illustrated in Tables 4 and 5, there was no signification difference of SLICC damage index or SLEDAI between NPSLE group and non NPSLE group. Antiphospholipid syndrome has higher association with NPSLE as compared to non NPSLE patients (25%, 10.6%, respectively) (p > 0.03), as shown in Table 4. No difference in the drug intake in both groups.

Table 4 Comparison between the studied groups according to SLICC damage index, SLEDAI and antiphospholipid syndrome
Full size table
Table 5 Comparison between the studied groups according to drugs
Full size table

Discussion

The present study, using the ACR definitions, detected the presence of 10 of the 19 syndromes: 7 central and 3 peripheral nervous system syndromes. The NPSLE was present in 50.75% of the studied patients. Previous study conducted on 770 Egyptian patients showed that NPSLE was present in 44.3% [17]. The prevalence of NPSLE ranges from 12.2 to 94.7% for SLE patients [3, 4] which is obviously a wide range due to the high variability of NPSLE presentations, the lack of specificity of many symptoms (such as headache and mild cognitive impairment) as well as difficulties in attributing NPSLE manifestations to SLE or non SLE pathologies. The most common clinical manifestations in the current study were headache which reported in 38/68 patients, followed by seizures (37/68) and psychosis (28/68). Similar to this study, headache has previously been reported as the most prevalent manifestations of NPSLE [18, 19]. Also, previous studies showed that seizures [20, 21] and psychosis [20] were among the most common presentations. On the other hand, CVA [12, 22] and cognitive impairment [23] were the most NPSLE manifestations in other previous studies.

In this study, headache was the most prevalent neuropsychiatric manifestations, being present in 55.9% of SLE patients. The relation between SLE and headache is debatable. Some studies have discovered a higher, but highly variable, prevalence of headache in people with SLE (ranging from 24 to 72%) [24]. Others, including the results of a meta-analysis of several studies, also found no rise in the incidence of headache in SLE patients relative to control groups [25]. The discrepancies are due, in part, to the lack of uniform headache definition in several studies and the fact that headache is a common occurrence in the general population, especially among women. Just a few previous studies have found a connection between headache and other active lupus clinical features [26, 27]. Obviously, many confounding factors may be related to the headache whether related or not to SLE.

The results of this study showed that seizures occurred in 54.4% of patients. A recent Egyptian study reported that seizure was the most common presentation in NPSLE patients with a prevalence of 43.3% [28]. SLE patients have a higher risk of seizures than the general population, according to previous reports [29, 30]. Seizures were the most common NPSLE manifestation in SLICC study [31]. The definite cause of seizures in SLE is unknown but it might be due to systemic inflammation, focal microvascular brain trauma, direct autoantibody effects on neuronal networks, or a combination of these factors [32, 33].

Regarding psychosis, the prevalence of psychosis has been reported to range between 0 and 17.1% using the ACR case description for psychosis [34, 35]. The following criteria are included in the ACR case definition for psychosis [6]: (1) delusions or hallucinations without insight; (2) causing clinical distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other relevant areas of functioning; (3) disturbance should not occur exclusively during delirium; and (4) not better accounted for by another mental disorder. Episodes of psychosis that occurred during the enrollment window or reported previously by patients were recorded. In the current work, psychosis was reported in 41% of NPSLE patient group. Other recent studies report psychosis as a rare NSSLE event [36, 37]. Similar to this finding, another Egyptian study in 2020 reported psychosis as the most prevalent NPSLE [38]. This high prevalence among our patients as patients of African descent were also more likely to develop psychosis than other race/ethnicity [39]. In addition, the use of large dosages of steroids in patients with SLE is thought to cause psychological problems and the neuropsychiatric symptoms appear shortly after starting steroid treatment, making it difficult to distinguish from steroid psychosis [40]. Apart from psychosis, major depression is one of the most common psychiatric illnesses seen in individuals with SLE, with prevalence rates ranging from 16 to 60% (which is subsequently greater than the general population [41, 42]. Higher prevalence of major depression was found among Egyptian SLE (64%) which was related to disease activity, not to steroids or duration of illness [43]. Depression worsens fatigue, discomfort, and psychological distress in SLE patients, as well as lowering adherence to drugs, resulting in a considerable reduction in quality of life [44].

Focal NPSLE is a form of NPSLE that affects only one part of the brain and is caused by venous thrombosis or arterial ischemia. Similar to this study which reported cerebrovascular disorders in 22% of patients, the incidence of focal NPSLE cases are thought to account for about 20% of all cases [45, 46], but reported rates range from 3 to 43% in other studies [47, 48]. These are primarily caused by thromboembolic events that occur as a part of SLE-related hypercoagulable states and are strongly linked to the existence of antiphospholipid antibodies [49]

The average incidence of peripheral neuropathy (PN) in studied sample (23.5%) was higher than that reported by Oomatia et al. (5.9%) [50] and Hanly et al. (7.6%) [51] and that reported in the other two major cohort studies (14.7% and 17.7%) [52, 53]. Hanly and colleagues in the international inception cohort study classified all PNs as not attributable to SLE if there was no electrophysiologic confirmation [29, 51]. The ACR, on the other hand, recommends that the diagnosis be based on clinical findings and/or electrophysiological testing [6]. The justification of the high prevalence of PN is that PN in the current study was diagnosed according to ACR criteria for diagnosis and confirmed by electrophysiological study which might detect earlier cases before manifest clinical complaint. Also the process of attribution of neurologic events to SLE or not is not always an easy task. PN can also manifest as complications of other organ involvement in SLE (renal failure, liver failure), nutritional deficiency, or even as drug side effects (steroid-induced diabetes, antimalarial drugs, azathioprine) [52].

There were no differences between patients with and without NPSLE involvement according to the demographic data. NPSLE can occur at any time during the disease course and it can be even the first presentation. There is a limited evidence to support an association between demographic characteristics and NPSLE [54]. This is in contrast to a recent Egyptian study that found NPSLE patients were characterized by being younger with an earlier age of onset of lupus [38].

In the current work, a statistical significant difference of C3 (p = 0.025) and C4 (p = 0.008) levels, lupus anticoagulant level (p = 0.033) and antiphospholipid syndrome (p = 0.030), was found between the studied groups. This goes in accordance with Magro-Checa et al. [55] and partially with Medhat et al. [38] regarding antiphospholipid syndrome and other studies regarding complement levels [56, 57].

Complement activation is an important mechanism of tissue injury in neural tissue ischemia. Platelets bearing the complement-activation product C4d are a well-known link between cerebrovascular inflammation, thrombosis and NPSLE. An increase in deposition of complement-activation products on platelets is related to the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, and it has been postulated as an important mechanism in antiphospholipid mediated thrombosis in SLE [56,57,58]. A rise in complement-activation products in serum of antiphospholipid antibodies positive patients has been related with the development of NPSLE [58]. Antiphospholipid antibodies, anti-ribosomal-P antibodies, and anti-NMDA antibodies are all closely associated to the neuropsychiatric manifestation in SLE [59]. A relatively recent study discovered that brain exposure to antibodies is caused by aberrant blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB) function in the choroid plexus and significant intrathecal lymphocyte infiltration is likely to occur via the BCSFB, which is accompanied by epithelial hyperpermeability to antibodies [60].

In this study, there was no statistical difference regarding the drug intake or other laboratory findings. SLICC and SLEDAI didn’t differ in both groups. SLE, being a multisystem disease affecting almost all body systems can explain these findings. While the NPSLE manifestations can affect the disease activity and damage scores, many other systemic affection have also comparable effect on them. This is in contrast to previous studies [38, 58].

Being a retrospective study, some data needed more verification, which could be considered as the study’s main limitation. On the other hand, this study involved a large cohort from a tertiary center involving patients from two different specialty clinics and providing high variability of disease presentations.

Conclusion

The prevalence of Neuropsychiatric manifestations in this study was 50.7%. Headache, seizures and psychosis are the most frequent neuropsychiatric manifestations in the studied patients. SLE patients with neuropsychiatric manifestations have lower complement levels, higher lupus anticoagulant antibodies and antiphospholipid syndrome. SLE Patients with low complement levels and antiphospholipid syndrome should be regularly assessed for early diagnosis of NPSLE. Patients of SLE should have regular neuropsychiatric evaluation regardless the disease activity or damage scores.

Availability of data and materials

Available.

Abbreviations

ACR:

American College of Rheumatology

AIDP:

Acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

C3:

Complement 3

C4:

Complement 4

ANA:

Antinuclear antibody

Anti-dsDNA:

Anti-double strand DNA

Anti β 2 GP 1:

Anti-beta-2 glycoprotein 1 antibody

BCSFB:

Blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier

SLE:

Systemic lupus erythematosus

NPSLE:

Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus

SLICC:

Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics

SLEDAI:

SLE Disease Activity Index

References

  1. Ahn GY, Kim D, Won S, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and impact on mortality of neuropsychiatric lupus: a prospective, single-center study. Lupus. 2018;27(8):1338–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz N, Stock AD, Putterman C. Neuropsychiatric lupus: new mechanistic insights and future treatment directions. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15(3):137–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Unterman A, Nolte JES, Boaz M, Abady M, Shoenfeld Y, Zandman-Goddard G. Neuropsychiatric syndromes in systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011;41(1):1–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morad CS, Mansour HE, Ibrahim SE, et al. Subclinical neuropsychiatric dysfunctions in female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil. 2018;45:49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang PI, Cagnoli PC, McCune WJ, Schmidt-Wilcke T, Lowe SE, Graft CC, et al. Perfusion-weighted MR imaging in cerebral lupus erythematosus. Acad Radiol. 2012;19:965–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Liang MH, Corzillius M, Bae SC, Lew RA, Fortin PR, Gordon C, et al. The American College of Rheumatology nomenclature and case definitions for neuropsychiatric lupus syndromes. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;14:599–608.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hanly JG. Diagnosis and management of neuropsychiatric SLE Nat. Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10:338–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanly JG, Su L, Urowitz MB, et al. Mood disorders in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from an international inception cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(7):1837–47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bortoluzzi CA, Scirè SB, et al. Development and validation of a new algorithm for attribution of neuropsychiatric events in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology. 2015;54(5):891–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdul-Sattar AB, Goda T, Negm MG. Neuropsychiatric manifestations in a consecutive cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus: a single center study. Int J Rheum Dis. 2013;16:715–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bortoluzzi A, Padovan M, Farina I, Galuppi E, De Leonardis F, Govoni M. Therapeutic strategies in severe neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus: experience from a tertiary referral centre. Reumatismo. 2012;64:350–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kivity S, Agmon-Levin N, Zandman-Goddard G, Chapman J, Shoenfeld Y. Neuropsychiatric lupus: a mosaic of clinical presentations. BMC Med. 2015;13:43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Manca E. Autoantibodies in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE): can they be used as biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of this disease? Clinic Rev Allerg Immunol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-021-08865-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcõn GS, Gordon C, Merrill JT, Fortin PR, et al. Derivation and validation of the systemic lupus international collaborating clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(8):2677–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.34473.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hawker G, Gabriel S, Bombardier C, Goldsmith C, Caron D, Gladman D. A reliability study of SLEDAI: a disease activity index for systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 1993;20:657–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Goldsmith CH, Fortin P, Ginzler E, Gordon C, et al. The reliability of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(5):809–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahmoud GA, Shahin AA, Zayed HS, Moghazy A, Eissa BM. Clinical and immunological pattern and outcome of Egyptian systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a single center experience. Lupus. 2018;27:1562–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eissa M, Medhat BM, Moghazy A. Neuropsychiatric lupus in a sample of Egyptian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence and clinical characteristics. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl 2):1454.1–1454. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-eular.6883. In: Conference: Annual European Congress of Rheumatology, EULAR 2018, Amsterdam, 13–16 June 2018.

  19. Govoni M, Bombardieri S, Bortoluzzi A, Caniatti L, Casu C, Conti F, et al. Factors and comorbidities associated with first neuropsychiatric event in systemic lupus erythematosus: does a risk profile exist? A large multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study on 959 Italian patients. Rheumatology. 2012;51:157–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hafez N, Soltan L, Aboray AA. Study of neuropsychiatric manifestations and immunological markers in systemic lupus erythematosus. Egypt J Neurol Psychiat Neurosurg. 2007;44:333–43.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haghighi AB, Haza SG. Neuropsychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus: Iranian experience. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2010;13:108.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hajighaemi F, Etemadifar M, Bonakdar ZS. Neuropsychiatric manifestations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a study from Iran. Adv Biomed Res. 2016;5:43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kakati S, Barman B, Ahmed SU, Hussain M. Neurological manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus: a single centre study from North East India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/23773.9280.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hanly JG. The nervous system and lupus. In: Lahita RG, Tsokos G, Buyon J, Koike T, editors. Systemic lupus erythematosus. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011. p. 727–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374994-9.10040-3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Mitsikostas DD, Sfikakis PP, Goadsby PJ. A meta-analysis for headache in systemic lupus erythematosus: the evidence and the myth. Brain. 2004;127:1200–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Amit M, Molad Y, Levy O, Wysenbeek AJ. Headache in systemic lupus erythematosus and its relation to other disease manifestations. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1999;17:467–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Abel T, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB. Neuropsychiatric lupus. J Rheumatol. 1980;7:325–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mansour HE, Habeeb RA, El-Azizi NO, Afeefy HH, Nassef MA, Abd Alkader AA, Afifi N. Electroencephalography in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with neuropsychiatric manifestations. Egypt J Internal Med. 2020;32:11.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hanly JG, Urowitz MB, Su L, et al. Prospective analysis of neuropsychiatric events in an international disease inception cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(3):529–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Watad A, Tiosano S, Bragazzi NL, et al. Epilepsy among systemic lupus erythematosus patients: insights from a large database analysis. Neuroepidemiology. 2018;50(1–2):1–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hanly JG, Urowitz MB, Su L, et al. Seizure disorders in systemic lupus erythematosus results from an international, prospective, inception cohort study”. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(9):1502–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Appenzeller S, Cendes F, Costallat LT. Epileptic seizures in systemic lupus erythematosus. Neurology. 2004;63(10):1808–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosati A, Guerrini R, Cimaz R. Lupus, antiphospholipid syndrome and epilepsy: an update. Lupus. 2016;26(1):3–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanly JG, Urowitz MB, Jackson D, Bae SC, Gordon C, Wallace DJ, et al. SF- 36 summary and subscale scores are reliable outcomes of neuropsychiatric events in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:961–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Appenzeller S, Cendes F, Costallat LT. Acute psychosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int. 2008;28:237–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hanly JG, Li Q, Su L, Urowitz MB, Gordon C, Bae SC, Romero Diaz J, et al. Psychosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from an international inception cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:281–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Abrol E, Coutinho E, Chou M, Hart M, Vincent A, Howard R, et al. Psychosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): 40-year experience of a specialist centre. Rheumatology. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Medhat MB, Moghazy A, Eissa M. Prevalence and characteristics of neuropsychiatric involvement in an Egyptian cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a single-center retrospective cohort. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil. 2020;47:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43166-020-00016-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Schwartz RC, Blankenship DM. Racial disparities in psychotic dis-order diagnosis: a review of empirical literature. World J Psychiatry. 2014;4:133–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Fujieda Y. Diversity of neuropsychiatric manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunol Med. 2020;43(4):135–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Stoll T, Kauer Y, Buchi S, Klaghofer R, Sensky T, Villiger PM. Prediction of depression in systemic lupus erythematosus patients using SF-36 Mental Health scores. Rheumatology. 2009;40(6):695–8.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zakeri Z, Shakiba M, Narouie B, Mladkova N, Ghasemi-Rad M, Khosravi A. Prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Iranian experience. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32:1179–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hala AR, El Refai RM, Alrasheed HA, El Din MN. Major depression and disease activity among systemic lupus erythematosus Egyptian females. Egypt Rheumatol. 2015;37(4):S1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dietz B, Katz P, Dall’Era M, Murphy LB, Lanata C, Trupin L, et al. Major depression and adverse patient-reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a prospective longitudinal cohort. Arthritis Care Res. 2021;73:48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hanly JG, et al. Prospective analysis of neuropsychiatric events in an international disease inception cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:529–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mok CC, Lau CS, Wong RW. Neuropsychiatric manifestations and their clinical associations in southern Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:766–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ho RC, et al. A meta-analysis of serum and cerebrospinal fluid autoantibodies in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev. 2016;15:124–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Steup-Beekman GM, et al. Neuropsychiatric manifestations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: epidemiology and radiology pointing to an immune-mediated cause. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(Suppl. 2):76–9.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hanly JG, et al. Cerebrovascular events in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from an international inception cohort study. Arthritis Care Res. 2018;70:1478–87.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Oomatia A, Fang H, Petri M, Birnbaum J. Peripheral neuropa-thies in systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical features, disease associations, and immunologic characteristics evaluated over a twenty-five-year study period. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:1000–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hanly JG, Li Q, Su L, Urowitz MB, Gordon C, Bae SC, Romero Diaz J, Sanchez-Guerrero J, et al. Peripheral nervous system disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from an international inception cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:67–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Florica B, Aghdassi E, Su J, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Fortin PR. Peripheral neuropathy in patients with systemic lupus erythemato-sus. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011;41:203–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Toledano P, Orueta R, Rodriguez-Pintó I, Valls-Solé J, Cervera R, Espinosa G. Peripheral nervous system involvement in system-ic lupus erythematosus: prevalence, clinical and immunological characteristics, treatment and outcome of a large cohort from a single centre. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16:750–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Magro-Checa C, Zirkzee EJ, Huizinga TW, Steup-Beekman GM. Management of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus: current approaches and future perspectives. Drugs. 2016;76(4):459–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Magro-Checa C, Schaarenburg RA, Beaart HJ, Huizinga TW, Steup-Beekman GM, Trouw LA. Complement levels and anti-C1q autoantibodies in patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2016;25(8):878–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mehta N, Uchino K, Fakhran S. Platelet C4d is associated with acute ischemic stroke and stroke severity. Stroke. 2008;39:3236–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Oku K, Atsumi T, Bohgaki M. Complement activation in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1030–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Davis WD, Brey RL. Antiphospholipid antibodies and complement activation in patients with cerebral ischemia. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1992;10:455–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Marín J, Posso-Osorio I, Vargas S, et al. Antibodies associated with neuropsychiatric lupus: pathophysiological role, prevalence and diagnostic usefulness. Rev Colomb Reumatol. 2018;26(2):111–7.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Gelb S, Stock AD, Anzi S, et al. Mechanisms of neuropsychiatric lupus: the relative roles of the blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier versus blood-brain barrier. J Autoimmun. 2018;91:34–44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This study has no funding sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neuropsychiatry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El Sheikh, Egypt

    Salma M. Ragab

  2. Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El Sheikh, Egypt

    Amira M. Ibrahim

Authors
  1. Salma M. Ragab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amira M. Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors have contributed to designing the study, collecting and analyzing, interpretation of data, and preparing and revising the manuscript. Design of the study: SR, AI. Recruitment of patients: SR, AI. Data collection: SR, AI. Randomizing: SR, AI. Assessment: SR, AI. Statistical analysis and data interpretation: SR, AI. Manuscript preparation: SR, AI. Manuscript revision: SR, AI. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salma M. Ragab.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We confirm none of the present study’s procedures had violated the principles stated by the latest version of declaration of Helsinki. The protocol of the present study was registered by the local ethics committee of Kafrelsheikh Faculty of Medicine with approval code MKSU22-3-2021. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors, that the requirements for authorship as stated earlier in this document have been met, and that each author believes that the manuscript represents honest work.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ragab, S.M., Ibrahim, A.M. Neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus in a cohort of Egyptian patients. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 58, 32 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-022-00464-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-022-00464-y

Keywords