Skip to main content
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Open access
  • Published:

Adequate antibody response to BioNTech COVID vaccine in a multiple sclerosis patient treated with siponimod

To the editor,

We appreciated Mansoor and colleagues review entitled “COVID-19 pandemic and the risk of infection in multiple sclerosis patients on disease-modifying therapies: “what the bleep do we know?”” [1]. The authors examined available evidence guiding the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients during this pandemic, indicating that sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRM), including siponimod, could increase the risk of COVID-19 infection due to immunosuppression.

However, emerging data suggest that MS patients mount a humoral and cellular immune response even while receiving disease-modifying therapies (DMT) [2, 3]. For instance, retrospective data [2] from MS patients receiving S1PRM who completed two doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (either Pfizer or Moderna) showed positive anti-spike (S) protein antibody titers (Abbott or Roche SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay) determined forty-five and half days (average) after immunization. A wide range (16.1–80.4) of IgG index was observed. The incidence of COVID-19 infection, however, was not analyzed [2]. Surprisingly, the study suggested that based on “real-life experience”, S1PRM could potentially hamper an effective humoral response to anti-COVID-19 vaccination in MS patients, which may unnecessarily discourage urgent immunization efforts.

At the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington DC, we have followed a 73-year-old man with active progressive MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale of 5.0) since 1995. He was initially treated in 1998 with glatiramer acetate, which was switched to siponimod (2 mg daily orally) since December 2019, achieving stabilization of neurocognitive decline. His absolute lymphocyte count was decreased (0.3 K/cmm, reference range 0.8–3.1 K/cmm) since July 2020. He received two doses of the BNT162b2 Pfizer vaccine (2/1/2021 and 2/22/2021), and his quarterly laboratory work-up (complete cell blood counts, serum immunoglobulins, thyroid function, liver function, Chem 7, urine analysis, and fecal occult blood) has been unremarkable, except for stable mild lymphopenia (0.3 K/cmm, 7/26/21) and mildly decreased IgM of 36 mg/dl (reference range 43–279 mg/dl). Additional immune evaluation (including lymphocyte subsets) was not performed. Anti-COVID-19 antibody testing was performed about 160 days after completion of vaccination (6/28/2021) and was positive for S (42.3 U/ml units, Eclisys, Roche) and negative for anti-nucleocapsid (0 U/ml, Eclisys, Roche) proteins, indicating adequate immune response to vaccination and absence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Universal consensus on anti-COVID-19 vaccination in MS patients treated with DMT is still emerging [2]. PubMed does not yield real-life data on the use of siponimod in MS patients exposed to COVID-19 or vaccination against it. Diminished immune response to non-COVID-19 vaccines have been reported after treatment with siponimod [4], which may be less immunosuppressive than fingolimod (another S1RP inhibitor). Caution is necessary while using DMT in MS [1,2,3]. One must also consider that many studies are limited to static analysis of humoral responses without correlates with cell blood counts or neutralizing activity [2]. Further research is necessary to determine if DMT hamper appropriate immune responses, especially since the BNT162b2 vaccine also elicits T-cell immunity [5]. In summary, our experience suggests that siponimod may not significantly alter humoral immunity against COVID-19 vaccination, and may contribute to encourage vaccination against this pandemic in MS patients receiving DMT.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets supporting the conclusion of this article are included within the article.



Coronavirus disease 2019


Multiple sclerosis


Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators


Disease-modifying therapies


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2


Basic metabolic panel


Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine


  1. Mansoor S, Kelly S, Murphy K, Waters A, Siddiqui NS. COVID-19 pandemic and the risk of infection in multiple sclerosis patients on disease modifying therapies: "what the bleep do we know? Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg. 2020;56(1):44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bigaut K, Kremer L, Fleury M, Lanotte L, Collongues N, de Seze J, et al. Impact of disease-modifying treatments on humoral response after COVID-19 vaccination: a mirror of the response after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2021;177:1237–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Al Jumah M, Abulaban A, Aggad H, Al Bunyan R, AlKhawajah M, Al Malik Y, Almejally M, Alnajashi H, Alshamrani F, Bohlega S, Cupler EJ, ElBoghdady A, Makkawi S, Qureshi S, Shami S, et al. Managing multiple sclerosis in the Covid19 era: a review of the literature and consensus report from a panel of experts in Saudi Arabia. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021;51:102925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ufer M, Shakeri-Nejad K, Gardin A, Su Z, Paule I, Marbury TC, Legangneux E, et al. Impact of siponimod on vaccination response in a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2017;4(6):e398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sahin U, Muik A, Derhovanessian E, Vogler I, Kranz LM, Vormehr M, Baum A, Pascal K, Quandt J, Maurus D, Brachtendorf S, Lörks V, Sikorski J, Hilker R, Becker D, Eller A, Grützner J, Boesler C, Rosenbaum C, Kühnle M, Luxemburger U, Kemmer-Brück A, Langer D, Bexon M, Bolte S, Karikó K, Palanche T, Fischer B, Schultz A, Shi P, Fontes-Garfias C, Perez JL, Swanson KA, Loschko J, Scully I, Cutler M, Kalina W, Kyratsous CA, Cooper D, Dormitzer P, Jansen KU, Türeci Ö, et al. COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b1 elicits human antibody and TH1 T cell responses. Nature. 2020;586:594–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



GS: design, literature search, discussion, first draft, critical comments. VN: design, literature search, discussion, critical comments, final approval. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gulnaz Siddiqui.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors confirm that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siddiqui, G., Maloni, H. & Nava, V.E. Adequate antibody response to BioNTech COVID vaccine in a multiple sclerosis patient treated with siponimod. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 57, 171 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: