Sequential approach of internal maxillary-to-middle cerebral artery bypass and endovascular occlusion for giant middle cerebral artery aneurysm: a case report

Abstract

Background

The combined approach to complex brain МСА aneurysm seems to be generally considered viable. Although it is fairly common, the combinations of modalities, which are suggested in different case reports, vary significantly. This case discusses a sequential approach of reconstructive microsurgery with internal maxillary-to-middle cerebral artery bypass followed by the balloon test occlusion and endovascular embolization of the aneurysm and the MCA. The combined approach together with use of maxillary artery helped minimize the intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Case presentation

A 62-year-old female with rare episodes of headache and depression revealed giant middle cerebral artery aneurysm. The patient underwent a combined operation in a hybrid operating room with no serious neurologic deficit after surgery.

Conclusions

Multimodality management in a hybrid operating room should be considered in case of complex fusiform aneurysm of MCA, which is associated with high risks of clipping. Thus, the sequential procedures will improve patient outcomes in treatment of complex МСА aneurysms.

Background

In the past few years, we have witnessed combined approach taking a leading role in the management of complex aneurysm after conventional therapy with a single modality had failed. Complex cases of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm are the best example of an aneurysm for which either approach rather than a combined one is an unlikely solution.

The combined approach is preferable due to the following features of the complex MCA aneurysm: a very broad neck (dome-to-neck ratio < 1.5); the absence of a neck, such as in fusiform aneurysms or saccular-fusiform aneurysms; the presence of severe atherosclerosis or calcification in the neck area; the presence of extensive thrombosis inside the aneurysm; the origin of critical branches from the aneurysm sac or neck; symptomatic dissecting aneurysms; and small blister aneurysms that have no neck at all [1].

Case presentation

Patient Information

A 62-year-old right-handed woman suffered from virus meningoencephalitis when she was 15 years old. Subsequently, she had 15 min night panic attacks with hallucinations, hemihypesthesia without seizures. This paroxysm stopped in 5 years with no treatment. In 2015 MR tomography, MR angiography showed right basal ganglion atrophy and 2 aneurysms of the right MCA. The patient underwent endovascular operation of M1 segment in 2015 at another medical center. Recently, she has had rare episodes of headache and depression; therefore, she received counseling with a psychotherapist and has taken carbamazepine 400 mg a day. She has no serious neurologic deficit.

Imaging studies

Computed tomography (CT) angiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conducted at our neurosurgical center revealed a big partial thrombosed fusiform M1 segment aneurysm of the right MCA (15 × 12.5 × 17.5 mm) and a small saccular aneurysm of the anterior temporal artery (5 × 4 × 4 mm), which was endovascularly occluded (Figs. 1 and 2).

Fig. 1

MRI revealed a giant fusiform thrombosed aneurysm in M1 segment of the right MCA

Fig. 2

CT angiography showed a fusiform aneurysm in M1 segment of the right MCA

Surgical findings

Preoperative diagnostic Matas test revealed a reversible weakness in the left arm and leg for 5 min, which confirmed the insufficient collateral blood flow ruling out the possibility of a destructive operation. For this reason, we decided to apply a bypass anastomosis and then perform endovascular occlusion of the MCA and aneurysm.

The operation was conducted in the hybrid operating room equipped with intraoperative angiography and flat panel CT-perfusion (Artis zeego, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). Firstly, a pterional craniotomy with resection of the zygomatic arch was performed to facilitate retraction of the temporalis muscle to the lower part. The internal maxillary artery (IMaxA) was exposed in the pterygopalatine fossa. The proximal IMaxA was then secured with a temporary clip, and the distal end divided with ligation. An end-to-end anastomosis was applied connecting the radial artery graft and the proximal segment of the MA. The distal end of the donor graft was then anastomosed with M2 segment of the right MCA. Within 2 postoperative days, there were no neurological complications. The CT angiography showed a good patency of the bypass (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

CT angiography showed a good patency of the bypass

Postoperative course

After a 2-day observation, we executed the conventional МСА occlusion with a balloon tip catheter and assessment of neurological condition for 10 min (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Balloon test occlusion with good potency of the IMaxA-to-MCA bypass

Meanwhile, the CT perfusion test with cerebral blood volume (CBV) assessment was conducted to reveal the possible ischemic damage to the brain [2] (Fig. 5). Over this time, no neurological complications were detected.

Fig. 5

Flat panel CT perfusion (CBV) showed no perfusion differences between brain hemispheres

There was a good graft blood supply of the temporal, parietal, and frontal branches during the MCA occlusion, which was identified by the cerebral angiography. Finally, the proximal part of the aneurysm and the parent MCA artery were successfully occluded with platinum spiral coils (Figs. 6 and 7). The patient received 3000 units of heparin intravenously during endovascular procedures.

Fig. 6

Cerebral angiography showed MCA occlusion and a good graft blood supply. Sagittal projection

Fig. 7

MRI cerebral angiography showed MCA occlusion and a good graft blood supply. Frontal projection

Postoperative MRI angiography revealed a total aneurysm occlusion and good filling of distal MCA branches maintained by the bypass (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8

MRI angiography revealed a total aneurysm occlusion and good filling of distal MCA branches

The patient recovered quickly without any neurological deterioration and was discharged home in good condition in 10 days.

Discussion

The preoperative Matas occlusion test confirmed that a destructive operation was impossible. The fusiform structure of the aneurysm as well as the origin angle of M2 MCA segments did not allow for a flow diverter stent [3]. Indeed, the chosen approach is complex but less risky, while endovascular stenting is less complex but more risky. According to case reporters and a cohort study, flow diverters in giant aneurysms are associated with higher risks of thrombosis and recurrences (20%) [4,5,6]. This is even more likely for MCA with perforating branches. In view of the planned occlusion of the MCA supplying the aneurysm, we were to choose the suitable bypass that would substitute for the MCA. The fusiform structure, giant size, and partial thrombosis of the aneurysm does not allow for its clipping. Thus, the conventional bypass, such as low flow extracranial-to-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass of the superior temporal artery, was rejected because of the minor diameter of the given artery in the patient and therefore insufficient blood flow. The only option left was a high flow bypass [7,8,9]. Out of the two types of high flow bypass, we decided on the IMaxA-to-MCA bypass which has a number of advantages over the conventional EC-IC bypass. These advantages include the following: shorter graft length, avoidance of a cervical carotid artery dissection and its attendant complications, a microsurgical view of the entirety of the intracranial graft and both the proximal and distal anastomoses within the same field, and minimization of the risk of graft kinking and compression. These benefits are highlighted in cadaveric and radiological studies aimed to define the IMaxA anatomy, illustrate a novel method for harvesting, and prepare it for extracranial-to-intracranial bypass [10,11,12,13]. Several recent articles discussed good outcomes of IMaxA to MCA bypass in patients with different complex aneurysms [14,15,16,17].

Out of two ways of occlusion, namely, the microsurgical and the endovascular occlusions, the latter is preferable due to a number of advantages. The former approach requires additional microsurgical dissection of a big fusiform aneurysm, which raises a risk of brain damage. Moreover, microsurgical procedure involves somatosensory and motor evoked potentials monitoring, which results in significant false-negative rates and inconsistencies because of patient unconsciousness [18, 19]. By contrast, endovascular occlusion is not conducted in one go, which means that balloon test occlusion (BTO) is utilized before the occlusion of MCA. Since 1974, BTO has been used for major cervical and intracranial vessels [20, 21]. This allows for assessment of the ischemic deficits while the patient is awake. Besides, there are good possibilities to visualize bypass potency in angiographic pictures. In his research, Lawton at al. proved the efficacy of BTO in combined operations on complex aneurysms [3]. It is worth noting that the time spell between bypass surgery and endovascular aneurysm occlusion should be 48–72 h to confirm the absence of bypass thrombosis and give time for the anastomose endothelialization [22, 23].

Conclusion

This combination of MA-MCA bypass with subsequent BTO and endovascular embolization of a complex MCA aneurysm has not been reviewed in medical studies. Multimodality management in a hybrid operating room should be considered a welcome addition that will improve patient outcomes in treatment of complex aneurysms.