Skip to main content

Role of magnetic susceptibility-weighted imaging in characterization of cerebral microbleeds in acute ischemic stroke Egyptian obese patients

Abstract

Objective

The study was done to investigate the role of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) in characterization of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and incidence of CMBs in acute ischemic stroke obese patients.

Materials and methods

We recruited 120 acute ischemic stroke obese patients. All participants or their relatives gave written informed consent. MRI of the brain with SWI sequences was done for all patients.

Results

SWI showed 30% of the patients have CMBs. The total numbers of CMBs were statistically significant higher in small vessel diseases (SVDs) than large vessel diseases (LVDs) (P = 0.008). According to the severity scale, CMBs were more prominent in patients with grade 0 (70%) followed by grade III (25.8%) then grade II (4.2%). BMI was independent risk factors for developing CMBs as shown in simple regression analysis (х2 = 6.008, P = 0.002). SVDs and hypertension were statistically significant independent predictors and had higher odds to exhibit CMBs. Patients with SVDs had 5.3 times higher odds to exhibit CMBs (P = 0.002) while patients with hypertension had 3.9 times higher odds to exhibit CMBs (P = 0.032).

Conclusion

SWI is a gold standard MR imaging technique in diagnosis and characterization of CMBs with more prevalence especially in obese patients suffering from acute ischemia stroke due to SVDs. Hypertension was an independent risk factor for development of CMBs but IHD, use of antiplatelet medications, increased BMI, and dyslipidemia must be taken into consideration.

Introduction

Obesity has a detrimental effect on health; it increases the risk of developing hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and cerebral stroke [1, 2]. Obesity is considered a modifiable risk factor for both hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke in both sexes [3].

Several studies reported the linear relationship between body mass index (BMI) and ischemic stroke but not hemorrhagic stroke [4].

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), white matter hyperintensities (WMH), and lacunes; all are common radiological imaging biomarkers of cerebral small vessel diseases (SVDs) [5].

CMBs have been observed in patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke with frequency between 4 and 5% in healthy people, and can increase to 50–70% in patients with cerebrovascular disease [6].

Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is a newly developed MRI technique. SWI can differentiate the magnetic susceptibility effect of different components like blood products, deoxygenated blood, calcium, and iron. SWI employs a fully flow-compensated, high-resolution, 3D gradient-echo pulse using either separate or combined phase and magnitude images, in order to characterize brain tissue. Postprocessing of SW imaging includes combination of magnitude images with phase images [7].

SWI allows better detection of CMBs compared with 2D using a gradient-echo (GRE) pulse sequence. The high sensitivity detection rate of CMBs by SWI is due to the longer scan time as well as the high-spatial resolution 3D imaging [8].

In SWI, CMBs appear as small hypointense foci with size ranged from 2 to 10 mm. CMBs occur as a result of focal accumulations of hemosiderin-containing macrophages that have a paramagnetic effect causing signal loss due to susceptibility effects [9].

In MRI, phase images can differentiate between calcification from CMBs as iron is a paramagnetic material while calcium is a diamagnetic material with opposing phase shifts so CMBs appear either low signal or high signal on phase image depending on the type of MR machine, whether the imager uses a left- or right-handed coordinate system [8].

CMBs are commonly asymptomatic but are considered a predictive factor of future recurrent ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and considered to be clinically correlated with chronic hypertension, aging, and WMH [10, 11].

CMBs were classified into three groups according to their locations in SWI: lobar (cortical-subcortical white matter), deep (deep gray matter, basal ganglia, thalamus, the white matter of corpus callosum, internal, external and extreme capsule), and infra-tentorial (brain stem and cerebellum) [12, 13].

The distribution pattern of CMBs indicates different mechanisms, CMBs located in the deep white matter associated with hypertensive arteriopathy, whereas those in the lobe are more likely associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), with recent research shows that lobar CMBs are associated with changes in cognitive function [14, 15].

Many studies have shown that CMBs have not an important impact on hemorrhagic transformation only but they also consider as an independent risk factor for new ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and stroke recurrence [16]. Therefore, the role of CMBs is important for the prevention and treatment of various strokes [17].

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of SWI in characterization of CMBs and incidence of CMBs in acute ischemic stroke obese patients.

Patients and methods

This is a cross sectional study that was approved by Research Ethics Committee (REC) for Human Subject and Animal Research at the Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt (serial13-2020). We recruited 120 patients admitted to the neurology department of Helwan University Hospitals from February to April 2020, these patients were obese and presented with acute ischemic stroke diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) brain, and all participants or their relatives gave written informed consent. The procedures we performed were in accordance with our protocol; brain MRI with SWI sequences was done for all patients.

We recruited obese patients of both sexes, ≥ 60 years of age; patients that were before this age, showed mimic ischemic stroke diseases, refused consent, or who were contraindicated to brain MRI were excluded. All patients underwent full history taking and complete neurological examination stressing on medication drugs especially anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy with high focus on vascular risk factors. Blood samples for laboratory investigation were obtained after overnight fasting and serum total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglyceride (TG), and fasting plasma glucose levels.

Acute ischemic stroke subtype SVDs and large vessel disease (LVDs) were diagnosed on the basis of cranial CT and MRI findings together with medical history, neurological signs and symptoms, and physical examination obtained at admission.

Vascular risk factors

Cerebral small vessel disease refers to a diverse range of clinical and neuroimaging findings resulting from pathological changes of various etiologies affecting the cerebral small vessels, particularly small veins, venules, capillaries, arterioles, and small arteries [18]. Cerebral large vessel disease is defined as disease affecting the proximal intracranial anterior and posterior circulation [19].

Hypertension was defined as self-reported hypertension, treatment with antihypertensive medication, a systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg, and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mm Hg [20]. Diabetes mellitus was defined as a fasting blood glucose level 126 mg/dL, a random blood glucose level 200 mg/dL, or treatment with oral antidiabetic drugs or insulin [21].

Dyslipidemia was defined as a serum TC level 200 mg/dl, serum TG ≥ 150 mg/dL, HDL-C ≤ 40 mg/dL in males and ≤ 50 mg/dL in female, LDP-C ≥ 100 mg/dL, or treatment with lipid-lowering drugs [22]. A current smoker was defined as a person who smoked at least 1 cigarette per day habitually or some days in the last 30 days preceding an interview [23]. Body mass index (BMI) calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meter squared and classified patients into overweight ≥ 25(pre-obese 25–29.99) and obese ≥ 30 (grade I (30–34.99), grade II (35–34.99), and grade III ≥ 40) [24].

MRI and SWI sequence protocol

All 120 patients performed conventional MRI with axial SWI images by 1.5-T MR machine (Philips, Achieva 1.5 T, Philips health care, Netherlands Holland); the following sequences were done: axial TSE T1-axial-weighted image (TR 400 ms TE 14 ms flip angle 90°), axial and coronal TSE T2-weighted image (WI, TR 2500 ms TE 88 ms flip angle, 90°), and axial and sagittal FLAIR FS (TR 9000 ms TE 127 ms). Diffusion-sensitizing gradients were done, axial SWI (TR 78 ms TE 47 ms flip angle 15°slice thickness 1.5 mm) both the magnitude and phase images were done, and then post processing was done by combining the phase and magnitude images to create SWI and also created minimum intensity projection image (MIP)

Image analysis

CMBs were described as small round foci with hypointense signals that ranged from 2 to 10 mm in diameter on the SWI images.

Other areas of hypointense signal loss as vascular flow voids, areas of symmetric hypointensity, and areas in the basal ganglia, that represented calcification or non-hemorrhagic iron deposits, were excluded. Small foci of calcifications displayed hypointense signal loss in SWI images were excluded by phase images.

CMBs were classified into 3 types according to their location: lobar type that includes cortical or subcortical location (Fig. 1); deep type that included deep gray matter, thalamus, basal ganglia as well as white matter of the external, internal, extreme capsule, corpus callosum, cerebellum and brain stem (Fig. 2); and mixed type (Fig. 3) [11].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Lobar type cerebral microbleeds. Axial brain SWI images (ac) show multiple signal loss areas of cerebral microbleeds in the cortical gyri and subcortical white matter

Fig. 2
figure 2

Deep type cerebral microbleeds. Axial brain SWI images (ac) show multiple signal loss areas of cerebral microbleeds in the periventricular deep white matter, basal ganglia, and both thalami

Fig. 3
figure 3

Mixed type cerebral microbleeds. Axial brain SWI images (ac) show bilateral multiple signal loss areas of cerebral microbleeds in the, basal ganglia, both thalami, deep periventricular and subcortical white matter, and cortical gyri

CMBs foci number was reported for each patient. According to the number of foci, the CMB severity was classified into 4 grades: in which grade 0  =  absent CMBs foci, grade 1  =  1 CMBs foci lesion, grade 2  =  2 to 5 CMBs foci lesions, grade 3  =  more than 6 CMBs foci lesions [25].

Statistical analysis

Data were entered and analyzed using IBM-SPSS software (IBM Corp. released 2017; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Qualitative data were expressed as frequency and percentage. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test according to sample size of cells (expected counts) was used for comparing qualitative data. Chi-square test was used if sample size was ≥ 5 units per cell while Fisher’s exact test was used if sample size was < 5 units in ≥ one cell. Quantitative data were initially tested for normality using Shapiro-Wilk’s test with data being normally distributed if P > 0.050. Presence of significant outliers (extreme values) was tested for by inspecting boxplots. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) if normally distributed or median and interquartile range (IQR) if not. To compare quantitative data for two groups, Mann-Whitney U test was used. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to predict the likelihood of occurrence of microbleeds. Crude odds ratio was initially calculated for each predictor and then a model was run to get the odds ratios of independent predictors. For any of the used tests, results were considered as statistically significant if P value ≤ 0.050.

Results

Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the study cohort: Our study included 120 patients. Fifty-four patients were (45%) males and 66 patients were (55%) females; the participants aged from 60 to 88 years and their median age was 68 years [IQR was 64–75]. As regards BMI, 43 (35.8%) patients were overweight, 77 (64.2%) patients were obese [grade I = 53, grade II = 18, grade III = 6 patients]. The median BMI was 31.1(maximum was 45 and minimum was 25.8) and IQR 29.1–34.7.

In our study, there were 62 (51.7%) hypertensive patients, 48(40%) diabetes mellitus (DM) patients, 53(44.2%) IHD patients, 17 patients (14.2%) were suffering from atrial fibrillation (AF), 25 patients (20.8%) were smokers, 51patients (42.5%) were on antiplatelet medications, 17 patients (14.2%) were on anticoagulant medication, and 54 patients (45%) suffered from dyslipidemia.

Brain MRI was done to all patients; 32 patients (26.7%) suffered from SVDs and 88 patients (73.3%) suffered from LVDs. SWI showed 36 patients (30%) of cases suffered from CMBs (31 cortical, 35 deep, 36 mixed, and 18 infra-tentorial) (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of the study cohort (n = 120)

Frequency of CMBs

By SWI lobar type, CMBs ranged from 0 to 57; its median was 5 and IQR was 3 to 9 in SVDs, while in LVDs, CMBs ranged from 0 to 33, its median was 2 and IQR was 1–8. Lobar CMBs were statistically significantly higher in SVDs than LVDs (P = 0.066).

Deep type CMBs ranged from 0 to 80, its median was 10, and IQR was 7 to 23 in SVDs while it ranged from 1 to 48, its median was 4, and IQR was (2 to 8) in LVDs. Deep CMBs were statistically significantly higher in SVDs than LVDs (P = 0.008).

Mixed type CMBs ranged from 6 to 125, its median was 15, and IQR was 9 to 32 in SVDs, while LVD ranged from 2 to 81, its median was 7, and IQR was 3 to 14. Mixed type CMBs were statistically significantly higher in SVDs than LVDs (P = 0.009).

Infra-tentorial type CMBs ranged from 0 to 18, its median was 3, and IQR was 0 to 5 in SVDs, while it ranged from (0 to 3), its median was 0, and IQR was (0 to 2) in LVDs. Infra-tentorial CMBs were statistically significantly higher in SVDs than LVDs (P = 0.025).

In comparing total numbers of CMBs in SVD and LVD, there were statistically significant higher number of CMBs in SVDs than LVDs (P = 0.008) (Table 2).

Table 2 Frequency and location of CMBs

Severity of CMBs

According to severity of CMBs by SWI, there were 84 patients (70%) with grade 0, 5 patients (4.2%) grade II, and 30 patients (25.8%) grade III and there was no patient in grade I.

Univariate analysis of predictors of CMBs

Simple logistic regression test was run to ascertain the effects of sex, BMI (kg/m2), hypertension, DM, dyslipidemia, AF, IHD, smoking history, antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulant therapy, MRI, serum TC (mg/dl), serum TG (mg/dl), LDL-C (mg/dl), and serum HDL-C (mg/dl) on the likelihood that participants CMBs. Of all univariate predictors of CMBs, the simple logistic regression model was statistically significant by comparing obese versus overweight (х2 = 6.008, P = 0.002) and has 3.107 higher odds to exhibit CMBs. An increase in BMI category by one class has 2.223 higher odds to exhibit CMBs. The simple logistic regression model was statistically significant as univariate predictors of CMBs for dyslipidemia versus non-dyslipidemia (х2 = 7.414, P = 0.008) has 3.025 odds to exhibit CMBs; also the simple logistic regression model was statistically significant as univariate predictors of CMBs for IHD, antiplatelet drug therapy (P = 0.016 and P = 0.023), respectively. The simple logistic regression model for brain MRI showed SVDs versus LVDs was the strongest univariate predictors of CMBs (х2 = 31.202, P < 0.001) and had 11.629 higher odds to exhibit CMBs followed by hypertension versus normotensive patients (х2 = 20.652, P < 0.001) and had 8.125 higher odds to exhibit CMBs as in Table 3

Table 3 Univariate analysis of predictors of CMBs

Predictors of the likelihood of occurrence of CMBs

A binomial logistic regression was run to ascertain the effects of presence of SVDs on MRI, presence of hypertension, BMI (kg/m2), serum TC (mg/dl), LDL-C (mg/dl), presence of IHD, and use of antiplatelet medications on the likelihood that participants have microbleeds. There were 5 studentized residuals with values of 2.167, 2.167, 2.477, 2.002, and 2.272 SD which were kept in the analysis. The logistic regression model was statistically significant, χ2 (7) = 39.376, P < 0.001. The model explained 39.7% (Nagelkerke R2) of the variance in microbleeds and correctly classified 82.5% of cases. Sensitivity was 61.1%, specificity was 91.7%, positive predictive value was 75.9%, and negative predictive value was 84.6%. Of the eight predictor variables, only presence of small vessel disease on MRI and presence of hypertension were statistically significant independent predictors. Patients with small vessel disease on MRI had 5.3 times higher odds to exhibit microbleeds (P = 0.002) and patients with hypertension had 3.9 times higher odds to exhibit microbleeds (P = 0.032) as in Table 4.

Table 4 Predictors of the likelihood of occurrence of CMBs

Discussion

In this study, SWI showed 36 patients suffered from CMBs (31 cortical, 35 deep, 36 mixed and 18 infra-tentorial); according to that, the prevalence of CMBs in this study was 30% (68.8% in SVDs &15.9% in LVDs) with high statistically significantly difference in SVDs (χ2 = 31.201, P < 0.001); while Potigumjon and his colleagues reported that the prevalence of CMBs in ischemic stroke patients was 20%, Kwa and his colleagues found that the incidence of CMBs in ischemic stroke patient was 6% [26, 27].

In our study, the number of CMBs was statistically significantly higher in SVDs versus LVDs in comparing location: deep, mixed (lobar and deep), infra-tentorial, and total number in both groups (P = 0.008, P = 0.009, P = 0.025, P = 0.008), respectively, but not in lobar location (P = 0.066).

In this study, we observed the majority of the cases presented with CMBs were mixed, deep, lobar then infra-tentorial location; this was inconsistent with Pantoni who reported that CMBs were mainly observed in lobar brain regions [28].

As regards MBI, CMBs were higher significantly difference in the obese group when compared with the overweight group which had 3.107 higher odds to exhibit CMB (χ2 = 6.008, P = 0.017), furthermore, an increase in BMI category by one grade has 2.223 higher odds to exhibit CMB, (grade II = 4.446, grade III = 6.669) (P = 0.002). This is consistent with Mitaki and his colleagues; they found that increased BMI was associated with increased incidence of deep and infra-tentorial CMBs; however, the positive association between incidence of CMBs and BMI is still controversial [11].

In our study hypertension was strong independent risk factor in development of CMBs (χ2 = 20.652, P < 0.001); this was consistent with Vernooij et al. [10] as they reported CMBs were independently associated with higher systolic blood pressure and inconsistent with Mitaki and his colleagues who found that the hypertension were not associated with increased incidence of CMBs [11].

In this study, we found that CMBs were statistically significantly higher in dyslipidemic patients (χ2 = 7.414, P = 0.008). Serum TC and serum LDL-C were significantly associated with increased incidence of CMBs (P = 0.002 and P = 0.004), respectively, with no association with serum TG and serum HDL-C. This is inconsistent with Mitaki et al. [11] that dyslipidemia was not associated with increased incidence of CMBs.

In this study, we founded that patients who suffered from IHD and received antiplatelet drugs were more prone to develop CMBs with higher statistically significant difference when compared with nonusers (χ2 = 5.988, P = 0.016); this is consistent with Huo and his colleagues and also with Vernooij and his colleagues that the prevalence of CMBs were higher in patients treated with antiplatelet drugs used in the primary and secondary prevention of thrombotic cardiovascular disease, including acute coronary syndrome compared with nonusers [29, 30].

We founded in our research that the prevalence of CMB was higher in patients who received antiplatelet with a statistically significant difference when compared with nonuser (58.3%), P = 0.023. while Lihong and his colleagues reported that CMBs occurred in 40.0% of patients taking aspirin for at least 1 year and 30.7% of patients taking clopidogrel for at least 1 year [31].

In our study, we founded that patients with SVDs on brain MRI were statistically significantly higher when compared with LVDs to develop CMBs (χ2 = 31.201, P < 0.001).

In this study, we did not find any statistically significant difference as regards sex (female and male), diabetic and non-diabetic, and AF and non AF patients; patients received anticoagulant therapy, serum TG, and serum HDL-C in prevalence of CMBs. Mitaki et al. [11] found that elevated fasting glucose was not associated with increased incidence of CMBs, inconsistent with Saito and his colleagues who reported that the incidence of CMBs in patients with AF is significantly higher than that in patients without AF [32].

In our research, we found that a binomial logistic regression to ascertain the effects of presence of SVDs on MRI, presence of hypertension, BMI (kg/m2), serum TC (mg/dl), LDL-C (mg/dl), presence of IHD, and use of antiplatelet medications on the likelihood that participants had microbleeds. Of the seven predictor variables, only the presence of small vessel disease on MRI and presence of hypertension were statistically significant independent predictors to develop CMBs. Patients with SVDs on SWI had 5.3 times higher odds to exhibit microbleeds (P = 0.002), and patients with hypertension had 3.9 times higher odds to exhibit microbleeds (P = 0.032)

Conclusion

SWI is a gold standard MR imaging technique in diagnosis and characterization of CMBs with more prevalence especially in obese patients suffering from acute ischemia stroke due to small vessel disease. Hypertension is an independent risk factor for the development of CMBs but IHD, use of antiplatelet medications, increased BMI, and dyslipidemia must be taken into consideration.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the results of this article are included within the article.

Abbreviations

AF:

Atrial fibrillation

BMI:

Body mass index

BP:

Blood pressure

CAA:

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy

CMBs:

Cerebral microbleeds

CT:

Computed tomography

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

GRE:

Gradient recall echo

HDL:

High-density lipoprotein

IHD:

Ischemic heart disease

IQR:

Interquartile range

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein

LVDs:

Large vessel diseases

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

SD:

Standard deviation

SVDs:

Small vessel diseases

SWI:

Susceptibility-weighted imaging

TC:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglyceride

WI:

Weighted imaging

WMD:

White matter disease

References

  1. Flegal KM, Kit BK, Orpana H, Graubard BI. Association of all- cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013;309:71–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Strazzullo P, D’Elia L, Cairella G, Garbagnati F, Cappuccio FP, Scalfi L. Excess body weight and incidence of stroke: Meta-analysis of prospective studies with 2 million participants. Stroke. 2010;41:e418–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ni Mhurchu C, Rodgers A, Pan WH, Gu DF, Woodward M. Body mass index and cardiovascular disease in the Asia-Pacific Region: an overview of 33 cohorts involving 310 000 participants. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33:751–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Park JW, Lee S-Y, Kim SY, Choe H, Jee SH. BMI and stroke risk in Korean women. Obesity. 2008;16:396–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wardlaw JM, Smith EE, Biessels GJ, Cordonnier C, Fazekas F, Frayne R. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:822–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenberg SM, Vernooij MW, Cordonnier C, Viswanathan A, Salman R, Warach AS, et al. Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:165–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Offenbacher H, Fazekas F, Schmidt R, Koch M, Fazekas G, Kapeller P. MR of cerebral abnormalities concomitant with primary intracerebral hematomas. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1996;17:573–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Han F, Zhai F, Wang Q, Zhou L, Ni J, Yao M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of cerebral small vessel disease in a Chinese population-based sample. J Stroke. 2018;20(2):239–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thijs V, Lemmens R, Schoofs C, Gorner A, Van Damme P, Schrooten M, et al. Microbleeds and the risk of recurrent stroke. Stroke. 2010;41(9):2005–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vernooij MW, van der Lugt A, Ikram MA, Wielopolski PA, Niessen WJ, Hofman A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of cerebral microbleeds: The Rotterdam Scan Study. Neurology. 2008;70:1208–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitaki S, Takayoshi H, Nakagawa T, Nagai A, Oguro H, Yamaguchi S. Metabolic syndrome is associated with incidence of deep cerebral microbleeds. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0194182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chung CP, Chou KH, Chen WT, Liu LK, Lee WJ, Chen LK, et al. Strictly lobar cerebral microbleeds are associated with cognitive impairment. Stroke. 2016;47:2497–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shams S, Granberg T, Martola J, Charidimou A, Li X, Shams M, et al. Cerebral microbleeds topography and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in cognitive impairment. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37:1006–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boeckh-Behrens T, Lutz J, Lummel N, Burke M, Wesemann T, Schöpf V, et al. Susceptibility-weighted angiography (SWAN) of cerebral veins and arteries compared to TOF-MRA. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:1238–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shams S, Martola J, Cavallin L, Granberg T, Shams M, Aspelin P, et al. SWI or T2: which MRI sequence to use in the detection of cerebral microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study. Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(6):1089–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Soo YO, Siu DY, Abrigo J, Yu S, Ng N, Ahuja AT, et al. Risk of intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with cerebral microbleeds undergoing endovascular intervention. Stroke. 2012;43:1532–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Charidimou A, Kakar P, Fox Z, Werring DJ. Cerebral microbleeds and recurrent stroke risk: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack cohorts. Stroke. 2013;44:995–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pantoni L, Gorelick PB. Cerebral small vessel disease. First ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Rennert RC, Wali AR, Steinberg JA, Santiago-Dieppa DR, Olson SE, Pannell JS, Khalessi AA. Neurosurgery. 2019;85(Suppl 1):S4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. SPRINT Research Group, Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, Snyder JK, et al. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Association AD. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Suppl, 1):S81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2889–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/326043/9789241516204-eng.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Consultation WHO. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao Z, Wang W, Wang Z, Zhao X, Shang Y, et al. Cerebral microbleeds are associated with deep white matter hyperintensities, but only in hypertensive patients. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e91637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091637.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Potigumjon A, Watcharakorn A, Dharmasaroja PA. Prevalence of cerebral microbleeds in Thai patients with ischemic stroke. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2017;8:216–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kwa VI, Franke CL. Verbeeten B jr, Stam J. Silent intracerebral microhemorrahage in patients with ischemic stroke. Amsterdam vascular Medicine group. Ann Neurol. 1998;44:362–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pantoni L. Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:689–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Huo Y, Zhang Y, Han Y, Yan H, Ge J. Cardiovascular diseases in China: the blue book myocardial infarction. Cardiol Plus. 2017;2:39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vernooij MW, Haag MD, van der Lugt A, Hofman A, Krestin GP, Stricker BH, et al. Use of antithrombotic drugs and the presence of cerebral microbleeds: The Rotterdam Scan Study. Arch Neurol. 2009;66:6.714–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ge L, Ouyang X, Ban C, Yu H, Wu Q, Wu H, et al. Cerebral microbleeds in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease taking aspirin or clopidogrel. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(9):e14685.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Saito T, Kawamura Y, Tanabe Y, Asanome A, Takahashi K, Sawada J, et al. Cerebral microbleeds and asymptomatic cerebral infarctions in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23:1616–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all patients and control subjects for their willingness to participate in this study.

Funding

There is no source of funding for the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AAM and CAZ carried out the work. AAM performed the procedure, did the statistical analysis, and was responsible for collecting the scientific data and writing the initial draft of the manuscript. CAZ designed the protocol shared in collecting the scientific data. CAZ interpreted the radiology of all patients. Both authors read and approved the final version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Ahmed Abou Elmaaty.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors obtained permission to conduct this study that was approved by Research Ethics Committee (REC) for Human Subject and animal Research at the Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt (serial 13-2020). All participants gave written informed consent. The procedures followed were in accordance with our protocol. We recruited 120 patients admitted to the neurology department of Helwan University Hospitals from February to April 2020.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abou Elmaaty, A.A., Zarad, C.A. Role of magnetic susceptibility-weighted imaging in characterization of cerebral microbleeds in acute ischemic stroke Egyptian obese patients. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 56, 72 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-020-00202-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-020-00202-2

Keywords