Skip to main content

Prevalence of migraine in Upper Egypt

Abstract

Background

Migraine is a significant health problem due its frequency and accompanying morbidity.

Objectives

This study aims to estimate the prevalence of migraine headache among the population of Al-Quseir city (Upper Egypt) and its impact on the patients’ life.

Methods

This study is part of a door-to-door survey of major neurological disorders in Al-Quseir city, Red Sea Governorate. All inhabitants (n = 33,285 persons) were screened through door to door by three specialists of neurology. Then, positive cases were subjected to clinical and neurological examination by three staff members of neurology each separately. Respondents were identified as suffering from migraine with aura, migraine without aura, and probable migraine as defined by the diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society (IHS). Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) questionnaire was used to assess the impact of the disease on the patients’ daily life.

Results

We identified 911 patients suffering from migraine. The lifetime prevalence was 3.38/100 with male prevalence of 1.95/100 and female prevalence of 4.8/100. The highest prevalence figures were found during early adult life (18–40 years) among both genders reaching a total prevalence of 4.77/100 (2.89/100 for male and 6.53/100 for female). Among migraine patients, most of the attacks recorded were of moderate to severe intensity (97%) although virtually 66% of migraine patients reported that headache significantly interfered with their daily activities.

Conclusion

Lifetime prevalence of migraine is 3.38/100. Migraine headache has a deleterious impact on the patient’s functional and wellbeing.

Introduction

The term “migraine” is derived from the Greek expression “Hemikranion” which means a half skull [1]. Migraine is a headache disorder with attacks of pulsating pain usually occurring on one side of the cranium. It is frequently accompanied by symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and sensitivity to light and noise and is aggravated by movement [2]. Migraine is most prevalent during the peak productive years and has a negative influence on the quality of life. Health economic studies have consistently documented the high medical care use and indirect costs associated with this disabling medical condition [3, 4]. Commonly starting at puberty, migraine mostly affects those aged between 35 and 45 years but can trouble much younger people, including children. Remarkably, despite high levels of temporal disability, many migraineurs have never consulted a physician for the problem, which in turn has introduced selection bias in migraine studies based on patients who seek treatment rather than persons from the general population [5]. Although numerous studies of migraine prevalence have been published, reviews of the epidemiological literature have shown a large variation in the prevalence rates (ranging from 1. 4 to 8%) [6, 7].

This study aims to estimate the prevalence of migraine headache among the population of Al-Quseir city, Red Sea Governorate, Upper Egypt, and to determine migraine-related disability and treatment gap.

Population and methods

This study is part of a door-to-door survey of major neurological disorders that was conducted in Al-Quseir city (Red Sea Governerate) over a period of about 2 ½ years (July 1, 2009, to January 31, 2012). This project was carried out on eligible inhabitants who had been living in Al-Quseir city, for at least 6 months at the time of the study. This study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of Assiut University and Ministry of Health (Red Sea Area Health Service) prior to commencement. All participants gave consent before inclusion to the study. The study area, Al-Quseir city, is a representative city of those lying on Red Sea. Al-Quseir city is the second city in the Red Sea Governorate as regards the number of population [8].

Stage of screening

Sample size of 33,285 persons were screened through door to door (every door) by three specialists of neurology using a standardized Arabic questionnaire, which the authors used in a previous validated study [9, 10]. Fifteen female social workers accompanied the specialists during house visits to collect demographic data.

Then, positive cases were subjected to meticulous clinical and neurological examination for case ascertainment.

Stage of case ascertainment

Respondents were identified as suffering from migraine with aura, migraine without aura, and probable migraine according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2004).

Then, the frequency of attacks was recorded using four grades (less than 1 attack per month, 1–3 attacks per month, 1–3 attacks per week, attacks every day). The intensity of attacks was recorded using three grades (mild, moderate, and severe) according to the International Classification of Headache Society 2004 [2]. Functional disability was assessed through evaluation of the impact of the disease on the patient’s daily life using Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) [11]. Lastly, patients were asked about medical consultations and medicines used during and in between attacks.

Treatment gap

Treatment gap is the number of patients with active migraine, not on treatment, or inadequately treated, expressed as a percentage of the total number with active migraine [14].

Statistical analysis

The data were coded and verified prior to data entry. Data analysis was carried out by using SPSS version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA), and EpiCalc 2000 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Descriptive statistics were calculated. Estimation of prevalence rates was done by dividing the total number of headache suffers over the total population at risk.

Results

From the total number of 33,285 persons, those were screened through door to door, we identified 911 patients suffering from migraine (650 females and 261 males). The lifetime prevalence rate was 3.38/100 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3. 16–3.6), 1.9/100 in males and 4.8/100 in females, with male to female ratio of 1:2.5 (Table 1). The prevalence of migraine was 4.77% in the 18- to < 40-year stratum which was significantly higher in both genders than other age groups (p < 0.01) (Table 1, Fig. 1).

Table 1 Age and sex lifetime prevalence of migraine among the studied population
Fig. 1
figure1

Linear trend of age- and gender-specific prevalence of migraine among studied patients

Analysis of the type of migrainous attacks revealed that 56.9% of patients (n = 519) had migraine without aura, while 34.1% of patients (n = 311) suffer from migraine with aura, and 8.9% (n = 81) had probable migraine (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Frequency of migraine subtypes among the studied population

Evaluation of the frequency of attacks revealed that the majority of patients (72.1%) suffer from 1–3 attacks/month (Table 2). Regarding pain intensity of the attacks, females recorded insignificantly higher rate (55.4%) of severe migraine attacks than males (47.9%) (Table 2).

Table 2 Features of migraine attacks among the studied population

Assessment of disability among migraineurs using MIDAS showed that 42.4% had severe disability (grade IV) with no statistically significant difference between male and female patients (Table 3).

Table 3 MIDAS grading in patients with migraine

Regarding treatment of acute attacks, it was found that 59% of patients (n = 548) use combined analgesic/anti-inflammatory preparations, 19% use simple analgesics, and 21% use ergot preparations, while only 8.1% use triptan (Fig. 3). Regarding prophylactic treatment in between attacks, it was found that the treatment gap among migraineurs was 91.5%, i.e., most detected migraineurs (91.5%) were receiving no prophylactic treatment.

Fig. 3
figure3

Drug options used among studied migrainous patients

Discussion

Although, a door-to-door approach in estimating the prevalence of migraine is difficult and time consuming, it is more accurate than hospital-based studies as the majority of patients do not seek medical advice for self-limited paroxysmal disorders [12, 13]. Moreover, personal interview by a neurologist is better than diagnoses based on self-assessment by patients through questionnaires, as it is devoid of any recall bias and is more sensitive to detect comorbidities [13]. In the present study, the lifetime prevalence rate of migraine was 3.38%, with the highest figure (4.77%) found among young adults (18 to < 40 years). Migraine prevalence in the current study is near the global data of WHO estimates which mentioned that migraine appears somewhat less prevalent, but still common, in Asia (3% of men and 10% of women) and in Africa (3–7% in community-based studies) [14]. However, epidemiological studies had shown that migraine seems to be more prevalent in Europe (14.8%) and North America (11.1%) than it is in Africa (4%) [15]. Although numerous studies of migraine prevalence have been published, reviews of the epidemiological literatures have shown large variation in the prevalence rates, which is mostly explained by differences in socio-demographic profiles of the study subjects, survey methods, and case definition [6, 7, 11, 16].

In the present study, migraine was found to be more prevalent among females (4.8%) than males (1.95%) with male to female ratio of 1:2.5, and this was more obvious around puberty (12 to < 18 years) where male prevalence was 1.26 while female prevalence was 3.9 as mentioned in Table 1. Increased prevalence of migraine among females around puberty could be attributed to hormonal differences particularly related to the newly encountered menstrual cycles, a condition referred to as estrogen-withdrawal headache by the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) [2, 17].

As regards the age-specific prevalence among different age groups, we found that the youngest recorded case of migraine was 6 years. Prevalence then increases steadily to reach its peak at young adults (18 to < 40 years) and then declines again at late adult life (Table 1). These results are partially consistent with most studies on migraine prevalence, which have reported variation among different age groups, with prevalence figures following an inverted U-shaped distribution, increasing from age 15 to 18, peaking during the third and early fourth decades of life and declining thereafter [18, 19].

In the present study, migraine without aura (57%) was more common than migraine with aura (34%). This was in agreement with Houinato et al. [20] and Zivadinov et al. [21] who found that migraine without aura was the most frequent form (67.5% and 62% respectively).

The MIDAS may provide a practical tool to understand the impact of migraine and suggest treatment recommendation [22]. Among studied migraineurs, it was found that about 2/3 (68%) of patients had moderate (26% grade III) to severe disability (42% grade IV) (Table 3). These findings are consistent with the Global Migraine and Zolmitriptan evaluation (MAZE) survey, which states that the migraine patients with grade III or IV was found to be as 54% in France, 47% in England, 48% in Germany, 56% in the USA, and 61% in Italy [23].

Furthermore, besides this severe disability finding, all migraineurs in the present study reported moderate to severe intensity of their migraine attacks. Despite this marked disability and its impact on daily activity of migraineurs, particularly during their reproductive age period (18–40 years), prophylactic treatment was only administered by 8.5% of patients. This yields a very wide treatment gap of 91.5%. This heavy burden of migraine disability, besides the very wide treatment gap, might throw some light on this major health problem and necessitates more public awareness and the need for prophylactic treatment.

The determination of migraine treatment gap is vital for health care planning, both on a public health level and an individual level. This treatment gap is a major cause of suffering and contributes to the socioeconomic burden of the disease. In the present study, treatment gap is 91.5%.

Conclusion

The lifetime prevalence of migraine in Al-Quseir was 3.38/100 with male prevalence of 1.95/100 and female prevalence of 4.8/100. The highest prevalence figures were found during early adult life (18–40 years) among both genders reaching a total prevalence of 4.77/100 (2.89/100 for male and 6.53/100 for female).

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

HIS:

International Headache Society

MIDAS:

Migraine Disability Assessment Scale

References

  1. 1.

    Silberstein SD. Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000;55:754–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Headache Classification Committee. The international classification of headache disorders (2nd edition). Cephalalgia. 2004;24:1–160.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bigal M, Krymchantowski A, Rapoport A, et al. Prophylactic migraine therapy: emerging treatment options. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2004;8:178–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Goldberg LD. The cost of migraine and its treatment. Am J Manag Care. 2005;11:S62–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sheffield RE. Migraine prevalence: a literature review. Headache. 1998;38:595–601.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Natoli JL, Manack A, Dean B, Butler Q, Turkel CC, Stovner L, Lipton RB. Global prevalence of chronic migraine: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(5):599–609.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Pfaffenrath V, Fendrich K, Vennemann M, Meisinger C, Ladwig K-H, Evers S, Straube A, Hoffmann W, Berger K. Regional variations in the prevalence of migraine and tension-type headache applying the new HIS. Cephalalgia. 2009;29:48.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Saed MG, Aly SM, Karim A Masood, editors. Red Sea Governorate achievement index. 2012. [Arabic].

  9. 9.

    El Tallawy HN, Farghaly WM, Rageh TA, Shehata GA, Metwaly NA, Abo elftoh NA, Hegazy MA, et al. Epidemiology of major neurological disorders project in Al Kharga district, New Valley, Egypt. Neuroepidemiology. 2010a;35(4):291–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    El Tallawy HN, Farghaly WM, Metwaly NA, Rageh TA, Shehata GA, Abo elftoh NA, Hegazy MA et al. Door to door survey of major neurological disorders project in Al Kharga district, New Valley, Egypt: methodological aspects. Neuroepidemiology. 2010b;35(4):291–297.

  11. 11.

    Stewart W, Shechter A, Rasmussen B. Migraine prevalence: a review of population-based studies. Neurology. 1994;44(suppl 4):S17–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fernandes PT, Salgado PC, Naronha AL, de Boer HM, Prilipko L, Sander JW, Li LM. Epilepsy stigma perception in an urban area of a limited-resource country. Epilepsy Behav. 2007;11:25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Nachit-Ouinekh F, Chrysostome V, Henry P, Sourgen C, Dartiques JE, El hasanoui A. Variability of reported headache symptoms and diagnosis of migraine at 12 months. Cephalalgia. 2005;25:117–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    World Health Organization, Headache disorders. Fact sheet N_277, 2004.

  15. 15.

    Rigmor J, Lars J. Epidemiology and comorbidity of headache. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:354–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Leonardi M, Steiner T, Scher A, Lipton R. The global burden of migraine: measuring disability in headache disorders with WHO’s classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). J Headache Pain. 2005;6:429–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Misakian A, Langer R, Bensenor I, Manson JE, Buring JE, Rexrode KM. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and migraine headache. J Women's Health (Larchmt). 2003;12:1027–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lipton R, and Bigal M. Migraine: epidemiology, impact, and risk factors for progression. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2005; Vol. 45, Iss. s1.

  19. 19.

    Tepper SJ, Dahlof C, Dowson A, Newman L, Mansbach H, Jones M, Pham B, Webster C, Salonen R. Prevalence and diagnosis of migraine in patients consulting their primary care physician with a complaint of headache: data from the landmark study. Headache. 2004;44:856–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Houinato D, Adoukonou T, Ntsiba F, Adjien C, Avodé DG, Preux PM. Prevalence of migraine in rural community in South Benin. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:62–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zivadinov R, Willheim K, Sepic-Grahovac D, Jurjevic A, Bucuk M, Brnabic-Razmilic O, Rolia G, et al. Migraine and tension type headache in Croatia: a population-based survey of precipitating factors. Cephalalgia. 2003;23:336–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dodick D, Lipton RB, Martin V, Papademetrious V, Rosamond W, MassenVanDen Brick A, Loutfi H, Triptan Cardiovascular Safety Expert Panel, et al. Consensus statement: cardiovascular safety profile of triptans (5-HT agonists) in the acute treatment of migraine. Headache. 2004;44:414–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    MacGregor E, Brandes J, Eikermann A. Migraine prevalence and treatment patterns: the global Migraine and Zolmitriptan Evaluation survey. Headache. 2003;43:19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the hard work of the social workers, who participate in this work.

Funding

There is no source of funding for the research.

Availability of data and materials

Supporting the results of this article are included within the article.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HN, WMF, MAA, SS, and TR contributed to the data collection. RB and MH analyzed the data and along with WTS and KOM interpreted the data. Further, GS completed the first draft of the article. All authors were involved in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and all authors approved the final version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed A. Abdelhamed.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved from the institutional ethics committee of Faculty of medicine, Assiut University. Ethics approval number R0289N2010 at 19th of June, 2015. A written consent was taken from all of the participants after explaining the details, benefits as well as risks to them.

Consent for publication

Is not applicable in this section.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Tallawy, H.N., Farghaly, W.M., Abdelhamed, M.A. et al. Prevalence of migraine in Upper Egypt. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 55, 20 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-019-0067-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • Migraine
  • Al-Quseir
  • Egypt