Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of selected studies

From: Depression and anxiety and its association with problematic social media use in the MENA region: a systematic review

Study

Design

Country

Sample size/

(Female)

Participants

(Mean age ± SD)

Educational status of participants

Dep. and Anx. assessment tool

PSMU assessment tool

Results with PSMU

Effect sizes

Lin et al. (2021)

[30]

Cross-sectional study

Iran

1073/ (57.2%)

Adults

(36.57 ± 10.21)

Educational year: (Mean = 9.87, SD = 4.68)

HADS

BSMAS

Positive and significant association with anxiety and depression

Depression r = 0.195

Anxiety r = 0.170

Lin et al. (2020)

[31]

Cross-sectional study

Iran

1078/

(41.7%)

Adults

(26.24 ± 7.41)

Able to read and write (0.2%); Primary (0.9%); Secondary (9.9%); Diplom (9.25%); College and above (79.9%)

HADS

BSMAS

Positive and significant association with psychological distress

Psychological distress r = 0.377

Lin et al. (2017)

[7]

Cross-sectional study

Iran

2676/

(43.5%)

Adolescents

(15.54 ± 1.21)

High school students

DASS

BSMAS

Positive and significant association with anxiety and depression

Anxiety r = 0.167

Depression r = 0.214

Alimoradi et al. (2019)

[32]

Longitudinal study

Iran

938/

(100%)

Iranian women

(36.5 ± 6.8)

Educational year: (Mean = 11.7, SD = 4.8)

HADS

BSMAS

Positive and significant association with anxiety and depression

Anxiety r = 0.29

Depression r = 0.45

Pirouz, Farahnaz (2016)

[33]

Cross-sectional study

Iran

345/

(NR)

University students

University students

BAI-1996

SMQ

Negative association with anxiety

Anxiety r = -0.55

Dagher et al. (2021)

[34]

Cross-sectional study

Lebanon

466/

(61.8%)

Community population

(27.29 ± 11.46)

Illiterate 1.8%

Primary 3.7%

Complementary 7.0%

Secondary 20.8%

University 66.7%

HDRS

HAM-A

SMUD

Positive and significant association with anxiety and no significant association with depression

Anxiety β = 0.2025

Depression p = 0.528

Barbar et al. (2020)

[35]

Cross-sectional study

Lebanon

466/

(61.8%)

Adults

(27.29 ± 11.46)

Illiterate 1.8%

Primary 3.7%

Complementary 7.0%

Secondary 20.8%

University 66.7%

HDRS

HAM-A

SMD

Positive and significant association with anxiety and depression

Anxiety r = 0.279, B = 0.20

Depression r = 0.181

Malaeb et al. (2020)

[36]

Cross-sectional study

Lebanon

466/

(61.8%)

Adults

(27.29 ± 11.46)

Illiterate 1.8%

Primary 3.7%

Complementary 7.0%

Secondary 20.8%

University 66.7%

HDRS

HAM-A

Severity of dependence to social media

Positive and significant association with anxiety and depression

Anxiety r = 0.178

Depression r = 0.129

Fekih-Romdhane et al. (2021)

[37]

Cross-sectional study

Tunisia

1007/

(64.6%)

University students

(21.9 ± 2.4)

University students

HDRS

HAM-A

ASMAS

Positive and significant association with depressive dimensions of CAPE

Depressive dimensions of CAPE (r = 0.176, r = 0.165)

Hela Ghali et al. (2019)

[38]

Cross-sectional study

Tunisia

1399/

(60.5%)

School students

(17.02 ± 1.51)

School students

NR

Brief version derived from the BFAS

Positive and significant association with depression and no significant association with anxiety

Depression p < 0.0001

Anxiety p = 0.121

Nazzal, Zaher et al. (2018)

[39]

Cross-sectional study

Palestine

938/

(61.9%)

University students

(19.74 ± 1.33)

University students

DASS

FIS

Positive and significant association with depression and anxiety

Depression r = 0.33

Anxiety r = 0.21

Louragli et al. (2019)

[40]

Cross-sectional study

Morocco

541/

(55.1%)

Middle and high school students

(15.24 ± 0.06)

Middle and high school students

GAD-7

BFAS

Positive and significant association with anxiety

Anxiety r = 0.244

Malakeh et al. (2021)

[41]

descriptive correlational design

Jordan

510/

(68.6%)

University students

(21.38 ± 2.12)

University students:

Freshman 8.4%

Sophomore 17.3%

Junior 30.2%

Senior 44.1%

SCL-25

ASMAS

Positive and significant association with depression and anxiety

Depression r = 0.393

Anxiety r = 0.385

Rend Al Saigh et al. (2021)

[42]

Cross-sectional study

United Arab Emirates

105/

(73.3%)

University students

(19.88 ± 2.10)

66.7% of pharmacy students and 68.6% of other university students

PHQ-9

BSMAS

Positive and significant association with depression

Depression B = 0.5

Nadine Zeeni et al. (2018)

[43]

Cross-sectional study

Lebanon

244/

(63.9%)

University students

(18.10 ± 0.64)

University students

DASS-21

MTUAS

Negative association with depression and anxiety

Depression r = -0.11

Anxiety r = -0.07

  1. Dep depression Anx anxiety, Y year, HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, BSMAS Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, DASS Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, BAI-1996 Beck Anxiety Inventory (1996), SMQ Social Media Questionnaire, HDRS Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HAM-A Hamilton Anxiety Scale, SMUD Social Media Use Disorder Scale, SMD Social Media Disorder Scale, CAPE Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences, ASMAS Arabic Social Media Addiction Scale, BFAS Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale, DASS Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, FIS Facebook Intensity Scale, GAD-7 Generalised Anxiety Disorder, SCL-25 Symptom Checklist-25, PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire-9, MTUAS Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale, SD standard deviations, r correlation coefficient, β standardized regression coefficient, B unstandardized regression coefficient, p p value, NR not reported