Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparing cognitive functions between tramadol group and healthy controls

From: Synthetic cannabinoids impact on cognitive functions

 

Control group n = 30 (%)

SC group n = 30 (%)

P value

Benton visual retention test (BVRT)

BVRT (Mean ± SD)

0.5 ± 0.5

10.4 ± 3.2

< 0.001(T)**

Impaired BVRT (%)

0 (0%)

29 (96.7%)

< 0.001(c)**

Trail making test (TMT)

Trail making test Part A (Mean ± SD)

28.9 ± 9.1

74.3 ± 18.5

< 0.001(T)**

Trail making test Part B (Mean ± SD)

58.7 ± 16.7

212.9 ± 35

< 0.001(T)**

Impaired Trail making test (%)

0 (0%)

22 (73.3%)

< 0.001(C)**

Wechsler memory scale (WMS)

Information (Mean ± SD)

16 ± 0

12.9 ± 1.4

< 0.001(T)**

Information Impaired (%)

0 (0%)

16 (53.3%)

< 0.001(C)**

Verbal PAI (Mean ± SD)#

22.6 ± 1

11.5 ± 3.3

< 0.001(T)**

Verbal PAI Impaired (%)

0 (0%)

30 (100%)

< 0.001(c)**

Visual PAI (Mean ± SD)§

16.2 ± 0.9

6.6 ± 2

< 0.001(T)**

Visual PAI Impaired (%)

0 (0%)

30 (100%)

< 0.001(c)**

Digit span (Mean ± SD)

19.9 ± 1.9

7.1 ± 2.2

< 0.001(T)**

Digit span Impaired (%)

0 (0%)

30 (100%)

< 0.001(c)**

Visual MS (Mean ± SD)£

18.7 ± 1.5

5.3 ± 1

< 0.001(T)**

Visual MS Impaired (%)

0 (0%)

30 (100%)

< 0.001(c)**

Verbal PAII (Mean ± SD)#

8.1 ± 0.3

4.6 ± 1.3

< 0.001(T)**

Verbal PAII Impaired (%)

0 (0%)

30 (100%)

< 0.001(c)**

Visual PAII (Mean ± SD)§

6 ± 0

2.9 ± 1

< 0.001(T)**

Visual PAII Impaired (%)

0 (0%)

30 (100%)

< 0.001(c)**

  1. **Statistically highly significant < 0.001
  2. SD, standard deviation; #Verbal paired association I and II; §Visual paired association I and II; £Visual memory span; SC, synthetic cannabinoids
  3. (C), Chi-square test; (T), T test