Cognitive distortions and perfectionism during bipolar and unipolar depressive episode

Table 3 Results of ANCOVA analysis controlling for the HADS score

Variables	F value	P value	Partial n²	Groups compared	Adj. R²
Mind reading total	0,909	0.34	0.006	UD = BD	0.034
Mind reading social	2.09	0.150	0.013	UD = BD	0.036
Labeling total	5.85	0.017	0.036	UD > BD	0.095
Labeling social	5.24	0.023	0.033	UD > BD	0.079
Labeling success	5.31	0.022	0.033	UD > BD	0.091
Personalization social	9.16	0.003	0.055	UD > HC	0.251
Discounting the positive total	2.53	0.114	0.016	UD = BD	0.012
Discounting the positive social	2.45	0.119	0.016	UD = BD	0.029
Discounting the positive success	2.08	0.151	0.013	UD = BD	0.002
FMPS total	10.74	0.001	0.064	UD > HC	0.435
FMPS social-oriented	15.71	< 0.001	0.092	UD > HC	0.432

n² = 0.01 small effect; n² = 0.06 medium effect; n² = 0.14 large effect
Adj.R² explained variance, BD Bipolar depression, FMPS Frost’s multidimensional perfectionism scale, HC Healthy control, UD Unipolar depression