Skip to main content

Table 1 The table displays each included study the study characteristics between single versus multiple PEDs

From: Single versus multiple coverage of pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review

No.

Author (year)

Study period

Study design

Country

Setting

Sample size (n)

Mean age (years)

Female (%)

1

Chalouhi (2014) [11]

May 2011 and May 2013

Retrospective cohort

USA

Single center

178 (126 versus 52)

54.2 versus 61.1

(P = 0.002)

86 versus 81

2

Kabbasch (2016) [13]

March 2011 and December 2013

Retrospective cohort

Germany

Single center

37 (19 versus 18)

53.6 ± 12 versus 55.8 ± 12.7

85 versus 78

3

Waqas (2019) [12]

January 2013 and October 2017

Retrospective cohort

USA

Single center

119 (90 versus 29)

57.7 ± 14.1 versus 55.9 ± 11.3

88.9 versus 79.3

4

Link (2021) [1]

2012 and 2017

Retrospective cohort

USA

Single center

140 (46 versus 94)

55.6 ± 12.2 versus 53.5 ± 12.7

91.3 versus 85.1

5

Vranic (2022) [7]

December 01, 2012 and January 15, 2020

Retrospective cohort

Columbia

USA

Multi

Center

298 (250 versus 48)

54.2 ± 13 versus 58.3 ± 12.4

86 versus 81.2