Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Assessment of the diagnostic performance of various screening tools for bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis

Study

Country

Participants

Age (years)

Female (%)

Diagnostic criteria

Mythological quality

Quality of evidence

Lin 2011 [21]

China

176 Subjects with BD I and BD II, MD

38.94 ± 13.77

97 (57.06%)

DSM-IV-TR

7

Lowd,e

Zhu 2011 [12]

China

95 Subjects with BD and MD

41.55 ± 9.86

62 (65.2%)

DSM-IV

8

Moderated

Saatcioglu 2011 [22]

Turkey

76 Subjects with BD and MD

37.23 ± 9.85

54 (71.05%)

DSM-IV

8

Moderated

Apfelbaum 2013 [23]

Argentina

63 Subjects with BD and MD

43.67 ± 14.06

44 (69.84%)

DSM-IV

6

Lowe

Ma 2013 [24]

China

727 Subjects with BD I and BD II, MD

47.91 ± 12.08

411 (56.5%)

DSM-IV-TR

8

Moderated

Ford 2013 [25]

Canada

30 Subjects with BD and MD

20.61 ± 2.6

16 (53.4%)

DSM-IV

9

High

Mosolov 2014 [26]

Switzerland

409 Subjects with BD I and BD II, MD

44.93 ± 11.18

321 (78.4%)

DSM-IV

8

High

He 2014 [27]

China

120 Subjects with BD and MD

39.91 ± 12.15

82 (68.5%)

DSM-IV

7

Moderated

Gou 2014 [28]

China

176 Subjects with BD and MD

43.67 ± 14.06

121 (68.5%)

DSM-IV

6

Lowe

Ratheesh 2015 [29]

Australia

52 Subjects with BD and MD

19.7 ± 2.8

44 (85%)

DSM-IV-TR

9

High

Aiken 2015 [11]

USA

1851 Patients BD I and BD II, MD

37.01 ± 15.0

1127 (60.89%)

DSM-IV-TR

9

Moderated

Li 2015 [30]

China

120 Subjects with BD and MD

37.62 ± 10.09

86 (71.67%)

DSM-IV

8

Moderated

Ma 2016 [31]

China

615 Subjects with BD and MD

35.14 ± 12.08

517 (84.06%)

DSM-IV

8

High

Heyman-Kantor 2020 [32]

USA

158 Subjects with BD I and BD II, MD

36.64 ± 11.70

94 (59.5%)

DSM-IV

9

High

Ter Meulen 2020 [33]

Netherlands

1857 Subjects with BD I and BD II, MD

42.10 ± 12.40

1278 (68.8%)

DSM-IV-TR

9

Moderated

  1. BI bipolarity index, BSDS Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale, BD bipolar disorder, MDQ Mood Disorder Questionnaire, MINI Mini International Neuropsychological Interview, DSMIV-TR Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, MD major depression, AD affective disorder, SCID-I/II Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I/II disorders, HDRS Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, MADRS Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale, CGI-BD Clinical Global Impression for BD
  2. Factors downgrading any specific evidence: alimitations (risk of bias), binconsistency of results, cindirectness of results, dimprecision, epublications bias