Skip to main content

Table 4 Significant differences of quantitative MUP findings between the two groups

From: Quantitative motor unit potential analysis and nerve conduction studies for detection of subclinical peripheral nerve dysfunction in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis

Parameter

Group

Mean

SD

Median

IQR

95% CI for mean

P value

95% CI for difference

Right FDI Duration (ms)

Patients

(n = 50)

10.19

1.35

10.2

1.6

9.8/

10.58

0.000*

1.02/ 2.42

Controls

(n = 40)

8.47

1.24

8.6

2.4

7.89/

9.05

Right FDI number of Phases

Patients

(n = 50)

3.56

0.57

3.4

0.8

3.39/

3.724

0.001*

 

Controls

(n = 40)

3.09

0.33

3.1

0.4

2.94/

3.24

Right FDI number of Turns

Patients

(n = 50)

3.13

0.71

3

0.99

2.93/

3.34

0.004*

 

Controls

(n = 40)

2.65

0.4

2.6

0.68

2.47/

2.84

Left EHL Duration (ms)

Patients

(n = 50)

11.53

1.53

11.7

1.7

11.09/

11.97

0.000*

0.82/ 2.45

Controls

(n = 39)

9.89

1.48

10.1

2.3

9.18/

10.61

Left EHL number of Phases

Patients

(n = 50)

3.91

0.475

3.8

0.6

3.773/

4.043

0.014*

0.06/ 0.53

Controls

(n = 39)

3.61

0.31

3.5

0.5

3.46/

3.76

Left EHL number of Turns

Patients

(n = 50)

3.76

0.81

3.75

1.19

3.53/

3.99

0.025*

 

Controls

(n = 39)

3.32

0.59

3.1

0.56

3.03/

3.61

Left EHL Thickness

Patients

(n = 50)

1.4

0.27

1.39

0.34

1.32/

1.48

0.047*

0.002/ 0.27

Controls

(n = 39)

1.27

0.18

1.27

0.19

1.18/

1.35

  1. FDI, first dorsal interosseous; EHL, extensor hallucis longus; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile ratio; CI, confidence interval. * Significant P value < 0.05