Skip to main content

From allegory to conceptualization, hypothesis and finally evidences: Alzheimer’s dementia, Parkinson's disease "gut–brain axis" and their preclinical phenotype

Abstract

Researchers are constantly trying to develop therapeutic targets in neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinson's disease. Despite enormous endeavors, there are several unmet needs. Several contradictory pathophysiological basis of neurodegenerative disorders are considered to be one of the most important cause underpinning. "Gut–brain dysbiosis" has been considered as one of the most crucial link to explore. Contemporary researches have suggested similar pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinson's disease. "Gut–brain dysbiosis" may be the missing thread connecting Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinson's disease prior to the expression of their overt clinical phenotype. Recognition of preclinical phenotype of Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinson's disease have much broader perspective as it will help in building robust therapeutics at the earliest. Authors herein critically analyze the pathophysiological basis of Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinson's disease in relationship with "Gut–brain dysbiosis" and also try to search the preclinical phenotype/s of Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinson's disease pivoting around the Freudian hypothesis.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative dementia with diverse pathophysiological basis, ranging from genetic associations to amyloid and recently unearthed tau deposition in the brain [1]. Researchers have sought several risk factors like age, female gender, presence of vascular risk factors, addictions, life styles and poor literary level, underpinning AD [2]. In accordance to the current understanding, AD is more appropriately termed as Alzheimer's disease spectrum disorder due to heterogeneity in clinical presentations, pattern of cognitive impairments, genotypes and biomarkers. The predominant clinical phenotypes in addition to "classical AD" are "frontal-variant AD" (dysexecutive/behavioral), "posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), non amnestic AD and corticobasal AD. The chances of having a "variant AD" are higher with a younger age of presentation. Based on the characteristic pattern of brain atrophy, AD can again be typical, limbic predominant, hippocampal sparing, and with minimal atrophy. It has been observed that cognitive decline in AD primarily involves the default-mode network [3]. The most pertinent question remains as to how to detect AD phenotype at the earliest and if there are any clinical predictors [4, 5]. Recent advances in research targeting on these issues have come up with the concepts of minimal cognitive impairments (MCI) and diverse biomarkers of AD. Numerous proposed blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers to detect AD in early stages (MCI or preclinical stage) have already gained popularity in AD research; and endeavors have started to extrapolate it clinically. It is very much important in clinical practice to identify preclinical AD, or to recognize cognitive and behavioral patterns early, before it becomes clinically overt [6]. However, atypical phenotype and frequent presence of mood symptoms (depression), particularly in older age groups, complicates the scenario. Depression may precede, coincide or follow AD. It is very difficult to differentiate depression, MCI and AD in older age groups, as commonly the history of evolution of symptoms are vague [7,8,9,10].

Several laboratory-based tests focusing on biomarkers have already gained popularity; there is an unmet need for determination of subtle preclinical clues, especially in resource poor settings wherein these tests are elusive to the general population due to availability and affordability issues. Previous studies dedicated to recognizing the clinical continuum/spectrum of AD have shown that "personality traits" have a definitive role in clinical prediction of healthy aging as well as AD phenotype; and its modification can be a potential therapeutic target for AD [11,12,13]. Contemporary researches have shown a probable association between neuroticism and low conscientiousness level with future development of AD [14,15,16,17,18]. Anxiety, depression and obsessive–compulsive spectrum disorders (OCSD) may have an intricate and intriguing relationship with future risk of development of AD. Aligning these evidences in streamline, authors herein try to propose a clinical trajectory of preclinical AD phenotype to clinically overt AD (from neuroticism, OCSD, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and MCI to AD eventually) [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. On the other hand, behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD) are highly prevalent in AD and range from apathy, depression, anxiety, obsessive–compulsive behavior, aggression/agitation, delusions (paranoid usually) to hallucinations, which in turn, impose huge burden and stress on caregivers. The behavioral and psychological symptoms are more common in behavioral variant of fronto-temporal dementia, but it is also be found in Alzheimer's dementia [26]. They are further clustered as hyperactivity symptoms (disinhibition, irritability, and aggression/agitation), psychosis symptoms (delusions and hallucinations) and physical behavior symptoms (eating, appetite, sleep behavior and aberrant motor behavior) [26, 27]. Author's concern in this regard is if neuroticism, OCSD, anxiety, depression and cluster 'C' personality traits can be the preclinical AD phenotype. Author's viewpoint in this regard is that there may be some shared pathophysiological basis or modulation (by the above mentioned psychopathologies) of AD pathobiology underneath, which is reflected by the "pure psychological" phenotype of Alzheimer's disease spectrum earlier in life.

Long back in 1908, Sigmund Freud described anankastic personality disorder (anankastic PD) to illustrate the psychological issues of mental guarding, checking, rigidity, frugality, parsimonious attitude, lack of generosity, obstinacy in certain category of people. Freud compared these traits to constipation/holding of stool and termed it as "anal retentive behavior" in his "psycho-sexual" developmental model [28,29,30,31]. Anankastic PD was later renamed as obsessive–compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual III Revised version (DSM-III-R) and later in DSM-IV, it was grouped under "Cluster C" personality trait. Allegorical conceptualization of the term anankastic PD by Freud now has much wider implication, as it might be the missing thread to amalgamate OCPD, OCD, and their association with constipation and AD in later life [32,33,34]. This raises the question that if Freud had really conjectured the "gut–brain dysbiosis" as one of the most important pathophysiological basis of several neurodegenerative (like AD and PD) and psychiatric disorders or if it was a pure allegorical categorization/nomenclature [35,36,37,38, 38, 39, 39]. There has been a paradigm shift in the understanding of pathophysiological basis of Parkinson's disease (PD) after the conceptualization of "gut–brain dysbiosis" as one of the most important patho-biological link. The gut dysbiosis results in excessive stimulation of the innate immune system and can lead to systemic inflammation. As a result, alpha-synuclein misfolding may be commenced from activation of enteric neurons and enteric glial cells. Furthermore, the bacterial proteins cross-reacting with human antigens may influence the adaptive immune system. The aggregation and propagation of enterically derived alpha-synuclein is probably the inceptive pathophysiological steps that can later result in the development of PD with its characteristic motor and non-motor symptoms [40,41,42,43]. Contemporary research has shown the association of OCPD and OCD with Parkinson's disease [44,45,46,47]. Constipation is one the prominent non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease that needs further attention after "gut–brain dysbiosis" and has effectively been proposed and proven to be the most important patho-biological link [48,49,50,51]. Parkinson's disease is characterized by motor rigidity, bradykinesia, resting tremor and postural instability. However, decreased cognitive flexibilities, executive difficulties, visuospatial dysfunctions and delayed information processing speed (IPS) are the most important facets of cognitive disabilities among the various cognitive domains affected in Parkinson disease dementias (PDD). Obsessive–compulsive behavior is considered to be one of the most common behavioral issues beside depression, anxiety, impulsivity and disinhibition in Parkinson's disease. Constipation is one of the most common non-motor symptom of PD beside anosmia and depression [42, 52,53,54,55,56].

Conclusion

Authors herein try to align these pieces of evidence and connect the dots to figure out the preclinical trajectory of Parkinson's disease and its relationship with "gut–brain dysbiosis" and the "rigid" personality (OCPD) trait, OCD and constipation. Recognition of preclinical phenotypes of AD and PD can greatly augment the understanding of the pathophysiology and offer therapeutics at the earliest. "Gut–brain axis" has already been proven to be the most important patho-biological linkage between AD and PD. It may be intriguing to speculate that the shared clinical continuum of OCPD, OCD, depression, anxiety, "Cluster C" personality traits and constipation are the preclinical phenotype, connecting AD and PD. So did Freud anticipate this entire spectrum while describing "anankastic personality disorder", which was the earliest clue of brain–gut crosstalk later, proved to be "gut–brain dysbiosis"?

Availability of data and materials

All authors confirm the availability of data and material and may be provided on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer's disease

PCA:

Posterior cortical atrophy

MCI:

Minimal cognitive impairments

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

OCSD:

Obsessive–compulsive spectrum disorders

BPSD:

Behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia

Anankastic PD:

Anankastic personality disorder

OCPD:

Obsessive–compulsive personality disorder

DSM-III-R:

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual III Revised version

PD:

Parkinson’s disease

IPS:

Information processing speed

PDD:

Parkinson disease dementias

References

  1. Scheltens P, De Strooper B, Kivipelto M, Holstege H, Chételat G, Teunissen CE, et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 2021;397(10284):1577–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Crous-Bou M, Minguillón C, Gramunt N, Molinuevo JL. Alzheimer’s disease prevention: from risk factors to early intervention. Alzheimer’s Res Ther. 2017;9(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jellinger KA. Recent update on the heterogeneity of the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum. J Neural Transm. 2022;129(1):1–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med. 2004;256(3):183–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Graff-Radford J, Yong KXX, Apostolova LG, Bouwman FH, Carrillo M, Dickerson BC, et al. New insights into atypical Alzheimer’s disease in the era of biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(3):222–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lashley T, Schott JM, Weston P, Murray CE, Wellington H, Keshavan A, et al. Molecular biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and prospects. DMM Dis Model Mech. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.031781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper C, Sommerlad A, Lyketsos CG, Livingston G. Modifiable predictors of dementia in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(4):323–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bennett S, Thomas AJ. Depression and dementia: cause, consequence or coincidence? Maturitas. 2014;79(2):184–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paroni G, Panza F, De Cosmo S, Greco A, Seripa D, Mazzoccoli G. Klotho at the edge of Alzheimer’s disease and senile depression. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56(3):1908–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan YLE, Chen MH, Tsai SJ, Bai YM, Tsai CF, Cheng CM, et al. Treatment-Resistant depression enhances risks of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: a nationwide longitudinal study. J Affect Disord. 2020;274:806–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Onken LS, Nielsen L. Targeting psychological processes related to personality facets to promote healthy aging. Pers Disord Theory Res Treat. 2019;10(1):1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Terracciano A, Sutin AR. Personality and Alzheimer’s disease: an integrative review. Personal Disord Theory, Res Treat. 2019;10(1):4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Segerstrom SC. Personality and incident Alzheimer’s disease: theory, evidence, and future directions. J Gerontol Ser B. 2020;75(3):513–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Duchek JM, Aschenbrenner AJ, Fagan AM, Benzinger TLS, Morris JC, Balota DA. The relation between personality and biomarkers in sensitivity and conversion to Alzheimer-type dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617719001358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Terracciano A, Sutin AR, An Y, O’Brien RJ, Ferrucci L, Zonderman AB, et al. Personality and risk of Alzheimer’s disease: new data and meta-analysis. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2013.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Archer N, Brown RG, Reeves S, Nicholas H, Boothby H, Lovestone S. Midlife neuroticism and the age of onset of Alzheimer’s disease. Psychol Med. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329170800408X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Capuano AW, Wilson RS, Leurgans SE, Sampaio C, Barnes LL, Farfel JM, et al. Neuroticism, negative life events, and dementia in older White and Black Brazilians. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. De Jager CH, White CC, Bennett DA, Ma Y. Neuroticism alters the transcriptome of the frontal cortex to contribute to the cognitive decline and onset of Alzheimer’s disease. Transl Psychiatry. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01253-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Marchant NL, Howard RJ. Cognitive debt and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2015. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-141515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zufferey V, Donati A, Popp J, Meuli R, Rossier J, Frackowiak R, et al. Neuroticism, depression, and anxiety traits exacerbate the state of cognitive impairment and hippocampal vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement Diagn Assess Dis Monit. 2017;7.

  21. Henriques-Calado J. Personality traits and disorders in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Behav. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2938.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Byun MS, Jung JH, Sohn BK, Yi D, Lee JH, Jeon SY, et al. Neuroticism, conscientiousness, and in vivo Alzheimer pathologies measured by amyloid PET and MRI. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Terracciano A, Aschwanden D, Passamonti L, Toschi N, Stephan Y, Luchetti M, et al. Is neuroticism differentially associated with risk of Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia, and frontotemporal dementia? J Psychiatr Res. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.03.039.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Shen C, Rolls ET, Cheng W, Kang J, Dong G, Xie C, et al. Associations of social isolation and loneliness with later dementia. Neurology. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000200583.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Terracciano A, Iacono D, O’Brien RJ, Troncoso JC, An Y, Sutin AR, et al. Personality and resilience to Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology: a prospective autopsy study. Neurobiol Aging. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.08.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Deardorff WJ, Grossberg GT. Behavioral and psychological symptoms in Alzheimer’s dementia and vascular dementia. In: Handbook of clinical neurology. 2019.

  27. Kim B, Noh GO, Kim K. Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and family caregiver burden: a path analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02109-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Haslam N. Anal expulsive/anal retentive personality. In: Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. 2020.

  29. Freud S, Haute Pv, Westerink H. Sigmund Freud. Three essays on the theory of sexuality the 1905 edition. Vol. 53, Verso. 2013.

  30. Freud S, Bullitt WC. Woodrow Wilson: a psychological study. 2018.

  31. Freud S, Gay P. The Freud reader. 832.

  32. Kendell RE. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd ed. Am J Psychiatry. 1980. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.137.12.1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Reddy MS, Starlin VM, Reddy S. Obsessive-compulsive (Anankastic) personality disorder: a poorly researched landscape with significant clinical relevance. Indian J Psychol Med. 2016. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.175085.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Coles ME, Pinto A, Mancebo MC, Rasmussen SA, Eisen JL. OCD with comorbid OCPD: a subtype of OCD? J Psychiatr Res. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.12.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ruggeri M, Ricci M, Gerace C, Blundo C. Late-onset obsessive-compulsive disorder as the initial manifestation of possible behavioural variant Alzheimer’s disease. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2021.1996342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen MH, Cheng CM, Tsai SJ, Tsai CF, Su TP, Li CT, et al. Obsessive-compulsive disorder and dementia risk: a nationwide longitudinal study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.20m13644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cifci I, Gokdemir O, Aygun O, Guldal D. Evaluation of functional constipation frequency and related factors. Fam Pract. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Barrio C, Arias-Sánchez S, Martín-Monzón I. Letter to the editor: an erroneous reading of our systematic review on the gut-microbiota-brain axis. A Letter to the Editor in response to “The gut microbiota-brain axis, psychobiotics and its influence on brain and behaviour: a systematic review” by B. Dalile (reference PNEC_105758). Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mitrea L, Nemeş SA, Szabo K, Teleky BE, Vodnar DC. Guts imbalance imbalances the brain: a review of gut microbiota association with neurological and psychiatric disorders. Front Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.813204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mulak A, Bonaz B. Brain–gut–microbiota axis in Parkinson’s disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10609.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Socała K, Doboszewska U, Szopa A, Serefko A, Włodarczyk M, Zielińska A, et al. The role of microbiota-gut-brain axis in neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. Pharmacol Res. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105840.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rutsch A, Kantsjö JB, Ronchi F. The gut–brain axis: how microbiota and host inflammasome influence brain physiology and pathology. Front Immunol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.604179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Klann EM, Dissanayake U, Gurrala A, Farrer M, Shukla AW, Ramirez-Zamora A, et al. The gut–brain axis and its relation to Parkinson’s disease: a review. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;13: 782082.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Hollander E, Kim S, Braun A, Simeon D, Zohar J. Cross-cutting issues and future directions for the OCD spectrum. Psychiatry Res. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.07.015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Zang Y, Lai X, Li C, Ding D, Wang Y, Zhu Y. The role of gut microbiota in various neurological and psychiatric disorders—an evidence mapping based on quantified evidence. Mediators Inflamm. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5127157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Liou YJ, Bai YM, Chen MH, Cheng CM, Chen TJ, Tsai SJ. Obsessive-compulsive disorder and risk of Parkinson disease: a nationwide longitudinal study. Psychosom Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000001120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Parolari L, Schneeberger M, Heintz N, Friedman JM. Functional analysis of distinct populations of subthalamic nucleus neurons on Parkinson’s disease and OCD-like behaviors in mice. Mol Psychiatry. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01162-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sun X, Xue L, Wang Z, Xie A. Update to the treatment of Parkinson’s disease based on the gut–brain axis mechanism. Front Neurosci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.878239.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Felice VD, Quigley EM, Sullivan AM, O’Keeffe GW, O’Mahony SM. Microbiota–gut–brain signalling in Parkinson’s disease: implications for non-motor symptoms. Parkinson Relat Disord. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.03.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang Q, Luo Y, Ray Chaudhuri K, Reynolds R, Tan EK, Pettersson S. The role of gut dysbiosis in Parkinson’s disease: mechanistic insights and therapeutic options. Brain. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Schapira AHV, Chaudhuri KR, Jenner P. Non-motor features of Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Emre M, Aarsland D, Brown R, Burn DJ, Duyckaerts C, Mizuno Y, et al. Clinical diagnostic criteria for dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.21507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Aarsland D, Creese B, Politis M, Chaudhuri KR, Ffytche DH, Weintraub D, et al. Cognitive decline in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2017.27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Vasconcellos LFR, Pereira JS. Parkinson’s disease dementia: diagnostic criteria and risk factor review. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2015.1073227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Schwertner E, Pereira JB, Xu H, Secnik J, Winblad B, Eriksdotter M, et al. Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia in different dementia disorders: a large-scale study of 10,000 individuals. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-215198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Dubey S, Dubey MJ, Ghosh R, Mukherjee D, Pandit A, Benito-León J. Behavioral and psychological symptoms in neurodegenerative dementias: harbinger, follower, or constant collateral? Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-022-00538-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The initial concept and design of the study was generated by SD1. Literature search was done by SD1, RG, MJD, SS and SD2. SD1 wrote the first draft and carried out the subsequent revision. The draft was critically reviewed by SD1 from its initial stage. Expert opinion from by SD1, RG, MJD, SS and SD2 improved the quality of the final manuscript substantially. All the authors agreed upon the final form of the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shambaditya Das.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No patient was involved in preparing the manuscript and hence ethical approval was not required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dubey, S., Ghosh, R., Dubey, M.J. et al. From allegory to conceptualization, hypothesis and finally evidences: Alzheimer’s dementia, Parkinson's disease "gut–brain axis" and their preclinical phenotype. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 60, 89 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00863-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00863-3

Keywords