Table 8 Comparison between the present study and previous researches assessed the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve sensory conduction study [1, 29, 30]
Study | Technique | Number of participants (number of assessed lower limbs) | SNAP onset latency (ms) Mean ± SD | SNAP peak latency (ms) Mean ± SD | SNAP conduction velocity (m/s) Mean ± SD | SNAP amplitude (μV) Mean ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Present study | Antidromic study | 60 (120) | 2.04 ± 0.21 | 2.86 ± 0.25 | 59.45 ± 6.36 | 6.16 ± 2.29 |
Dumitru et al. [1] | Antidromic study | 40 (80) | NA | 2.8 ± 0.2 | NA | 6.5 ± 1.5 |
Park et al. [30] | Antidromic study | 20 (40) | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.2 | NA | 7.1 ± 1.7 |
Brooks et al. [29] | Antidromic study | 58 (116) | 2.0 ± 0.5 | NA | 52.0 ± 4.0 | 7.0 ± 2.1 |