Skip to main content

Table 5 Correlation between Pfirrmann classification and the degree of nerve root compression

From: Correlation between lumbar spinal canal magnetic resonance imaging grading systems and parameters in lumbar spinal canal compromise

 

Pfirrmann L3–4

Pfirrmann L4–5

Pfirrmann L5–S1

Mid-sagittal AP diameter of dural sac

 rs

0.020

− 0.193

0.000

 p

0.888

0.180

1.000

Cross-sectional area of dural sac

 rs

− 0.527

− 0.670

− 0.333

 p

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

0.018*

Degree of the dural sac compression at disc level (%)

 rs

− 0.668

− 0.620

− 0.486

 p

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

Central spinal canal grading

 rs

0.684

0.612

0.473

 p

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

0.001*

Rt. LSC

 rs

− 0.576

− 0.605

− 0.619

 p

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

Grade of Rt. LSC

 rs

0.643

0.602

0.675

 p

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

Lt. LSC

 rs

− 0.564

− 0.554

− 0.539

 p

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

Grade of Lt. LSC

 rs

0.651

0.642

0.557

 p

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

Diameter of Rt. intervertebral foramen

 rs

− 0.457

− 0.610

− 0.576

 p

0.001*

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

Grade of Rt. lumbar foraminal stenosis

 rs

0.392

0.652

0.475

 p

0.005*

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

Diameter of Lt. intervertebral foramen

 rs

− 0.327

− 0.529

− 0.560

 p

0.020*

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

Grade of Lt. lumbar foraminal stenosis

 rs

0.382

0.550

0.536

 p

0.006*

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

  1. rs coefficient of Spearman’s rank-order correlation
  2. *Significant at p < 0.05