Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of included systematic reviews regarding stroke in COVID-19 infection

From: Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 infection: an umbrella review

Authors

Origin

Type

Quality

Number of included studies

Types of included studies

Assessing the quality of included studies

Searched databases

Main results

1. Valencia-Enciso et al. 2020 [42]

Colombia

Systematic review

Moderate

47

Cohort, case series, case report, case–control

NOS

Pubmed, Scopus

A positive correlation seemed to exist between COVID-19 severity and temporality of stroke

2. Fraiman et al. 2020 [43]

South Korea

Systematic review

Critically Low

80

Not mentioned

None

Pubmed

Cerebrovascular events, especially ischemic stroke, were a common neurological manifestation in COVID-19 patients

3. Lee et al. 2020 [32]

Malaysia

Systematic review + meta-analysis

Moderate

28

Cohort, case series, case report

STROBE2

Pubmed, Medline, Cinhal

Stroke is an uncommon symptom in COVID-19 patients, but can be prognostic factor and an indicator of the severity of the infection

4. Bhatia et al. 2020 [44]

India

Systematic review

Moderate

30

Cohort, case series, case report

Oxford CEBM3 critical appraisal tool

Pubmed, Embase, Scopus

COVID-19 is associated with higher mortality rates in stroke patients

5. Wijeratne et al. 2020 [40]

Australia

Systematic review

Low

18

Cohort, case series, case report, case–control, reviews

None

Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline, Cinhal, Ovid

Neutrophil–Lymphocyte ratio at time admission is associated with the duration before onset of clinical features of AIS3

6. Fridman et al. 2020 [33]

Canada

Systematic review + meta-analysis

Low

10

Not mentioned

None

Pubmed, medRxiv, bioRxiv, Research Square search engines

The mortality of Stroke in COVID-19 patients is associated with age, comorbidities and the severity of the infection

7. Yamakawa et al. 2020 [35]

USA

Systematic review + meta-analysis

Moderate

26

Cohort, case series, case report, case–control

Assessment of risk of bias in prevalence studies

Pubmed, Embase,

The frequency of detected stroke in hospitalized patients was associated with age and other stroke risk factors

8. Katsanos et al. [34]

Greece

Systematic review + meta-analysis

High

18

Cohort

NOS

Pubmed, Scopus

COVID-19 infection is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke, especially cryptogenic stroke; in addition to an increased risk of mortality

9. Tan et al. 2020 [37]

Singapore

Systematic review + meta-analysis

Moderate

39

Cohort, case series, case report

NOS, JBI5 tool

Pubmed, Embase

AIS is associated with COVID-19 infection with a high mortality rate

10. Nannoni et al. 2020 [36]

UK

Systematic review + meta-analysis

Moderate

61

Cohort, case series, case report, case–control, letters

NOS

Pubmed, Scopus, MedRxiv

Acute cerebrovascular events are associated with the severity of the disease and pre-existing vascular risk factors in COVID-19 patients

11. Fatima et al. 2020 [41]

USA

Systematic review

Moderate

6

Cohort, case series, case report

GRADE6, Cochrane Collaboration’s tool

Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Medline

Stroke is associated with COVID-19 infection in patients with underlying risk factors including hypertension

12. Siepmann et al. 2021 [38]

Germany

Cohort + Systematic review

Critically Low

2

Cohort, experimental

Oxford CEBM tool

Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library

The severity of COVID-19 infection is associated with an increased risk of acute stroke

13. Szegedi et al. 2020 [39]

Germany

Narrative review + Systematic review

Critically Low

25

Cohort, case series, case report

None

Pubmed, Scopus

In COVID-19 patients the most common type of stroke was AIS

  1. 1. NOS :Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, 2. STROBE: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology, 3. CEBM: Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, 4. AIS: Acute Ischemic Stroke, 5. JBI: Joanna Briggs Institute 6. GRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant