Table 5 Comparison between patients with poor outcome and patients with good outcome according to variables that showed significant differences
From: Endovascular coiling for cerebral aneurysm: single-center experience in Egypt
Patients characteristics | Poor outcome patients (n = 6) | Good outcome patients (n = 25) | × 2/t | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | % | No. | % | |||
Myocardial infarction | 1 | 16.7 | 0 | 0.0 | 4.306 | 0.038 |
Hunt and Hess scale | ||||||
1–2 | 0 | 0.0 | 14 | 56.0 | 6.075 | 0.023 |
3–4 | 6 | 100.0 | 11 | 44.0 | ||
Admission mRS | ||||||
0–2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 40.0 | 3.963 | 0.044 |
3–5 | 6 | 100 | 15 | 60 | ||
Fisher grading | ||||||
1–2 | 1 | 16.7 | 21 | 84.0 | 7.630 | 0.006 |
3–4 | 5 | 83.3 | 4 | 16.0 | ||
Vasospasm-related infarction | 4 | 66.7 | 1 | 4.0 | 14.047 | < 0.001 |
Vasospasm | 5 | 83.3 | 8 | 32.0 | 5.236 | 0.022 |
Hydrocephalus necessitating shunt | 2 | 33.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 8.908 | 0.003 |